This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>, Doug Gregor <doug dot gregor at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 14:13:42 -0700
Subject: Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?
References: <24b520d20703121113y61cd3911odd9c385ff775dfb9@mail.gmail.com> <45F5BB1A.40803@suse.de> <de8d50360703121347p3b93a99ftf7ca4916a4b24d83@mail.gmail.com>

On Mar 12, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:

Can I recommend something just crazy, rewrite the C++ front-end so they don't use the tree structure at all except when lowering until gimple like the rest of the GCC front-ends?

:-) I don't have any objections, as long as people can keep the compilation speed up, though, sounds like a bit of work. I'd look towards a project architect to help steer us towards goodness and keep us out of trouble. I can see some advantage to having a cleaner boundary between the front-ends and the mid-end.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

References:
- We're out of tree codes; now what?
  - From: Doug Gregor
- Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]