This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: Marcin Dalecki <martin at dalecki dot de>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, david dot carlton at sun dot com (David Carlton)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:20:08 -0800
Subject: Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer
References: <200701240332.l0O3WDP9024866@localhost.localdomain> <CB9C3E1C-B7BE-46F1-83B7-86F62C26EC62@dalecki.de> <4117AD05-41AF-4C04-B526-6C52F14E69BA@apple.com> <9F91059E-E9B4-4439-AA14-60C05EE6A148@dalecki.de>

On Jan 24, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Marcin Dalecki wrote:

This argument fails (trivially) on the assumption that there is an incremental way ("fixes") to improve it in time not exceeding the expected remaining life span of a developer.

I welcome your existence proof for just one piece that can't be fixed incrementally.

References:
- Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer
  - From: Marcin Dalecki
- Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: [RFC] Our release cycles are getting longer
  - From: Marcin Dalecki

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]