This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Signed overflow patches OK for 4.2?

From: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: "Ian Lance Taylor" <iant at google dot com>
Cc: "Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:04:59 -0800
Subject: Re: Signed overflow patches OK for 4.2?
References: <m38xebmpez.fsf@localhost.localdomain>

On 05 Mar 2007 12:00:20 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:

This would be a new feature for 4.2, of course.  Is it OK to do the
backport?


Way too late.  Didn't Mark say he wanted to release a prelease soon?
Also isn't there still some regressions associated still with this change?
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-03/msg00120.html> for the reference of
the regressions.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Signed overflow patches OK for 4.2?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- Signed overflow patches OK for 4.2?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]