gcc archive
author index for September, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

Christian Schüler

• 2005-09-03 21:57 Successful 4.0.1 build

Rafael Espíndola

• 2005-09-13 19:23 coding style: type* variable or type *varible
• 2005-09-13 20:38 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible

Tobias Schlüter

• 2005-09-14 08:36 Re: help: interfacing between C and fortran program

Actualizacion para Servidores Publicos

• 2005-09-08 21:45 Conocimientos Estrategicos en la Administracion Publica //*059835363179ant

aetherane (sent by Nabble.com)

• 2005-09-25 09:28 Compile Without Libc
• 2005-09-29 19:31 Computed Values in Preprocessor

Alan Modra

• 2005-09-02 08:58 Re: [mainline/tree-profiling] CFG transparend finish_eh_generation
• 2005-09-02 09:36 Re: [mainline/tree-profiling] CFG transparend finish_eh_generation
• 2005-09-07 03:49 Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-09 15:30 [PowerPC] PR23774 stack backchain broken saga
• 2005-09-10 03:27 Re: [PowerPC] PR23774 stack backchain broken saga
• 2005-09-13 11:23 Re: [PowerPC] PR23774 stack backchain broken saga

Alexandre Oliva

• 2005-09-14 17:16 Re: When is it legal to compare any pair of pointers?
• 2005-09-15 14:03 Re: checksum files not ^C safe
• 2005-09-15 14:05 Re: When is it legal to compare any pair of pointers?
• 2005-09-16 05:11 RFC: TLS improvements for IA32 and AMD64/EM64T

Alisdair Meredith

• 2005-09-24 13:43 Re: constructors and multiple entry points
• 2005-09-24 14:29 Re: constructors and multiple entry points

Andreas Jaeger

• 2005-09-03 12:15 Re: Ada testsuite issues with c74004a, c940010, c94002f, and c94002g... (and more?)
• 2005-09-04 04:38 Re: Ada testsuite issues with c74004a, c940010, c94002f, and c94002g... (and more?)
• 2005-09-29 07:30 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)

Andreas Krebbel

• 2005-09-02 08:08 Re: [4.0] libgfortran/io/read.c:230: error: invalid storage class for function 'eat_leading_spaces'
• 2005-09-05 12:32 S/390 Bootstrap failure due to fixup_eh_region_note
• 2005-09-23 13:55 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc

Andreas Schwab

• 2005-09-19 19:20 Re: "gcc -pipe" and ld
• 2005-09-21 15:42 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-27 15:08 Re: query: -fshort-enums is default on which targets ?

Andreas Tobler

• 2005-09-15 05:43 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
• 2005-09-15 21:15 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
• 2005-09-19 05:32 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2

Andrew Haley

• 2005-09-07 17:18 Re: Question regarding compiling a toolchain for a Broadcom SB1
• 2005-09-09 10:55 uncaught exception in g++ 3.4 and 4.0
• 2005-09-22 09:09 Re: warning about classpath import

Andrew MacLeod

• 2005-09-18 13:13 Re: Cost of having an immediate use in the phi argument

Andrew Morrow

• 2005-09-23 15:31 gcc-4.0.2: supporting -fvisibility for solaris ld

Andrew Pinski

• 2005-09-01 20:23 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
• 2005-09-05 14:15 Re: S/390 Bootstrap failure due to fixup_eh_region_note
• 2005-09-05 15:38 Re: libssp missing from CVS
• 2005-09-06 02:31 Re: S/390 Bootstrap failure due to fixup_eh_region_note
• 2005-09-06 03:39 Re: S/390 Bootstrap failure due to fixup_eh_region_note
• 2005-09-06 09:23 Re: S/390 Bootstrap failure due to fixup_eh_region_note
• 2005-09-06 13:17 Re: Store-copyprop not very bright
• 2005-09-07 16:31 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status Report
• 2005-09-09 05:52 Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-09 13:04 Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
• 2005-09-09 21:24 Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
• 2005-09-09 21:33 Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
• 2005-09-14 18:57 Re: Gcc 4.0.2 RC1 checking not disabled?
• 2005-09-14 20:02 Re: Symbolic replacement
• 2005-09-15 04:50 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency
• 2005-09-15 18:37 Re: RFC: dbxout_type rewrite
• 2005-09-19 04:56 Re: Gcc 4.1 has been failing SPEC CPU 2000 on 64bit platforms
• 2005-09-19 15:05 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 17:51 Re: constructors and multiple entry points
• 2005-09-19 20:13 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
• 2005-09-19 20:24 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
• 2005-09-20 14:38 Re: Failure to build gcc cvs trunk on cygwin:
• 2005-09-20 15:09 Re: fortran-testcase/dce question
• 2005-09-20 15:10 Re: fortran-testcase/dce question
• 2005-09-22 20:27 Re: [RFC] patch to fix an ICE involving sign-extract of mmx expression
• 2005-09-23 22:10 Re: Question about the use of builtins in altivec.h
• 2005-09-30 17:50 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?

Andrew Walrond

• 2005-09-02 10:58 Re: Problem building 3.3.6 (with 3.4.4): xgcc: cannot specify -o with -c or -S and multiple compilations

Andrey Belevantsev

• 2005-09-02 12:38 [GCC 4.2 Project] Support for IA-64 speculation
• 2005-09-16 07:44 Re: Where are the fortran test results for cv strunk?

Arnaud Charlet

• 2005-09-03 17:13 Re: Ada testsuite issues with c74004a, c940010, c94002f, and c94002g... (and more?)
• 2005-09-29 07:16 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)

Ashwin Bharambe

• 2005-09-12 19:30 Separating c++ parser
• 2005-09-12 19:55 Re: Separating c++ parser

Audison Athena

• 2005-09-24 16:01 A peculiar problem

Ben Elliston

• 2005-09-21 04:22 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-26 03:00 Re: g++.dg not having one .exp per directory

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2005-09-21 15:32 Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993
• 2005-09-22 18:27 Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993
• 2005-09-23 18:34 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3

Benjamin Redelings

• 2005-09-30 22:31 Error: Local symbol '.LTHUNK0' can't be equated to ......

Bernd Jendrissek

• 2005-09-30 14:43 TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT(bitsizetype) one-liner

Bernd Schmidt

• 2005-09-27 20:43 Re: reload-branch created

Bernhard R. Link

• 2005-09-23 09:16 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug

Brian Dessent

• 2005-09-06 03:58 pr 22207: Spurious 'might be used uninitialized' warnings

bud davis

• 2005-09-09 14:28 g77 and PR21931

caj

• 2005-09-25 20:14 Re: System header warning exemptions and delta debugging don't mix well

Chance

• 2005-09-13 21:04 The Next Dynamite stock?

