gcc archive
date index for September, 2007

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

September 30, 2007
17:24 Re: GCC 4.2.2 RC2 Available Mark Mitchell
14:10 Re: [RFC,wwwdocs] Ditch MetaHTML and use our own Perl preprocessor Janne Blomqvist
13:24 Re: Automatic cast off "union tree" in gdb Tom Tromey
11:03 Automatic cast off "union tree" in gdb k e
10:27 Re: PL/I for GCC version 0.0.15 released henrik . sorensen
09:21 Re: PL/I for GCC version 0.0.15 released Rafael Espindola

September 29, 2007
20:52 [RFC,wwwdocs] Ditch MetaHTML and use our own Perl preprocessor FX Coudert
20:33 PL/I for GCC version 0.0.15 released henrik . sorensen
19:13 Re: outof-ssa vs. -fnon-call-exceptions: known problem? Diego Novillo
19:09 Re: outof-ssa vs. -fnon-call-exceptions: known problem? Andrew Pinski
19:06 Re: outof-ssa vs. -fnon-call-exceptions: known problem? Richard Sandiford
17:14 Re: outof-ssa vs. -fnon-call-exceptions: known problem? Diego Novillo
15:23 Re: AltiVec stack boundary Daniel Jacobowitz
14:42 Re: Is this a bug? Richard Li
12:38 Is this a bug? Zhang Xiaoping
11:50 Re: unflattening fortran matrices Janne Blomqvist
10:57 outof-ssa vs. -fnon-call-exceptions: known problem? Richard Sandiford
07:31 Re: Ada bootstrap broken Eric Botcazou
07:20 Re: Ada bootstrap broken Ollie Wild
07:12 Re: Ada bootstrap broken Eric Botcazou
03:52 Re: Ada bootstrap broken Ollie Wild
01:37 Re: tgmath.h and newlib Geoffrey Keating
01:19 Re: GCC 4.2.2 RC2 Available Manuel López-Ibáñez
01:13 Re: GCC 4.2.2 RC2 Available Manuel López-Ibáñez
00:52 Re: PING SC members [was RE: RFA: GCC 4.2.1: Stabalizing coalesce_list's qsort] Geoffrey Keating
00:47 GCC 4.2.2 RC2 Available Mark Mitchell
00:22 Re: AltiVec stack boundary Geoffrey Keating
00:20 Ada bootstrap broken John David Anglin

September 28, 2007
22:45 gcc-4.3-20070928 is now available gccadmin
18:42 Re: Profile information - CFG Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
17:16 RE: MetaHTML and the GCC web site Dave Korn
17:06 Re: MetaHTML and the GCC web site Joel Sherrill
16:29 RE: MetaHTML and the GCC web site Dave Korn
16:10 Fwd: MetaHTML and the GCC web site François-Xavier Coudert
13:59 Re: GCC 4.2.2 RC2 (finally) Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:31 Re: C++: operator new and disabled exceptions Christian BRUEL
12:54 C++: operator new and disabled exceptions Christophe LYON
09:23 Re: testsuite for libgomp and so on... Andrew Pinski
05:02 Re: testsuite for libgomp and so on... Ben Elliston
04:54 testsuite for libgomp and so on... Zhang Xiaoping
04:01 GCC 4.2.2 RC2 (finally) Mark Mitchell
03:13 Re: Question on GGC 吴曦
02:20 Re: Question on GGC 吴曦
01:22 context-sensitive keywords, revisited Ben Elliston

September 27, 2007
20:21 Re: missing optimization - don't compute return value not used? Joe Buck
18:18 Re: missing optimization - don't compute return value not used? Aaron W. LaFramboise
16:56 LLVM 2.1 Release Chris Lattner
15:43 Profile information - CFG Hariharan Sandanagobalane
15:43 Re: Question on GGC Zdenek Dvorak
15:31 Question on GGC 吴曦
08:35 Re: $RANLIB not passed to libiberty Paolo Bonzini
01:00 Re: missing optimization - don't compute return value not used? Richard Li
00:02 Re: [libobjc] Shouldn't "version" take a long? Jose Quinteiro

September 26, 2007
20:23 Re: [libobjc] Shouldn't "version" take a long? Jose Quinteiro
18:51 Re: deadline extension for debug info project into GCC 4.3 stage3? Alexandre Oliva
18:50 Re: [libobjc] Shouldn't "version" take a long? Andrew Pinski
18:36 Re: Require help with the backend in gcc V. Karthik Kumar
18:24 [libobjc] Shouldn't "version" take a long? Jose Quinteiro
17:56 Re: [Bug target/33479] SyncTest Intermittent failing on MIPS David Daney
17:49 Re: Require help with the backend in gcc Ian Lance Taylor
17:45 Re: support single predicate set instructions in GCC-4.1.1 Jim Wilson
17:43 Require help with the backend in gcc V. Karthik Kumar
17:39 Re: Poor pow() / floating point performance of on x86_64 Tim Prince
16:31 Re: Poor pow() / floating point performance of on x86_64 Richard Guenther
16:28 Re: Poor pow() / floating point performance of on x86_64 Ralf LÃbben
16:21 $RANLIB not passed to libiberty Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
15:35 Re: support single predicate set instructions in GCC-4.1.1 吴曦
13:32 Re: missing optimization - don't compute return value not used? Richard Li
13:06 missing optimization - don't compute return value not used? Neal Becker
00:51 Re: Q about assignment expansion DJ Delorie
00:49 Re: Q about assignment expansion DJ Delorie
00:48 Re: support tnat instruction on IA-64. error occurs in bundling. help Jim Wilson
00:11 Re: support tnat instruction on IA-64. error occurs in bundling. help 吴曦

