This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: John Love-Jensen <eljay at adobe dot com>
Cc: "Gaurav Gautam, Noida" <gauravga at noida dot hcltech dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,MSX to GCC <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:14:09 -0400
Subject: Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
References: <40CC5CC7CDACC048B1299C57025E330CFD6CC2@HSDLNTD1110010.noida.hcltech.com> <BF58392B.1F64%eljay@adobe.com>

On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 10:34:19AM -0500, John Love-Jensen wrote:
> Hi Gaurav,
> 
> >Please confirm which of the two outputs is correct and why is there a
> difference in the output of two versions of compiler?
> 
> Both outputs are "correct".
> 
> (Neither output is compliant to the standard, of course, as -fshort-enums is
> a deviation from the standard.)

That's incorrect, please read my response again.  The current output is
C99-conformant.

(It is surprising, though, on many non-embedded targets.  For instance
there are considerable difficulties using this option on GNU/Linux.)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

References:
- RE: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
  - From: Gaurav Gautam, Noida
- Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
  - From: John Love-Jensen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]