Chase

• 2005-09-30 03:33 Windows GUI apps cross-compiled from Linux or Mac OS X?

chris jefferson

• 2005-09-13 10:22 When is it legal to compare any pair of pointers?
• 2005-09-20 14:07 Re: How set an iterator to NULL

Christian Joensson

• 2005-09-02 06:57 [4.0] libgfortran/io/read.c:230: error: invalid storage class for function 'eat_leading_spaces'
• 2005-09-03 07:12 Ada testsuite issues with c74004a, c940010, c94002f, and c94002g... (and more?)
• 2005-09-16 05:47 Where are the fortran test results for cv strunk?
• 2005-09-16 07:35 Re: Where are the fortran test results for cv strunk?
• 2005-09-16 09:22 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
• 2005-09-20 11:47 Failure to build gcc cvs trunk on cygwin:
• 2005-09-22 19:35 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3
• 2005-09-23 17:21 [4.0] version '400p', expected version '400*'
• 2005-09-23 17:25 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3
• 2005-09-24 08:44 Re: [4.0] version '400p', expected version '400*'
• 2005-09-25 08:30 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3
• 2005-09-25 08:30 Re: [4.0] version '400p', expected version '400*'
• 2005-09-28 12:04 Error detected at make.adb:7224:23
• 2005-09-28 12:44 Re: Error detected at make.adb:7224:23
• 2005-09-28 14:18 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status
• 2005-09-28 19:10 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status
• 2005-09-29 17:10 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)
• 2005-09-30 04:30 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released

Christopher Faylor

• 2005-09-02 18:04 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows
• 2005-09-14 19:33 Re: Any plan to support Windows/x86-64?
• 2005-09-15 00:47 Re: PING [4.1 regression, patch] build i686-pc-mingw32
• 2005-09-19 16:09 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows

Clemens Koller

• 2005-09-09 09:19 Re: Support for the MPC5554 in gcc ?
• 2005-09-09 09:21 Re: Support for the MPC5554 in gcc ?
• 2005-09-29 10:22 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
• 2005-09-29 12:41 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released (successful build)

Dale Johannesen

• 2005-09-11 17:25 Re: rtl line no
• 2005-09-15 01:21 RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency
• 2005-09-15 18:07 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency
• 2005-09-20 00:19 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency
• 2005-09-20 00:34 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency
• 2005-09-20 17:23 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency
• 2005-09-30 19:53 x86 SSE constants
• 2005-09-30 23:32 Re: x86 SSE constants

Daniel Berlin

• 2005-09-07 16:39 Re: existing functionality questions
• 2005-09-07 17:32 Re: existing functionality questions
• 2005-09-09 13:11 Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
• 2005-09-09 13:52 Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
• 2005-09-13 21:12 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible
• 2005-09-14 16:06 Re: Corrupted CVS respository?
• 2005-09-17 18:59 Cost of having an immediate use in the phi argument
• 2005-09-18 15:26 Re: Cost of having an immediate use in the phi argument
• 2005-09-18 20:24 Re: data dependence for pointers broken?
• 2005-09-18 20:27 Re: data dependence for pointers broken?
• 2005-09-18 20:47 [PATCH]: Re: data dependence for pointers broken?
• 2005-09-19 13:01 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 13:03 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 13:23 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 14:05 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 21:40 Re: [gelato-gcc] 15 Sept notes from GCC improvement for Itaniumconference call
• 2005-09-20 02:05 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency
• 2005-09-20 13:54 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency
• 2005-09-20 17:57 Re: Build DDG from multiple BBs
• 2005-09-21 14:20 Re: unwind-dw2-fde.c failed on my port
• 2005-09-22 13:40 Re: [gomp] implement a handfull of easy directives
• 2005-09-23 02:14 Re: [RFC] propagating loop dependences from trees to RTL (for SMS)
• 2005-09-23 14:06 Re: Problem with the special live analyzer in global alloc
• 2005-09-25 14:55 Re: PATCH RFC: Increase support for restrict qualifier
• 2005-09-30 00:33 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?
• 2005-09-30 13:32 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?
• 2005-09-30 13:56 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?
• 2005-09-30 14:32 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?
• 2005-09-30 15:03 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?
• 2005-09-30 15:31 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?
• 2005-09-30 17:06 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2005-09-06 02:11 Re: glibc or newlib for mips-elf?
• 2005-09-14 01:27 Re: When is it legal to compare any pair of pointers?
• 2005-09-14 13:20 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation
• 2005-09-16 20:18 Re: problems in C functions call C++
• 2005-09-19 18:11 Re: constructors and multiple entry points
• 2005-09-21 12:39 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-21 14:19 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-21 17:26 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-22 16:15 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-22 18:31 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-26 21:15 Re: reload-branch created (was: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0)
• 2005-09-30 17:47 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
• 2005-09-30 18:05 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
• 2005-09-30 21:06 Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers

Daniel Kegel

• 2005-09-08 17:34 Re: Question regarding compiling a toolchain for a Broadcom SB1

Daniel Towner

• 2005-09-01 10:13 Incorrect use of anti-dependency to order instructions in the DFAscheduler
• 2005-09-05 12:55 Re: Incorrect use of anti-dependency to order instructions in theDFA scheduler
• 2005-09-12 15:32 New port contribution - picoChip
• 2005-09-28 12:11 Re: New port contribution - picoChip

dank

• 2005-09-24 09:12 System header warning exemptions and delta debugging don't mix well

Dave Korn

• 2005-09-01 10:16 RE: porting gcc can't compile libgcc2.c
• 2005-09-09 13:36 RE: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
• 2005-09-12 17:08 RE: New port contribution - picoChip
• 2005-09-12 18:04 RE: New port contribution - picoChip
• 2005-09-14 10:02 RE: When is it legal to compare any pair of pointers?
• 2005-09-14 10:10 RE: coding style: type* variable or type *varible
• 2005-09-14 18:54 RE: Gcc 4.0.2 RC1 checking not disabled?
• 2005-09-14 19:18 RE: Gcc 4.0.2 RC1 checking not disabled?
• 2005-09-15 14:11 RE: lib2funcs and fpbit both rely on each other
• 2005-09-15 15:43 RE: "TCP retransmission" in Downloading from GDB
• 2005-09-19 10:34 RE: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 11:48 RE: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 14:10 RE: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 19:35 RE: "gcc -pipe" and ld
• 2005-09-20 11:43 RE: Calling functions on x86
• 2005-09-22 10:38 RE: warning about classpath import
• 2005-09-22 14:42 RE: warning about classpath import
• 2005-09-22 16:20 RE: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-23 09:34 RE: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?

