This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFH: GPLv3

Hash: SHA1

Richard Guenther wrote:

>> | It has also not yet been decided whether backports of bug-fixes from
>> | GPLv3 versions of GCC to older GPLv2 versions of GCC (e.g., GCC 4.1)
>> We can make a final release from GCC-4.1.x and close it definitely.
>> We should strive for some kind of mononiticy in terms of release
>> series and licensing.
> We can just close the branch.  Though I expect vendors to continue to need
> to maintain it for another 5+ years.  Maybe we can get mutual agreement
> from contributors to re-license their contributions to currently active
> branches
> under GPL v2 as well and this way side-stepping the FSF on this matter.

This sounds ideal, but I'm concerned a little bit about how this interacts
with the copyright assignment to FSF. When a contributor assigns copyright
to FSF, do they still have the right to license their changes separately?

- --BDS

- --

Benjamin Smedberg
Platform Guru
Mozilla Corporation
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]