September 25, 2007
23:33 Re: support tnat instruction on IA-64. error occurs in bundling. help Jim Wilson
22:57 Re: Q about assignment expansion Andrew Pinski
21:53 Re: Re:AST-tree in GCC Diego Novillo
19:49 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Martin Jambor
18:33 Re: support single predicate set instructions in GCC-4.1.1 Jim Wilson
18:07 Re: Long standing ppc64 regression. Any workarounds? Diego Novillo
15:25 Re: Long standing ppc64 regression. Any workarounds? Benjamin Kosnik
15:04 support tnat instruction on IA-64. error occurs in bundling. help 吴曦
14:44 Re: Q about assignment expansion DJ Delorie
13:22 Re: bootstrap error on ppc64 David Edelsohn
11:58 Re: Long standing ppc64 regression. Any workarounds? David Edelsohn
11:39 Long standing ppc64 regression. Any workarounds? Diego Novillo
10:50 Re:Re:AST-tree in GCC Johan Bohlin
10:33 Question about how to have an target specific type-based operator Kai Tietz
10:30 bootstrap error on ppc64 Revital1 Eres
09:20 Re: Q about assignment expansion Andrew Pinski
08:53 getting operands of call arguments and return values Alexander Sotirov
07:13 Re: support single predicate set instructions in GCC-4.1.1 吴曦
04:16 Q about assignment expansion DJ Delorie
00:22 Re: tgmath.h and newlib John David Anglin

September 24, 2007
22:42 gcc-4.1-20070924 is now available gccadmin
21:58 Re: support single predicate set instructions in GCC-4.1.1 Jim Wilson
21:55 Re: Bug in gcc: assignment to non-lvalue Jonathan Wakely
20:38 tgmath.h and newlib Richard Sandiford
18:53 Re: How to force instruction in slot1 while emit NOP in slot0 if necessary? Ian Lance Taylor
18:15 Re: how to chase a tree check failure in verify_ssa? Diego Novillo
18:10 Re: how to chase a tree check failure in verify_ssa? Gary Funck
17:56 Re: how to chase a tree check failure in verify_ssa? Gary Funck
15:13 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Daniel Berlin
15:11 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Daniel Berlin
14:56 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Diego Novillo
14:54 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:49 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Diego Novillo
14:44 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:34 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Diego Novillo
14:22 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Manuel López-Ibáñez
14:09 Re: Inconsistent error/pedwarn: ISO C++ Manuel López-Ibáñez
13:39 Re: AST-tree in GCC Thomas A.M. Bernard
13:36 Re: how to chase a tree check failure in verify_ssa? Diego Novillo
13:19 Re: AST-tree in GCC Diego Novillo
11:36 How to force instruction in slot1 while emit NOP in slot0 if necessary? Bingfeng Mei
11:00 AST-tree in GCC Johan Bohlin
07:29 Re: gcc crosscompile for PPC, Please help! Revital1 Eres
06:18 gcc crosscompile for PPC, Please help! ashok
01:30 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Daniel Berlin
01:29 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Daniel Berlin
00:06 Re: Bug in gcc: assignment to non-lvalue Jonathan Adamczewski

September 23, 2007
20:03 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Manuel López-Ibáñez
20:00 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Richard Guenther
19:56 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Manuel López-Ibáñez
19:45 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Richard Guenther
19:28 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Manuel López-Ibáñez
18:57 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Richard Guenther
18:41 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Manuel López-Ibáñez
17:00 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Richard Guenther
16:54 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Ian Lance Taylor
16:27 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Richard Guenther
16:14 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Ian Lance Taylor
15:48 Register Allocation Reviewers David Edelsohn
14:54 Cambio de direccion. ckeptours at cantv dot net
10:50 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Richard Guenther
05:20 how to chase a tree check failure in verify_ssa? Gary Funck
04:16 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Daniel Berlin

September 22, 2007
19:27 Re: GCC 4.3.0: Stage 3 Ian Lance Taylor
15:05 Re: Bug in gcc: assignment to non-lvalue Jonathan Wakely
12:30 support single predicate set instructions in GCC-4.1.1 吴曦
01:33 Re: porting problem again: ICE in add_clobbers Jim Wilson

September 21, 2007
22:44 gcc-4.3-20070921 is now available gccadmin
22:27 Re: [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Andrew Pinski
22:06 [RFC] failures found while pounding on GCC trunk Janis Johnson
22:01 Re: porting problem again: ICE in add_clobbers Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
20:50 Re: porting problem again: ICE in add_clobbers Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
15:48 Re: function overloading and variadic arguments Peter A. Felvegi
14:53 Re: porting problem again: ICE in add_clobbers Tomas Svensson
14:34 RE: function overloading and variadic arguments Dave Korn
10:42 Re: Stack parameter - pass by value - frame usage Hariharan Sandanagobalane
09:14 Bootstrap comparison failure on sparc64/sparc linux Christian Joensson
08:23 Re: Bug in gcc: assignment to non-lvalue Aaron W. LaFramboise