Dave Scop

• 2005-09-14 19:10 Request link to www.devicetools.com

David Daney

• 2005-09-06 18:41 Re: glibc or newlib for mips-elf?
• 2005-09-07 17:38 Re: Question regarding compiling a toolchain for a Broadcom SB1
• 2005-09-21 22:57 Re: warning about classpath import
• 2005-09-23 23:23 Re: c++ default operators

David Edelsohn

• 2005-09-08 18:05 Re: Support for the MPC5554 in gcc ?
• 2005-09-09 14:36 Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-12 15:44 Re: New port contribution - picoChip
• 2005-09-12 18:01 Re: New port contribution - picoChip
• 2005-09-17 14:44 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
• 2005-09-20 19:08 Re: Question on syntax in machine description files.
• 2005-09-30 21:10 Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers
• 2005-09-30 22:39 Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers

Devang Patel

• 2005-09-15 18:26 RFC: dbxout_type rewrite
• 2005-09-16 20:27 Re: RFC: dbxout_type rewrite
• 2005-09-23 01:50 Re: [RFC] propagating loop dependences from trees to RTL (for SMS)
• 2005-09-23 17:15 Re: [RFC] propagating loop dependences from trees to RTL (for SMS)

Diego Novillo

• 2005-09-08 14:10 Re: More on vrp_meet
• 2005-09-08 14:27 Re: Possible bug in tree-vrp.c:vrp_visit_phi_node
• 2005-09-08 14:51 Re: Possible bug in tree-vrp.c:vrp_visit_phi_node
• 2005-09-08 15:33 Re: Possible bug in tree-vrp.c:vrp_visit_phi_node
• 2005-09-09 15:09 Re: Possible bug in tree-vrp.c:vrp_visit_phi_node
• 2005-09-12 19:50 Re: Separating c++ parser
• 2005-09-12 20:07 Re: Separating c++ parser
• 2005-09-14 16:00 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible
• 2005-09-15 21:12 Duplicate dump file numbers
• 2005-09-26 13:51 Re: Gomp and C++?
• 2005-09-28 18:03 RFC: Adding test cases from the OpenMP standard spec
• 2005-09-30 13:26 Re: [gomp] build problem

DJ Delorie

• 2005-09-02 05:11 sign/zero extending pointer offsets?
• 2005-09-03 01:40 insv vs one-bit fields
• 2005-09-03 15:35 Re: Problems with the m32c target and M16C6N cpu
• 2005-09-05 00:48 Re: insv vs one-bit fields
• 2005-09-05 03:11 Re: insv vs one-bit fields
• 2005-09-05 03:43 Re: insv vs one-bit fields
• 2005-09-07 14:46 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-09-06)
• 2005-09-09 18:08 Re: question about linker
• 2005-09-14 00:37 regmove fixups vs pseudos
• 2005-09-14 13:15 Re: regmove fixups vs pseudos
• 2005-09-21 19:53 Re: Warning C vs C++

Dorit Naishlos

• 2005-09-07 12:28 [4.2 projects] vectorization enhancements
• 2005-09-20 06:57 fortran-testcase/dce question
• 2005-09-21 07:49 Re: fortran-testcase/dce question

e . coullien

• 2005-09-08 12:07 How to extract symbol type
• 2005-09-15 15:36 "TCP retransmission" in Downloading from GDB

Ed Smith-Rowland

• 2005-09-08 23:36 Should Objective-C++ be mentioned in the 4.1 changes.

Eduardo Restuccia

• 2005-09-15 13:21 GCC 4.0.1 build succeeded using Fedora Core 4

Eric Botcazou

• 2005-09-16 21:27 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
• 2005-09-19 10:16 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 18:10 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
• 2005-09-19 20:04 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
• 2005-09-19 20:21 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
• 2005-09-19 20:46 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
• 2005-09-21 14:28 Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993
• 2005-09-22 18:21 Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993
• 2005-09-22 18:24 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3
• 2005-09-22 18:39 Questionable code in fixup_reorder_chain
• 2005-09-23 14:19 Re: Questionable code in fixup_reorder_chain
• 2005-09-29 17:04 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)
• 2005-09-29 22:13 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)
• 2005-09-30 22:58 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released

Eric Christopher

• 2005-09-07 01:30 Re: glibc or newlib for mips-elf?
• 2005-09-07 01:59 Re: Question regarding compiling a toolchain for a Broadcom SB1
• 2005-09-07 02:30 Re: Language Changes in Bug-fix Releases?
• 2005-09-09 18:06 Re: question about linker
• 2005-09-09 18:08 Re: Question regarding compiling a toolchain for a Broadcom SB1
• 2005-09-13 03:03 Re: Adding debug symbols causes segmentation faults with GCC-4.1 and MIPS...
• 2005-09-13 03:36 Re: Adding debug symbols causes segmentation faults with GCC-4.1 and MIPS...
• 2005-09-15 05:43 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-15 19:04 Re: RFC: dbxout_type rewrite

Eric Fisher

• 2005-09-01 08:43 porting gcc can't compile libgcc2.c
• 2005-09-06 01:48 glibc or newlib for mips-elf?
• 2005-09-06 02:20 glibc or newlib for mips-elf?
• 2005-09-07 01:19 glibc or newlib for mips-elf?
• 2005-09-07 01:39 Re: glibc or newlib for mips-elf?
• 2005-09-09 01:52 a question about floating point register
• 2005-09-09 03:41 a question about floating point register
• 2005-09-12 07:34 software floating point & machine descriptions
• 2005-09-15 03:24 where is the floatsidf?
• 2005-09-15 03:56 where is the floatsidf?
• 2005-09-15 09:59 lib2funcs and fpbit both rely on each other
• 2005-09-16 02:27 Re: lib2funcs and fpbit both rely on each other
• 2005-09-20 04:59 unwind-dw2-fde.c failed on my port
• 2005-09-21 08:41 unwind-dw2-fde.c failed on my port
• 2005-09-27 02:34 fixed registers in mips

Erik Leunissen

• 2005-09-19 18:18 "gcc -pipe" and ld

Ernest L. Williams Jr.

• 2005-09-21 02:21 Problem with gcc 4.0.1
• 2005-09-21 11:10 Re: Problem with gcc 4.0.1

Etienne Lorrain

• 2005-09-09 10:08 gcc-4.0-20050908 is now available
• 2005-09-10 13:07 RE: gcc-4.0-20050908 is now available
• 2005-09-19 12:23 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
• 2005-09-19 12:58 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2

Evan Cheng

• 2005-09-29 20:48 Should -msse3 enable fisttp

f11235813

• 2005-09-30 13:16 [gomp] build problem

Fariborz Jahanian

• 2005-09-12 20:03 Re: Separating c++ parser
• 2005-09-15 23:48 Can we have a symbol_ref node of a declared symbol without having its flags set?
• 2005-09-22 20:23 [RFC] patch to fix an ICE involving sign-extract of mmx expression
• 2005-09-23 20:30 Re: [RFC] patch to fix an ICE involving sign-extract of mmx expression
• 2005-09-26 16:05 Re: [RFC] patch to fix an ICE involving sign-extract of mmx expression

Florian Weimer

• 2005-09-18 16:54 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-18 16:59 Re: pointer checking run time code
• 2005-09-19 10:33 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?

