This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: [wwwdocs] Patch for RE: Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option

From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
To: "'Gerald Pfeifer'" <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, "'Joseph S. Myers'" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, "'Sandra Loosemore'" <sandra at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:45:32 +0100
Subject: RE: [wwwdocs] Patch for RE: Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709141157300.11229@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709171123520.29659@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <46EE7009.9020500@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709200030000.26054@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

On 19 September 2007 23:31, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

> I am committing the patch below to our coding conventions and will fix
> up the existing web pages accordingly.

  Amusingly enough, this just came out today:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7004661.stm


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....

References:
- Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option
  - From: Sandra Loosemore
- [wwwdocs] Patch for RE: Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]