September 20, 2007
23:54 Re: Bug in gcc: assignment to non-lvalue Michiel de Bondt
23:51 Re: Understanding Macro Pre-processor Ben Elliston
20:24 Re: g++ 4.3.0 error: changes meaning Richard Guenther
19:45 Re: g++ 4.3.0 error: changes meaning Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
19:43 Understanding Macro Pre-processor Bruno Moreira Guedes
19:20 Re: g++ 4.3.0 error: changes meaning Andrew Pinski
19:07 function overloading and variadic arguments Peter A. Felvegi
19:04 g++ 4.3.0 error: changes meaning Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
18:36 Re: Bug in gcc: assignment to non-lvalue Andrew Pinski
18:25 Bug in gcc: assignment to non-lvalue Michiel de Bondt
17:45 RE: [wwwdocs] Patch for RE: Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option Dave Korn
11:17 Inconsistent error/pedwarn: ISO C++ Doug Gregor
09:42 Re: GCC spec posting on AMD Barcelona Andrew Walrond
08:20 Re: GCC spec posting on AMD Barcelona Robert Dewar
06:30 Re: GCC spec posting on AMD Barcelona Andrew Walrond
01:21 Re: Signed division with rounding towards -infinity (and floating point rounding) Jim Wilson

September 19, 2007
22:31 [wwwdocs] Patch for RE: Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option Gerald Pfeifer
21:46 GCC spec posting on AMD Barcelona Michael Meissner
18:28 Re: MIPS atomic memory operations (A.K.A PR 33479). Ralf Baechle
18:22 Re: MIPS atomic memory operations (A.K.A PR 33479). Thiemo Seufer
18:09 Re: MIPS atomic memory operations (A.K.A PR 33479). Maciej W. Rozycki
17:50 Re: MIPS atomic memory operations (A.K.A PR 33479). David Daney
17:47 Re: MIPS atomic memory operations (A.K.A PR 33479). David Daney
17:46 Re: MIPS atomic memory operations (A.K.A PR 33479). Maciej W. Rozycki
17:26 Re: MIPS atomic memory operations (A.K.A PR 33479). David Daney
17:08 Re: MIPS atomic memory operations (A.K.A PR 33479). Maciej W. Rozycki
16:58 Re: MIPS atomic memory operations (A.K.A PR 33479). Ralf Baechle
16:38 Re: GCC 4.3.0: Stage 3 Andreas Krebbel
14:54 Re: porting problem again: ICE in add_clobbers Ian Lance Taylor
14:53 Re: GCC 4.3.0: Stage 3 Ian Lance Taylor
14:51 Re: GCC 4.3.0: Stage 3 Ian Lance Taylor
09:55 Re: [Bug c/33076] Warning when passing a pointer to a const array to a function that expects a point Jan Beulich
08:53 Re: MIPS atomic memory operations (A.K.A PR 33479). Thiemo Seufer
08:31 Re: GCC 4.3.0: Stage 3 Andreas Krebbel
08:14 Re: porting problem again: ICE in add_clobbers Tomas Svensson
07:16 powerpc bootstrap failure Razya Ladelsky
06:23 RE: Two quick C++ performace inquiries Ioannis Gyftos
03:43 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Jie Zhang
02:32 Re: MIPS atomic memory operations (A.K.A PR 33479). Daniel Jacobowitz
00:13 MIPS atomic memory operations (A.K.A PR 33479). David Daney

September 18, 2007
21:23 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part Richard Sandiford
17:45 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
17:14 Re: porting problem again: ICE in add_clobbers Jim Wilson
16:09 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
16:06 Re: Signed division with rounding towards -infinity (and floating point rounding) Christopher Key
15:57 Re: Newbie questions about gcc / glibc Ian Lance Taylor
15:50 Re: Newbie questions about gcc / glibc DJ Delorie
15:12 Newbie questions about gcc / glibc Frederich, Eric P21322
14:51 Re: porting problem again: ICE in add_clobbers Tomas Svensson
14:50 Re: porting problem again: ICE in add_clobbers Ian Lance Taylor
14:48 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Jie Zhang
14:27 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Bernd Schmidt
14:19 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Jie Zhang
14:12 RE: Two quick C++ performace inquiries Dave Korn
14:11 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Jie Zhang
14:02 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Jie Zhang
14:01 Two quick C++ performace inquiries Ioannis Gyftos
13:55 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
13:33 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Daniel Jacobowitz
13:27 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Bernd Schmidt
13:26 Re: Signed division with rounding towards -infinity (and floating point rounding) Tim Prince
13:15 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Jie Zhang
13:13 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Bernd Schmidt
12:52 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Jie Zhang
12:39 Signed division with rounding towards -infinity (and floating point rounding) Christopher Key
12:25 Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Bernd Schmidt
11:56 Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES Jie Zhang
10:54 porting problem again: ICE in add_clobbers Tomas Svensson
05:26 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part Kenneth Zadeck
00:55 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part Kenneth Zadeck