Frank Ch. Eigler

• 2005-09-01 14:54 Re: Selective Mudflap
• 2005-09-02 15:03 Re: Selective Mudflap

frankj

• 2005-09-01 05:47 Re: Successfull gcc-3.4.4 build on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20

Fred Fish

• 2005-09-01 23:35 Re: MASK_GNU_AS == MASK_GAS

fvzeppelin

• 2005-09-03 09:33 Problems with the m32c target and M16C6N cpu

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2005-09-01 23:17 G++ question
• 2005-09-06 13:07 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 13:36 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 14:14 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-07 01:17 Re: Language Changes in Bug-fix Releases?
• 2005-09-07 02:06 Re: Language Changes in Bug-fix Releases?
• 2005-09-09 14:24 Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
• 2005-09-16 18:58 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-16 20:44 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-17 04:31 Re: [PATCH] fix warnings in treelang/parse.y
• 2005-09-17 14:23 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-17 15:18 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-17 15:20 Re: [PATCH] fix warnings in treelang/parse.y
• 2005-09-17 16:11 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-17 16:15 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-17 22:34 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-18 01:11 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-18 18:31 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-19 09:49 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 10:29 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 11:09 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 11:10 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 12:59 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 13:01 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 13:17 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 17:45 constructors and multiple entry points
• 2005-09-19 18:16 Re: constructors and multiple entry points
• 2005-09-19 18:22 Re: constructors and multiple entry points
• 2005-09-19 19:32 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-20 00:39 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-20 06:44 Re: constructors and multiple entry points
• 2005-09-22 16:26 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-22 16:41 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-23 02:27 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-24 14:07 Re: constructors and multiple entry points
• 2005-09-24 15:04 Re: constructors and multiple entry points

Garc˙ffffffffffeda

• 2005-09-03 17:05 GCC 4.0.1 bootstrap successfully built and installed

Gaurav Gautam, Noida

• 2005-09-14 06:40 help: interfacing between C and fortran program
• 2005-09-21 12:17 No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-21 13:35 RE: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-22 13:40 RE: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-23 14:06 RE: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-27 13:06 query: -fshort-enums is default on which targets ?

Gcc K6 testing account

• 2005-09-14 18:43 Gcc 4.0.2 RC1 checking not disabled?
• 2005-09-14 19:18 RE: Gcc 4.0.2 RC1 checking not disabled?

gccadmin

• 2005-09-01 23:53 gcc-4.0-20050901 is now available
• 2005-09-02 11:35 gcc-4.1-20050902 is now available
• 2005-09-07 00:20 gcc-3.4-20050906 is now available
• 2005-09-09 01:05 gcc-4.0-20050908 is now available
• 2005-09-09 11:34 gcc-4.1-20050909 is now available
• 2005-09-14 00:40 gcc-3.4-20050913 is now available
• 2005-09-17 18:12 gcc-4.1-20050917 is now available
• 2005-09-20 23:57 gcc-3.4-20050920 is now available
• 2005-09-23 00:00 gcc-4.0-20050922 is now available
• 2005-09-24 18:06 gcc-4.1-20050924 is now available
• 2005-09-28 00:02 gcc-3.4-20050927 is now available
• 2005-09-30 01:19 gcc-4.0-20050929 is now available

Geoff Keating

• 2005-09-16 18:29 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)

Geoffrey Keating

• 2005-09-12 23:40 Re: Minimum/maximum operators are deprecated?
• 2005-09-15 06:55 Re: checksum files not ^C safe
• 2005-09-16 08:50 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-16 09:53 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-16 20:14 Re: RFC: dbxout_type rewrite
• 2005-09-16 20:14 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-23 00:18 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)

George White

• 2005-09-30 23:43 incompatible 'improvements'

george young

• 2005-09-22 19:46 bad web link on mirrors page

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2005-09-05 10:53 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
• 2005-09-13 16:23 Re: mirror question
• 2005-09-13 16:28 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via GelatoFederation
• 2005-09-14 09:22 Re: gccadmin's crontab
• 2005-09-17 22:53 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows
• 2005-09-19 10:47 Re: New port contribution - picoChip
• 2005-09-19 12:20 Re: New port contribution - picoChip
• 2005-09-19 13:31 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows
• 2005-09-22 14:51 Re: warning about classpath import
• 2005-09-24 17:40 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
• 2005-09-25 22:55 Re: bad web link on mirrors page

Giovanni Bajo

• 2005-09-03 14:42 Re: Language Changes in Bug-fix Releases?
• 2005-09-06 13:35 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-09 17:27 Re: sh64 support deteriorating
• 2005-09-11 20:06 Re: Minimum/maximum operators are deprecated?
• 2005-09-12 16:56 Re: New port contribution - picoChip
• 2005-09-12 17:35 Re: New port contribution - picoChip
• 2005-09-14 10:40 Re: regmove fixups vs pseudos
• 2005-09-15 15:58 Re: "TCP retransmission" in Downloading from GDB
• 2005-09-19 10:40 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 10:50 Re: New port contribution - picoChip
• 2005-09-19 11:30 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 14:11 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-20 13:44 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency
• 2005-09-21 15:48 Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993

girish vaitheeswaran

• 2005-09-01 21:19 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use

Greg McGary

• 2005-09-24 22:36 Insn for direct increment of memory?
• 2005-09-24 22:58 Re: Insn for direct increment of memory?

Gunther Piez

• 2005-09-10 11:49 Minimum/maximum operators are deprecated?
• 2005-09-11 02:03 Re: Minimum/maximum operators are deprecated?

H. J. Lu

• 2005-09-12 16:46 Any plan to support Windows/x86-64?
• 2005-09-14 15:55 Corrupted CVS respository?
• 2005-09-19 04:47 Gcc 4.1 has been failing SPEC CPU 2000 on 64bit platforms
• 2005-09-27 17:55 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status
• 2005-09-29 19:48 3.3/3.4 HOT_TEXT_SECTION_NAME problem
• 2005-09-30 18:01 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released

Hank Kester

• 2005-09-23 01:16 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?

