This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: We're out of tree codes; now what?


"Steven Bosscher" <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com> writes:

| On 3/12/07, Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> wrote:
| > we are unavoidably
| > adding tree codes and we must solve the issue, one way or another.
| 
| Another real solution would perhaps be to not use 'tree' for front end
| specific data structures in C++, and instead just define g++ specific
| data structures to represent all the language details ;-)

that strickes me as a far better, long term solution; however, it
requires much larger efforts.  
Traditional, we tend to favor short term solutions... 

| G++ needs 64 (!) language specific tree codes, almost 7 times more
| than any other front end, and in total more than twice as many as all
| other front ends (java, ada, and objc)  together.

yet, some of us think it does not have enough ;-)

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]