September 17, 2007
23:38 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part Richard Sandiford
22:48 gcc-4.1-20070917 is now available gccadmin
22:12 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part Janis Johnson
21:42 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part Andreas Schwab
21:31 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell
20:39 Re: Ada rts fails to build on ppc64? Laurent GUERBY
20:32 Re: Ada rts fails to build on ppc64? Joel Sherrill
20:20 Re: Ada rts fails to build on ppc64? Jack Howarth
20:10 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part Andrew Pinski
20:04 Re: bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part Jakub Jelinek
18:45 Re: Ada rts fails to build on ppc64? Laurent GUERBY
17:50 bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_variable_part Janis Johnson
15:55 Re: Ada rts fails to build on ppc64? Andreas Schwab
13:55 Re: ICE on valid code, cse related Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
13:19 Re: Ada rts fails to build on ppc? Eric Botcazou
12:17 Re: Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option Sandra Loosemore
11:48 Online Job Representative Staff Kimcham Fatu
11:46 Online Job Representative Staff Kimcham Fatu
11:41 Re: Should -ftrapv check type conversion? Joseph S. Myers
11:25 Re: Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option Joseph S. Myers
10:50 Re: Ada rts fails to build on ppc? Richard Guenther
10:41 Ada rts fails to build on ppc64? Richard Guenther
10:34 Online Job Representative Staff Kimcham Fatu
10:34 Online Job Representative Staff Kimcham Fatu
09:06 Re: Define __NO_MATH_INLINES for x86 -ffast-math? Jan Hubicka
08:59 Re: Define __NO_MATH_INLINES for x86 -ffast-math? Richard Guenther
08:57 Define __NO_MATH_INLINES for x86 -ffast-math? Uros Bizjak
06:56 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Kai Tietz
06:36 libstdc++-v3/include/precompiled weirdness Ollie Wild
06:18 Should -ftrapv check type conversion? Ken Raeburn
05:39 Re: Trap floating-point exceptions? Ben Elliston
03:51 Trap floating-point exceptions? Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve
00:40 RE: PING SC members [was RE: RFA: GCC 4.2.1: Stabalizing coalesce_list's qsort] Dave Korn
00:40 RE: Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option Dave Korn

September 16, 2007
23:35 Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option Gerald Pfeifer
23:28 Re: PING SC members [was RE: RFA: GCC 4.2.1: Stabalizing coalesce_list's qsort] Gerald Pfeifer
15:28 Legal Experts Directory Legal Experts
08:23 Re: Question about rs6000 zero_fp_constant predicate Eric Botcazou
08:18 Question about rs6000 zero_fp_constant predicate Revital1 Eres

September 15, 2007
20:07 Nvidia PTX backend Justin Bennett
18:16 RE: Enabling gcc optimization pass Grigori Fursin
18:02 New GCC ICI (with plug-ins for dynamic pass reordering) Grigori Fursin
11:43 __if_exists __if_not_exists alternative Dmitry Sychov
05:01 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? J.C. Pizarro
02:24 Haunted Halloween fun at Mountain Village 1890! Mountain Village 1890
01:15 bug in g++ front-end Alexey Starovoytov

September 14, 2007
23:15 Re: FW: Symbol Table Export From GCC? Tom Tromey
22:58 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? David Miller
22:52 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Andrew Walrond
22:46 gcc-4.3-20070914 is now available gccadmin
22:02 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? David Miller
21:41 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Andrew Walrond
21:32 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Gordan Bobic
20:00 Re: porting problem: segfault when compiling programs that call malloc Jim Wilson
18:19 Re: Bootstrap failure (on FreeBSD) Ralf Wildenhues
17:21 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? David Carlton
16:50 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell
16:28 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Joe Buck
14:17 Re: porting problem: segfault when compiling programs that call malloc Ian Lance Taylor
09:47 FW: Symbol Table Export From GCC? Gary Jackson
08:15 Re: porting problem: segfault when compiling programs that call malloc Tomas Svensson
08:04 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Kai Tietz
07:35 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Kai Tietz
06:18 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Hamish Greig
05:51 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Eric Botcazou
05:42 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Andrew Walrond
05:31 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? NightStrike
01:33 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Gabriel Dos Reis
01:00 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Andrew Pinski
00:58 Re: Any chance for intel core --march? Tim Prince
00:29 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Gabriel Dos Reis