Haren Visavadia

• 2005-09-30 16:50 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released

Hitha Nambiar

• 2005-09-20 06:07 installing problem

Humberto Rocha

• 2005-09-27 00:25 DERIVED_FROM_P
• 2005-09-30 01:12 root tree gcc

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2005-09-01 18:12 Re: Incorrect use of anti-dependency to order instructions in the DFA scheduler
• 2005-09-01 18:19 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
• 2005-09-02 17:42 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
• 2005-09-06 17:54 Re: glibc or newlib for mips-elf?
• 2005-09-06 18:05 Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-06 22:58 Re: pr 22207: Spurious 'might be used uninitialized' warnings
• 2005-09-07 04:42 Re: some seemingly redundant register uses in nios gcc compiled assembly code
• 2005-09-07 16:15 Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-07 17:15 Re: Question regarding compiling a toolchain for a Broadcom SB1
• 2005-09-08 21:01 Re: Question regarding compiling a toolchain for a Broadcom SB1
• 2005-09-09 05:25 Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-09 06:14 Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-09 07:12 Re: PATCH RFC: Proposed patch for PR c++/7874
• 2005-09-09 07:15 Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-09 18:27 Re: PATCH RFC: Proposed patch for PR c++/7874
• 2005-09-09 21:05 Re: gcc-4.0-20050908 is now available
• 2005-09-12 21:54 Re: software floating point & machine descriptions
• 2005-09-14 06:05 Re: regmove fixups vs pseudos
• 2005-09-14 16:39 Re: regmove fixups vs pseudos
• 2005-09-14 17:36 Re: CFLAGS in one-tree style cross builds w/ newlib
• 2005-09-14 22:53 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-15 03:28 Re: where is the floatsidf?
• 2005-09-15 04:58 Re: where is the floatsidf?
• 2005-09-15 05:12 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-16 05:42 PR c++/11987: why is it invalid?
• 2005-09-16 20:21 Re: PR c++/11987: why is it invalid?
• 2005-09-16 22:26 Re: PR c++/11987: why is it invalid?
• 2005-09-17 13:17 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-21 19:10 Re: make distclean can not remove intl/config.cache
• 2005-09-22 04:36 Re: [gomp] implement a handfull of easy directives
• 2005-09-22 04:54 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-22 15:19 Re: [gomp] implement a handfull of easy directives
• 2005-09-22 20:21 Re: arguements used in .c.26.flow2 are not used in assembly codes
• 2005-09-25 09:19 PATCH RFC: Increase support for restrict qualifier
• 2005-09-25 09:25 Re: PATCH RFC: Increase support for restrict qualifier
• 2005-09-25 09:36 Re: Compile Without Libc
• 2005-09-25 17:10 Re: PATCH RFC: Increase support for restrict qualifier
• 2005-09-26 20:15 Re: The behaviours of the pointers according to the operating system
• 2005-09-27 03:37 Re: fixed registers in mips
• 2005-09-28 03:16 Re: Some Question abou libstdc++
• 2005-09-28 19:20 Re: Query regarding execute test 960521-1. c in gcc.c-torture
• 2005-09-30 05:06 Re: Windows GUI apps cross-compiled from Linux or Mac OS X?
• 2005-09-30 17:58 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released

Ilya Lipovsky

• 2005-09-23 21:30 Question about the use of builtins in altivec.h

Ingo Krabbe

• 2005-09-14 07:56 Re: help: interfacing between C and fortran program

Ivan Novick

• 2005-09-02 21:45 Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows
• 2005-09-06 18:31 linking on Solaris

Jakub Jelinek

• 2005-09-19 13:07 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 13:33 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?

James A. Morrison

• 2005-09-06 04:57 Re: Question on vrp_meet in tree-vrp.c
• 2005-09-06 07:13 Re: S/390 Bootstrap failure due to fixup_eh_region_note

James E Wilson

• 2005-09-01 21:54 Re: help: about enum
• 2005-09-01 23:16 Re: MASK_GNU_AS == MASK_GAS
• 2005-09-01 23:23 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org is turning away MS Internet Explorer 5
• 2005-09-01 23:34 Re: building gcc 4.0.1 using CAS (part of the sun v8plus arch)

Jan Hubicka

• 2005-09-01 19:04 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use
• 2005-09-23 12:15 Re: Questionable code in fixup_reorder_chain
• 2005-09-30 23:17 Re: x86 SSE constants

Janis Johnson

• 2005-09-01 22:54 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use
• 2005-09-08 16:47 Re: Language Changes in Bug-fix Releases?
• 2005-09-19 23:12 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2

Jeffrey A Law

• 2005-09-07 20:18 Re: Possible bug in tree-vrp.c:vrp_visit_phi_node
• 2005-09-11 14:30 Re: Problem with dom
• 2005-09-11 15:10 Re: Problem with dom

Joe Buck

• 2005-09-01 20:10 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
• 2005-09-09 18:55 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation
• 2005-09-12 17:27 Re: New port contribution - picoChip
• 2005-09-13 05:36 Re: Adding debug symbols causes segmentation faults with GCC-4.1 and MIPS...
• 2005-09-14 18:29 Re: When is it legal to compare any pair of pointers?
• 2005-09-14 22:07 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-15 16:41 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-16 16:41 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-16 17:08 Re: problems in C functions call C++
• 2005-09-16 17:38 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-16 20:18 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-18 23:11 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-23 22:44 Re: c++ default operators
• 2005-09-29 20:08 Re: Computed Values in Preprocessor
• 2005-09-30 18:05 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
• 2005-09-30 18:15 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
• 2005-09-30 18:17 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released

Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp dot com>

• 2005-09-15 16:14 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
• 2005-09-22 17:25 GCC 4.0.2 RC2 RTEMS Report
• 2005-09-30 18:58 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released

Joern RENNECKE

• 2005-09-01 19:52 MEM_NONTRAP_P and push/pop alias set (Was: Re: [attn port maintainers] fix 23671)
• 2005-09-02 12:34 Re: MEM_NONTRAP_P and push/pop alias set (Was: Re: [attn port maintainers] fix 23671)
• 2005-09-05 18:56 Re: RFC ping: Make regname use validate_change
• 2005-09-09 15:59 sh64 support deteriorating
• 2005-09-12 12:20 Re: sh64 support deteriorating
• 2005-09-12 13:36 SH patch applied (Was: Re: sh64 support deteriorating)
• 2005-09-12 14:13 Re: Retested: RFA: fix PR middle-end/23290
• 2005-09-20 20:57 reg_used_between_p vs. CLOBBER
• 2005-09-27 17:47 reload_in<mode> conflicts (Was: Re: [patch RFC] SH: PR target/21623)

John David Anglin

• 2005-09-01 02:37 Re: Successfull gcc-3.4.4 build on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20
• 2005-09-01 13:23 Re: Successfull gcc-3.4.4 build on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20

John Love-Jensen

• 2005-09-22 15:36 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-22 16:28 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-22 16:33 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-23 14:21 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug

Jon Levell

• 2005-09-01 13:55 Selective Mudflap
• 2005-09-02 14:55 Re: Selective Mudflap

Jonathan

• 2005-09-09 17:33 mirror question

Jonathan Day

• 2005-09-07 01:55 Question regarding compiling a toolchain for a Broadcom SB1
• 2005-09-07 09:38 Re: Question regarding compiling a toolchain for a Broadcom SB1
• 2005-09-08 16:22 Re: Question regarding compiling a toolchain for a Broadcom SB1
• 2005-09-08 21:12 Re: Question regarding compiling a toolchain for a Broadcom SB1
• 2005-09-08 22:59 Re: Question regarding compiling a toolchain for a Broadcom SB1

Jonathan Turkanis

• 2005-09-14 15:55 On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-14 23:44 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-16 17:15 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-22 04:09 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-22 04:43 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-23 00:39 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-23 00:40 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-23 01:28 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-23 01:32 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-23 14:57 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-23 15:38 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?

Joseph S. Myers

• 2005-09-14 00:55 gccadmin's crontab
• 2005-09-15 12:59 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-16 12:12 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-16 22:57 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-16 23:09 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-17 14:22 Re: Warning C vs C++

Josh Conner

• 2005-09-03 02:40 [RFH] C++ FE question

Jussi Mononen

• 2005-09-22 12:37 Problems with collect2, linking libgcc twice causing duplicate symbols

Kai Henningsen

• 2005-09-01 15:50 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
• 2005-09-02 15:29 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
• 2005-09-02 15:29 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use
• 2005-09-02 18:59 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
• 2005-09-21 19:38 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-21 19:38 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-24 14:48 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-24 14:48 Re: Warning C vs C++

Kai Ruottu

• 2005-09-07 19:42 Re: Question regarding compiling a toolchain for a Broadcom SB1
• 2005-09-07 20:13 Re: Question regarding compiling a toolchain for a Broadcom SB1

Karel Gardas

• 2005-09-12 20:04 Re: Separating c++ parser

Karene

• 2005-09-01 19:06 Consulting Opportunity - Ph.D. Preferred

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2005-09-24 13:44 Re: System header warning exemptions and delta debugging don't mix well

Kaz Kojima

• 2005-09-10 09:15 Re: sh64 support deteriorating
• 2005-09-15 22:12 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
• 2005-09-19 22:59 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2

Kean Johnston

• 2005-09-30 19:03 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released

Kenneth Zadeck

• 2005-09-23 02:39 Re: [RFC] propagating loop dependences from trees to RTL (for SMS)

Larry Evans

• 2005-09-14 15:54 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible

Laurent GUERBY

• 2005-09-08 20:25 Re: Possible bug in tree-vrp.c:vrp_visit_phi_node
• 2005-09-14 21:47 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
• 2005-09-18 19:24 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
• 2005-09-28 20:28 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)
• 2005-09-29 10:47 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)
• 2005-09-29 21:13 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)
• 2005-09-30 20:29 Ada question about PR 18434

Leehod Baruch

• 2005-09-06 07:42 Question about simplify_rtx ()

Liu Haibin

• 2005-09-07 04:37 some seemingly redundant register uses in nios gcc compiled assembly code
• 2005-09-22 10:45 arguements used in .c.26.flow2 are not used in assembly codes

Marc Espie

• 2005-09-24 10:40 Re: Warning C vs C++

Mark K. Smith

• 2005-09-19 21:00 15 Sept notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call
• 2005-09-20 01:46 RE: 15 Sept notes from GCC improvement for Itanium conference call

Mark Mitchell

• 2005-09-01 23:23 Re: G++ question
• 2005-09-02 22:33 Re: Language Changes in Bug-fix Releases?
• 2005-09-07 07:27 GCC 4.0.2 Status Report
• 2005-09-07 08:17 GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-09-06)
• 2005-09-07 15:21 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status Report
• 2005-09-08 03:39 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status Report
• 2005-09-08 22:56 Performance patches during Stage 3
• 2005-09-08 23:01 Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2005-09-06)
• 2005-09-09 15:40 Re: PATCH RFC: Proposed patch for PR c++/7874
• 2005-09-09 18:31 Re: PATCH RFC: Proposed patch for PR c++/7874
• 2005-09-12 18:22 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation
• 2005-09-12 18:45 Re: uncaught exception in g++ 3.4 and 4.0
• 2005-09-13 15:26 GCC 4.0 branch frozen
• 2005-09-13 16:41 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation
• 2005-09-14 15:13 GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
• 2005-09-15 16:10 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
• 2005-09-15 16:13 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
• 2005-09-16 17:58 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
• 2005-09-16 19:30 Re: PR c++/11987: why is it invalid?
• 2005-09-16 20:28 Re: PR c++/11987: why is it invalid?
• 2005-09-16 22:37 Re: PR c++/11987: why is it invalid?
• 2005-09-17 22:00 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
• 2005-09-18 16:42 GCC 4.0.2 RC2
• 2005-09-20 03:19 Re: constructors and multiple entry points
• 2005-09-20 04:06 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
• 2005-09-20 16:40 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-21 02:53 Final GCC 4.0.2 Code Freeze
• 2005-09-21 13:51 GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993
• 2005-09-21 23:12 Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993
• 2005-09-22 16:11 GCC 4.0.2 RC3
• 2005-09-23 16:43 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3
• 2005-09-23 16:45 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3
• 2005-09-23 18:37 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC3
• 2005-09-27 14:58 GCC 4.0.2 Status
• 2005-09-27 17:56 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status
• 2005-09-29 04:05 GCC 4.0.2 Released
• 2005-09-29 04:09 GCC 4.0 branch open
• 2005-09-29 13:17 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)
• 2005-09-30 07:52 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
• 2005-09-30 17:06 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
• 2005-09-30 17:54 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
• 2005-09-30 21:24 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
• 2005-09-30 23:46 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released

Martin Reinecke

• 2005-09-26 13:35 Gomp and C++?