September 13, 2007
23:38 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Andrew Pinski
22:56 Re: Does g++ have a intel/msdn __COUNTER__ macro equivalent?? Ollie Wild
22:33 Re: Does g++ have a intel/msdn __COUNTER__ macro equivalent?? Mark Mitchell
22:29 Re: Does g++ have a intel/msdn __COUNTER__ macro equivalent?? Ollie Wild
22:09 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Joseph S. Myers
21:53 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? David Miller
20:45 Re: porting problem: segfault when compiling programs that call malloc Ian Lance Taylor
20:43 Re: Any chance for intel core --march? Ian Lance Taylor
20:41 Re: Stack parameter - pass by value - frame usage Ian Lance Taylor
18:48 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell
18:44 RE: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Meissner, Michael
18:42 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Michael Meissner
18:42 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell
18:39 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell
18:37 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell
17:58 Re: GCC 4.2 Branch Status: Slush Mark Mitchell
17:31 Re: GCC 4.2 Branch Status: Slush Bob Wilson
16:00 Re: Does g++ have a intel/msdn __COUNTER__ macro equivalent?? Tom Tromey
14:56 porting problem: segfault when compiling programs that call malloc Tomas Svensson
14:02 Re: Any chance for intel core --march? Tim Prince
14:00 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Andrew Walrond
13:50 Any chance for intel core --march? René Köcher
13:01 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Sunil Amitkumar Janki
12:15 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Chris Newport
11:47 Stack parameter - pass by value - frame usage Hariharan Sandanagobalane
11:35 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Sunil Amitkumar Janki
11:15 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Andrew Walrond
10:47 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Eric Botcazou
10:34 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Andrew Walrond
10:16 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Andrew Walrond
09:58 Re: [RFC] Improve Tree-SSA if-conversion - convergence of efforts Michael Matz
09:43 Work Online From Home. Himage Holdings Ltd .
09:33 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? David Miller
09:24 Re: [RFC] Improve Tree-SSA if-conversion - convergence of efforts Richard Guenther
09:16 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Sunil Amitkumar Janki
08:46 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Jan Hubicka
06:23 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Lijuan Hai
06:03 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell

September 12, 2007
21:48 Re: [RFC] Improve Tree-SSA if-conversion - convergence of efforts trevor_smigiel
15:18 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Richard Guenther
15:14 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Ian Lance Taylor
13:28 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Tim Prince
13:25 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Gordan Bobic
13:21 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Andrew Walrond
12:26 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Ramana Radhakrishnan
12:23 Re: Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? David Miller
11:35 Is Sun putting much effort into supporting the gcc/binutils toolchain on sparc64 ? Andrew Walrond
11:02 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Kai Tietz
09:31 Re: SImode and PSImode question Andrew Pinski
09:16 Re: Bootstrap broken - treelang: error: 'treelang_expand_function' defined but not used Jan Hubicka
09:10 Re: Bootstrap broken - treelang: error: 'treelang_expand_function' defined but not used Serge Belyshev
08:01 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Richard Guenther
07:22 Bootstrap broken - treelang: error: âtreelang _expand_functionâ defined but not used Andreas Jaeger
06:26 Re: understanding __FUNCTION__ generation Sunzir Deepur
05:16 Re: Why is building a cross compiler "out-of-the-box" always broken? NightStrike
01:45 Re: gnu c reference manual : c dialects Ian Lance Taylor
01:39 Re: SImode and PSImode question DJ Delorie
01:17 Re: SImode and PSImode question Jim Wilson
01:15 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Ian Lance Taylor
00:47 Re: understanding __FUNCTION__ generation Jim Wilson

September 11, 2007
22:55 GCC 4.3.0: Stage 3 Mark Mitchell
22:53 GCC 4.2 Branch Status: Slush Mark Mitchell
22:41 Re: Does g++ have a intel/msdn __COUNTER__ macro equivalent?? Ollie Wild
22:09 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Mark Mitchell
21:58 New branch for GC work Laurynas Biveinis
21:10 Re: Does g++ have a intel/msdn __COUNTER__ macro equivalent?? Gerald Pfeifer
21:06 Re: Another BOOTSTRAP failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10, stage2 miscompiled Christian Joensson
20:58 Re: Does g++ have a intel/msdn __COUNTER__ macro equivalent?? Tom Tromey
20:14 Re: Does g++ have a intel/msdn __COUNTER__ macro equivalent?? Ollie Wild
18:40 understanding __FUNCTION__ generation Sunzir Deepur
17:43 RE: Polyhedron test: gas_dyn run-time performance regression compared with yesterday Jagasia, Harsha
16:15 RE: Polyhedron test: gas_dyn run-time performance regression compared with yesterday Jagasia, Harsha
15:57 Re: Polyhedron test: gas_dyn run-time performance regression compared with yesterday Uros Bizjak
15:04 Re: Recent (middle-end?) regressions in the Fortran testsuite Steve Kargl
14:50 Recent (middle-end?) regressions in the Fortran testsuite François-Xavier Coudert
13:16 Polyhedron test: gas_dyn run-time performance regression compared with yesterday Tobias Burnus
12:24 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Richard Guenther
12:17 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Gabriel Dos Reis
11:57 Re: error compiling libgcc with ported cross-compiler Tomas Svensson
10:18 Re: error compiling libgcc with ported cross-compiler Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
09:36 support for float/complex math in libgcc cross-compiled Tomas Svensson
09:16 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Richard Guenther
08:18 SImode and PSImode question Tal Agmon
06:57 Re: error compiling libgcc with ported cross-compiler Tomas Svensson
04:17 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Mark Mitchell
03:57 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell
03:54 Re: deadline extension for debug info project into GCC 4.3 stage3? Mark Mitchell
03:50 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell

September 10, 2007
23:36 Re: error compiling libgcc with ported cross-compiler Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
22:41 gcc-4.1-20070910 is now available gccadmin
21:32 Re: error compiling libgcc with ported cross-compiler Jim Wilson
19:01 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Martin Jambor
18:03 deadline extension for debug info project into GCC 4.3 stage3? Alexandre Oliva
17:40 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Daniel Berlin
16:37 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Michael Meissner
16:20 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Peter Bergner
16:04 RE: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Jagasia, Harsha
14:43 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Tom Tromey
13:25 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Jakub Jelinek
12:18 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Martin Jambor
11:05 Re: Bootstrap failure under Irix Philippe Schaffnit
10:22 Re: error compiling libgcc with ported cross-compiler Tomas Svensson
10:06 Re: error compiling libgcc with ported cross-compiler Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
09:59 RE: error compiling libgcc with ported cross-compiler Dave Korn
07:55 error compiling libgcc with ported cross-compiler Tomas Svensson
06:56 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Richard Guenther
02:41 GCC 4.2.2 RC1 Mark Mitchell
01:19 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Jan Hubicka
00:07 Re: Another BOOTSTRAP failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10, stage2 miscompiled John David Anglin

September 09, 2007
22:23 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Mark Mitchell
21:50 Re: Another BOOTSTRAP failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10, stage2 miscompiled David Edelsohn
21:36 Re: Bootstrap failure (on FreeBSD) Gerald Pfeifer
21:32 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Richard Guenther
21:30 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell
21:27 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Gabriel Dos Reis
21:25 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Gabriel Dos Reis
21:22 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Gabriel Dos Reis
21:19 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Richard Guenther
21:13 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Mark Mitchell
21:11 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Roger Sayle
21:05 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Mark Mitchell
21:00 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Richard Guenther
20:46 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Mark Mitchell
20:41 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Richard Guenther
20:38 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Richard Guenther
20:32 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Mark Mitchell
20:27 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Richard Guenther
20:24 Re: Some thoughts about steerring commitee work Gerald Pfeifer
20:22 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Mark Mitchell
20:08 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Richard Guenther
20:04 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Richard Guenther
19:56 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Mark Mitchell
19:51 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Richard Guenther
19:46 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell
19:45 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell
19:44 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell
19:42 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Joe Buck
19:33 Re: Another BOOTSTRAP failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10, stage2 miscompiled David Edelsohn
19:24 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Mark Mitchell
19:18 Re: Another BOOTSTRAP failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10, stage2 miscompiled Kaveh R. GHAZI
19:15 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Joe Buck
19:13 Re: Another BOOTSTRAP failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10, stage2 miscompiled David Edelsohn
19:10 Another BOOTSTRAP failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10, stage2 miscompiled Kaveh R. GHAZI
18:55 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell
18:43 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell
17:49 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Richard Guenther
17:34 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Ross Smith
17:31 Re: Which RTL pass should handle REG_EQUAL notes? Paolo Bonzini
15:57 Re: bootstrap comparision failure with --enable-targets=all on i486-linux-gnu Matthias Klose
15:44 Re: bootstrap comparision failure with --enable-targets=all on i486-linux-gnu Richard Guenther
15:40 Re: bootstrap comparision failure with --enable-targets=all on i486-linux-gnu Matthias Klose
14:40 Re: can't reinterpret_cast to/from the same type Jonathan Wakely
14:39 RE: Does g++ have a intel/msdn __COUNTER__ macro equivalent?? Gerald Pfeifer
12:47 Re: Bootstrap failure (on FreeBSD) Jan Hubicka
10:56 Which RTL pass should handle REG_EQUAL notes? Uros Bizjak
09:20 bootstrap error on ppc64 Revital1 Eres
02:38 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Gabriel Dos Reis
02:33 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Gabriel Dos Reis
02:33 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Martin Jambor
02:10 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Martin Jambor
01:44 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Martin Jambor
01:36 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Joe Buck
01:35 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Joe Buck
01:31 Re: gnu c reference manual : c dialects Joe Buck

September 08, 2007
23:57 The Linux binutils 2.18.50.0.1 is released H.J. Lu
22:28 gnu c reference manual : c dialects Trevis Rothwell
21:26 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:21 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Richard Guenther
20:17 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
20:06 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Chris Lattner
19:38 Re: can't reinterpret_cast to/from the same type Joe Buck
16:51 Re: can't reinterpret_cast to/from the same type Jonathan Wakely
14:57 RE: g++ std::max() performance Hicham Mouline
14:45 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? H.J. Lu
14:37 Re: g++ std::max() performance Paolo Carlini
14:20 g++ std::max() performance Hicham Mouline
12:37 bootstrap comparision failure with --enable-targets=all on i486-linux-gnu Matthias Klose
12:34 Re: Bootstrap failure (on FreeBSD) Matthias Klose
12:14 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
09:44 Re: Bootstrap failure (on FreeBSD) Gerald Pfeifer
09:18 Re: Bootstrap failure (on FreeBSD) Andrew Pinski
09:13 Bootstrap failure (on FreeBSD) Gerald Pfeifer
05:50 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Gabriel Dos Reis
05:12 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Joe Buck
01:30 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Chris Lattner
01:26 Re: [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Kaveh R. GHAZI