Matthias Klose

• 2005-09-30 18:17 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released

mcrosier

• 2005-09-20 17:50 Build DDG from multiple BBs

Meissner, Michael

• 2005-09-06 18:14 RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-07 17:12 RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-09 01:20 RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-09 17:47 RE: var_args for rs6000 backend

Michael Cieslinski

• 2005-09-20 13:46 How set an iterator to NULL

Michael Tegtmeyer

• 2005-09-06 19:04 existing functionality questions
• 2005-09-07 15:59 Re: existing functionality questions
• 2005-09-07 17:25 Re: existing functionality questions
• 2005-09-07 19:19 Re: existing functionality questions

Michael Trimarchi

• 2005-09-09 15:17 smart memcpy

Michael Veksler

• 2005-09-06 06:17 Re: Question on vrp_meet in tree-vrp.c
• 2005-09-06 06:25 Re: A questions about NaN and Infinity in GCC
• 2005-09-24 16:48 Re: A peculiar problem

Mike Stump

• 2005-09-07 00:48 Re: Language Changes in Bug-fix Releases?
• 2005-09-07 01:10 Re: existing functionality questions
• 2005-09-07 01:41 Re: Extending functionality of -frepo
• 2005-09-07 02:23 Re: Language Changes in Bug-fix Releases?
• 2005-09-07 18:47 Re: existing functionality questions
• 2005-09-07 19:41 Re: Extending functionality of -frepo
• 2005-09-07 21:23 Re: existing functionality questions
• 2005-09-08 17:09 Re: Language Changes in Bug-fix Releases?
• 2005-09-09 00:56 Re: Should Objective-C++ be mentioned in the 4.1 changes.
• 2005-09-12 19:07 Re: New port contribution - picoChip
• 2005-09-13 19:27 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible
• 2005-09-14 22:46 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-15 00:32 checksum files not ^C safe
• 2005-09-15 16:53 Re: checksum files not ^C safe
• 2005-09-16 19:24 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-17 17:12 Re: pointer checking run time code
• 2005-09-17 17:18 Re: pointer checking run time code
• 2005-09-19 19:06 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-19 19:23 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
• 2005-09-20 17:36 Re: installing problem
• 2005-09-20 18:20 Re: Array to Double.
• 2005-09-22 22:41 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-23 01:07 Re: On which platforms is -fvisibility supported?
• 2005-09-23 21:02 Re: gcc-4.0.2: supporting -fvisibility for solaris ld
• 2005-09-26 03:40 Re: g++.dg not having one .exp per directory
• 2005-09-26 18:03 Re: g++.dg not having one .exp per directory
• 2005-09-27 01:07 Re: DERIVED_FROM_P

mksmith

• 2005-09-07 21:49 Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation

N V Krishna

• 2005-09-20 06:03 Array to Double.
• 2005-09-20 20:31 Re: Array to Double.

Nadezhda Ivanоvna Vyukova

• 2005-09-09 11:41 mips targets: seq_df, seq_sf

Neil Booth

• 2005-09-14 23:22 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-22 15:32 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug

Nicholas Nethercote

• 2005-09-13 22:04 Re: Adding debug symbols causes segmentation faults with GCC-4.1and MIPS...

Nick Clifton

• 2005-09-30 11:07 Re: Any plan to support Windows/x86-64?

Nix

• 2005-09-12 19:27 Re: New port contribution - picoChip

Noe Aljaz ITICMN

• 2005-09-05 07:09 Extending functionality of -frepo
• 2005-09-07 07:37 RE: Extending functionality of -frepo
• 2005-09-08 12:47 RE: Extending functionality of -frepo

Olivier Hainque

• 2005-09-08 15:45 Support for the MPC5554 in gcc ?
• 2005-09-09 12:30 zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
• 2005-09-09 13:25 Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
• 2005-09-09 13:55 Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
• 2005-09-09 14:27 Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
• 2005-09-09 14:51 Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
• 2005-09-09 21:33 Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
• 2005-09-12 07:24 Re: Support for the MPC5554 in gcc ?
• 2005-09-12 12:53 Re: zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
• 2005-09-30 09:25 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?
• 2005-09-30 13:55 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?
• 2005-09-30 14:30 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?
• 2005-09-30 14:58 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?

Paolo Bonzini

• 2005-09-01 07:25 Re: Regarding bug 22480, vectorisation of shifts
• 2005-09-06 08:03 Re: Question about simplify_rtx ()
• 2005-09-07 11:42 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status Report
• 2005-09-19 12:13 Re: Gcc 4.1 has been failing SPEC CPU 2000 on 64bit platforms
• 2005-09-19 12:31 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
• 2005-09-19 13:01 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
• 2005-09-20 07:41 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency
• 2005-09-21 08:51 Re: Problem with gcc 4.0.1
• 2005-09-22 08:29 Re: [RFC] propagating loop dependences from trees to RTL (for SMS)
• 2005-09-25 11:13 g++.dg not having one .exp per directory
• 2005-09-26 07:08 Re: g++.dg not having one .exp per directory
• 2005-09-26 08:38 Re: fwprop patch testing

Paolo Carlini

• 2005-09-02 16:56 23667: Recent performance regression
• 2005-09-13 10:45 Re: When is it legal to compare any pair of pointers?
• 2005-09-13 10:57 Re: When is it legal to compare any pair of pointers?
• 2005-09-21 15:47 Re: GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993

patriciak784-gccmainling

• 2005-09-20 11:14 Calling functions on x86

Paul Brook

• 2005-09-06 14:06 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 14:30 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-09 01:56 Re: a question about floating point register
• 2005-09-15 13:25 Re: lib2funcs and fpbit both rely on each other
• 2005-09-16 17:06 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
• 2005-09-19 19:38 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
• 2005-09-22 19:03 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-24 22:52 Re: Insn for direct increment of memory?
• 2005-09-24 23:20 Re: Insn for direct increment of memory?

Paul Eggert

• 2005-09-14 20:51 proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-16 21:26 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)

Paul Koning

• 2005-09-07 13:43 Re: Question regarding compiling a toolchain for a Broadcom SB1
• 2005-09-07 13:46 Re: Language Changes in Bug-fix Releases?
• 2005-09-19 14:27 Re: Mapping range of addresses

Paul Schlie

• 2005-09-04 21:02 Re: insv vs one-bit fields
• 2005-09-05 03:03 Re: insv vs one-bit fields
• 2005-09-05 03:28 Re: insv vs one-bit fields

Per Abrahamsen

• 2005-09-19 09:38 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-19 13:22 Re: Warning C vs C++

Per Bothner

• 2005-09-07 17:50 Re: Status of --enable-mapped-location
• 2005-09-14 23:08 Tom Tromey as Java maintainer

Perret Yannick

• 2005-09-14 10:41 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible

Peter Barada

• 2005-09-11 03:40 Re: Minimum/maximum operators are deprecated?

Peter O'Gorman

• 2005-09-01 03:16 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
• 2005-09-01 05:09 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
• 2005-09-01 16:07 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
• 2005-09-01 23:37 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
• 2005-09-04 07:54 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
• 2005-09-29 04:30 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?

Peter S. Mazinger

• 2005-09-05 15:36 libssp missing from CVS
• 2005-09-05 15:49 Re: libssp missing from CVS

Peter Steinmetz

• 2005-09-20 19:05 Question on syntax in machine description files.
• 2005-09-30 16:04 Question on bad counters.
• 2005-09-30 16:30 Re: Question about updating CFG block counters in purge_dead_edges [was "Questionon bad counters."]