September 07, 2007
22:44 gcc-4.3-20070907 is now available gccadmin
20:54 [RFC] Marking C++ new operator as malloc? Martin Jambor
20:21 Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Art Haas
15:32 Re: RTL sharing bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Jan Hubicka
15:28 Re: RTL sharing bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Kaveh R. GHAZI
14:50 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Martin Jambor
14:47 Re: [patch] restore bootstrap on ppc darwin Jan Hubicka
13:38 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran (c_char_tests_red.f03, now PR33330) Richard Guenther
13:18 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran (c_char_tests_red.f03, now PR33330) Tim Prince
13:07 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran (c_char_tests_red.f03, now PR33330) Tobias Burnus
13:06 Re: RTL sharing bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Christian Joensson
12:47 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran (c_char_tests_red.f03, now PR33330) François-Xavier Coudert
12:39 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran (c_char_tests_red.f03, now PR33330) Dominique Dhumieres
11:54 Re: [patch] restore bootstrap on ppc darwin Dominique Dhumieres
11:38 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran (c_char_tests_red.f03, now PR33330) Dominique Dhumieres
06:03 Re: RTL sharing bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Christian Joensson
03:31 GC work status, any comments? Laurynas Biveinis
03:11 Bootstrap broke today on mipsel-linux. David Daney
02:10 Re: RTL sharing bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Kaveh R. GHAZI
01:06 Re: [RFC] missing return warnings Mark Mitchell

September 06, 2007
23:19 Re: [RFC] missing return warnings Jan Hubicka
22:54 Re: [RFC] missing return warnings Mark Mitchell
22:50 Re: [RFC] missing return warnings Jan Hubicka
21:02 Re: [RFC] missing return warnings Mark Mitchell
20:14 Re: Register allocation issues Matt Lee
20:12 Re: Register allocation issues Matt Lee
19:28 Re: RTL sharing bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Ian Lance Taylor
19:24 Re: RTL sharing bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Jan Hubicka
19:21 Re: Register allocation issues Segher Boessenkool
19:03 Re: Register allocation issues dje
18:58 Re: RTL sharing bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Ian Lance Taylor
18:46 Re: RTL sharing bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Jan Hubicka
18:29 Re: Register allocation issues Matt Lee
18:27 Re: Register allocation issues Matt Lee
18:01 Re: RTL sharing bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Ian Lance Taylor
17:53 RE: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Jagasia, Harsha
17:50 Re: RTL sharing bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Jan Hubicka
17:43 Re: RTL sharing bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Jan Hubicka
17:39 Re: Bootstrap broken: ../../gcc/gcc/ada/trans.c:5896: error: too few arguments to function `real_2expN' Janis Johnson
17:37 Re: Bootstrap failure under Irix Janis Johnson
17:33 RE: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Fu, Chao-Ying
17:23 Re: RTL sharing bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Andreas Tobler
17:19 RTL sharing bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 Kaveh R. GHAZI
17:02 [lto] project: adding --with-libelf to configure Nathan Froyd
16:42 can't reinterpret_cast to/from the same type Peter A. Felvegi
16:37 Re: Is stmt_ann()->references_memory equal to !ZERO_SSA_OPERANDS (stmt, (SSA_OP_VUSE | SSA_OP_VIRTUAL_DEFS)? Diego Novillo
16:23 Is stmt_ann()->references_memory equal to !ZERO_SSA_OPERANDS (stmt, (SSA_OP_VUSE | SSA_OP_VIRTUAL_DEFS)? Richard Guenther
16:03 Re: warnings in GCC source? Andreas Schwab
16:01 RE: warnings in GCC source? Dave Korn
15:58 ARM miscompilation of __moddi3 on trunk Andrew Haley
15:55 warnings in GCC source? Basile STARYNKEVITCH
15:14 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran Jan Hubicka
14:53 RE: Register allocation issues Dave Korn
14:15 Re: Register allocation issues David Edelsohn
13:59 Re: GCC "make" errors Tim Prince
13:38 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Sebastian Pop
13:32 Re: Bootstrap broken: ../../gcc/gcc/ada/trans.c:5896: error: too few arguments to function `real_2expN' Christian Joensson
12:45 Re: Bootstrap broken: ../../gcc/gcc/ada/trans.c:5896: error: too few arguments to function `real_2expN' Sandra Loosemore
12:35 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Jan Hubicka
10:03 Re: [RFC] missing return warnings Manuel López-Ibáñez
09:19 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran (c_char_tests_red.f03) Dominique Dhumieres
09:18 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Manuel López-Ibáñez
09:12 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Richard Guenther
09:06 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Paolo Bonzini
08:38 Re: GCC "make" errors Richard Guenther
08:29 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Richard Guenther
08:04 Bootstrap failure under Linux Philippe Schaffnit
07:55 Bootstrap broken: ../../gcc/gcc/ada/trans.c:5896: error: too few arguments to function `real_2expN' Christian Joensson
07:50 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran Dominique Dhumieres
07:47 Bootstrap failure under Irix Philippe Schaffnit
07:40 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran Jan Hubicka
07:39 Re: GCC "make" errors mandeep singh bhambra
07:01 [RFC] missing return warnings Jan Hubicka
06:11 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran Dominique Dhumieres
06:03 Re: VM/Back-end Basile STARYNKEVITCH
06:00 Bootstrap broken at stage1 Dominique Dhumieres
01:10 Re: Register allocation issues Ian Lance Taylor
00:47 VM/Back-end Mike
00:07 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran Jan Hubicka

September 05, 2007
22:47 Register allocation issues Matt Lee
22:44 gcc-4.2-20070905 is now available gccadmin
22:32 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) DJ Delorie
22:25 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell
18:33 question about comment buglet Tom Tromey
17:24 Re: [PATCH PR31490] Re: another build failure on ppc64-linux Richard Sandiford
17:18 Re: [PATCH PR31490] Re: another build failure on ppc64-linux Richard Sandiford
16:37 Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report Joe Buck
16:27 Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10 Art Haas
16:14 Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report Richard Kenner
16:00 Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report Joe Buck
15:54 Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report Mark Mitchell
14:12 Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report Richard Guenther
14:05 Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report Daniel Berlin
12:34 Re: GCC Plugin Branch Brendon Costa
12:09 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran Tobias Schlüter
11:57 Re: GCC "make" errors Richard Guenther
11:53 Re: GCC "make" errors mandeep singh bhambra
10:55 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran Jan Hubicka
10:46 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran François-Xavier Coudert
10:34 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran Jan Hubicka
10:22 Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report Joseph S. Myers
09:46 Re: GCC Plugin Branch Ben Elliston
09:39 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran François-Xavier Coudert
09:19 Re: IA64 optimizations.. Andrey Belevantsev
09:11 Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report Richard Guenther
03:50 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) DJ Delorie
03:45 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran Steve Kargl
03:38 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran Steve Kargl
03:35 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell
03:24 Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) DJ Delorie
02:49 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran Steve Kargl
02:40 GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04) Mark Mitchell
01:57 Re: DFA Scheduler - unable to pipeline loads Adam Nemet
01:28 Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report Daniel Berlin
01:22 GCC 4.2.2 Status Report Mark Mitchell
00:03 Re: DFA Scheduler - unable to pipeline loads Matt Lee

September 04, 2007
22:41 Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran Jan Hubicka
22:35 Someone has caused regressions in gfortran Steve Kargl
21:17 Re: bootstrap failing on ppc linux (fixed) Dominique Dhumieres
21:15 GLIBCXX_ dependency S.Mohideen
19:30 Re: bootstrap failing on ppc linux Dominique Dhumieres
18:40 Re: DFA Scheduler - unable to pipeline loads Matt Lee
18:27 bootstrap failing on ppc linux Razya Ladelsky
17:16 Re: Wrong lib address Ian Lance Taylor
15:23 Re: Re[2]: [GSoC: DDG export][RFC] Current status Zdenek Dvorak
15:04 IA64 optimizations.. Kumar Rangarajan
14:37 Re: [PATCH PR31490] Re: another build failure on ppc64-linux Richard Guenther
10:47 RE: Does g++ have a intel/msdn __COUNTER__ macro equivalent?? Dave Korn
10:26 Does g++ have a intel/msdn __COUNTER__ macro equivalent?? me

September 03, 2007
22:44 gcc-4.1-20070903 is now available gccadmin
21:20 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Richard Guenther
18:30 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Daniel Berlin
18:18 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Tim Prince
17:25 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Paul Brook
17:16 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Mark Mitchell
14:34 About allocating registers for instrumentation 吴曦
14:34 has_volatile_ops and early optimization w/o alias information Richard Guenther
09:55 Re: question about rtl loop-iv analysis Dorit Nuzman
09:48 Re: DFA Scheduler - unable to pipeline loads Maxim Kuvyrkov
09:44 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Joseph S. Myers
09:36 RE: DFA Scheduler - unable to pipeline loads Ye, Joey
08:55 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Richard Guenther
04:36 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Mark Mitchell
04:03 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Daniel Berlin
00:01 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Paul Brook

September 02, 2007
22:16 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Richard Guenther
22:07 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Daniel Berlin
19:12 [PATCH PR31490] Re: another build failure on ppc64-linux Segher Boessenkool
13:25 A script to create templates for a new port kai-gcc

September 01, 2007
23:30 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Richard Guenther
21:40 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Mark Mitchell
20:26 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Mark Mitchell
18:18 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Richard Guenther
18:17 Re: (gcc 4.2) how to create an ADDR_EXPR that refers to a linkage name? Gary Funck
17:43 Re: (gcc 4.2) how to create an ADDR_EXPR that refers to a linkage name? Diego Novillo
17:26 (gcc 4.2) how to create an ADDR_EXPR that refers to a linkage name? Gary Funck
15:48 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Mark Mitchell
12:01 GCC Plugin Branch Brendon Costa
09:58 Build failure on Darwin, revision 127998 (solved) Dominique Dhumieres
08:52 Re: RFC: Hack to make restrict more useful Richard Guenther
00:38 Re: Stage 2 project: new interference graph representation. Kenneth Zadeck


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3