Rafael Ávila de Espíndola

• 2005-09-11 21:50 dead code in treelang/parse.y
• 2005-09-17 14:43 Re: [PATCH] fix warnings in treelang/parse.y

Rafael Ãvila de EspÃndola

• 2005-09-14 00:17 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible
• 2005-09-17 04:07 [PATCH] fix warnings in treelang/parse.y

Rainer Emrich

• 2005-09-02 08:03 Successfull build of gcc-3.3.6 on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.0
• 2005-09-02 08:20 Successfull build of gcc-3.3.6 on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2005-09-04 16:31 Successfull build of gcc-3.4.4 on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00
• 2005-09-04 16:33 Successfull build of gcc-3.4.4 on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2005-09-06 07:28 Successfull build of gcc-4.0.1 on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00
• 2005-09-06 07:30 Successfull build of gcc-4.0.1 on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2005-09-07 15:41 unexpected link behaviour g++-4.0.1 on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00
• 2005-09-12 09:34 failed to build libgfortran gcc-4.0.1 on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2005-09-28 09:02 regression for ada on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2005-09-28 11:14 Re: regression for ada on mips-sgi-irix6.5

Rainer Orth

• 2005-09-21 17:26 Re: failed to build libgfortran gcc-4.0.1 on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2005-09-28 10:25 Re: regression for ada on mips-sgi-irix6.5
• 2005-09-28 11:50 Re: regression for ada on mips-sgi-irix6.5

Rajkishore Barik

• 2005-09-13 06:19 Loop information

Ralf Corsepius

• 2005-09-14 13:10 CFLAGS in one-tree style cross builds w/ newlib

Ralf Wildenhues

• 2005-09-01 11:52 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?

Ranjit Mathew

• 2005-09-21 14:13 Re: Segmentation Fault building GCC for i686-pc-mingw32
• 2005-09-30 06:13 Re: Windows GUI apps cross-compiled from Linux or Mac OS X?

Richard B. Kreckel

• 2005-09-02 21:30 Language Changes in Bug-fix Releases?
• 2005-09-07 19:55 Re: Language Changes in Bug-fix Releases?

Richard Guenther

• 2005-09-06 08:29 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 08:45 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 12:54 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-14 19:53 Re: Symbolic replacement
• 2005-09-19 13:32 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
• 2005-09-26 09:48 Re: PATCH RFC: Increase support for restrict qualifier
• 2005-09-29 14:39 libjawtgnu linking borked

Richard Henderson

• 2005-09-01 17:26 Re: Regarding bug 22480, vectorisation of shifts
• 2005-09-01 17:50 Re: Incorrect use of anti-dependency to order instructions in the DFA scheduler
• 2005-09-01 21:18 Re: MEM_NONTRAP_P and push/pop alias set (Was: Re: [attn port maintainers] fix 23671)
• 2005-09-04 17:47 Re: insv vs one-bit fields
• 2005-09-05 22:39 Re: S/390 Bootstrap failure due to fixup_eh_region_note
• 2005-09-06 16:44 Re: S/390 Bootstrap failure due to fixup_eh_region_note
• 2005-09-06 17:02 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 18:33 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 19:02 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 19:29 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 19:43 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-09 23:47 Re: uncaught exception in g++ 3.4 and 4.0
• 2005-09-10 00:03 Re: [PowerPC] PR23774 stack backchain broken saga
• 2005-09-10 00:05 Re: sh64 support deteriorating
• 2005-09-10 06:39 Re: [PowerPC] PR23774 stack backchain broken saga
• 2005-09-15 18:21 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency
• 2005-09-16 02:40 Re: Can we have a symbol_ref node of a declared symbol without having its flags set?
• 2005-09-18 19:59 data dependence for pointers broken?
• 2005-09-19 09:18 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 09:20 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 10:26 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-20 00:30 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency
• 2005-09-20 04:18 Re: RFA: pervasive SSE codegen inefficiency
• 2005-09-23 19:41 Re: [RFC] patch to fix an ICE involving sign-extract of mmx expression
• 2005-09-29 16:36 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)
• 2005-09-30 01:30 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?
• 2005-09-30 19:47 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?

Richard Kenner

• 2005-09-05 21:23 Question on vrp_meet in tree-vrp.c
• 2005-09-05 21:24 Question on vrp_meet in tree-vrp.c
• 2005-09-05 21:35 Possible bug in tree-vrp.c:vrp_visit_phi_node
• 2005-09-05 21:53 More on vrp_meet
• 2005-09-06 02:10 DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 12:01 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 12:06 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 12:48 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 13:23 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 13:34 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 13:38 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 13:47 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 14:13 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 17:42 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 18:37 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 19:04 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 19:34 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 20:11 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-08 14:45 Re: Possible bug in tree-vrp.c:vrp_visit_phi_node
• 2005-09-29 11:29 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)
• 2005-09-29 21:17 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Status (Ada)
• 2005-09-30 01:40 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?
• 2005-09-30 15:18 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?
• 2005-09-30 16:42 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?
• 2005-09-30 17:09 Re: Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?
• 2005-09-30 23:05 Confusion with tree_ssa_useless_type_conversion_1

Richard Sandiford

• 2005-09-07 08:42 Re: Question regarding compiling a toolchain for a Broadcom SB1
• 2005-09-17 09:52 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
• 2005-09-28 12:38 Possible bug in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:prepare_decl_rtl?

Robert Dewar

• 2005-09-14 08:54 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation
• 2005-09-14 10:18 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible
• 2005-09-14 16:25 Re: coding style: type* variable or type *varible
• 2005-09-14 16:27 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation
• 2005-09-14 22:25 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-15 02:31 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-15 11:24 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-15 20:21 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-17 13:58 Re: pointer checking run time code
• 2005-09-17 15:45 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-17 15:55 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-17 15:59 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-17 16:10 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-19 12:37 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-19 14:25 Re: Mapping range of addresses
• 2005-09-19 14:32 Re: pointer checking run time code
• 2005-09-21 14:55 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug
• 2005-09-22 16:51 Re: No effect of -fshort-enums..is it a bug

Ross Ridge

• 2005-09-13 16:26 Re: Any plan to support Windows/x86-64?
• 2005-09-14 22:21 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-14 22:40 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-14 23:56 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-15 04:51 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-15 07:17 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-15 17:43 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-16 15:38 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-16 20:58 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-21 02:05 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-23 01:09 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)

Rupert Wood

• 2005-09-10 00:35 RE: gcc-4.0-20050908 is now available

Saurabh Verma

• 2005-09-28 16:14 Query regarding execute test 960521-1. c in gcc.c-torture

sean yang

• 2005-09-09 17:28 question about linker
• 2005-09-10 10:50 interprocedural CFG

Sebastian Pop

• 2005-09-06 09:17 Re: Question on vrp_meet in tree-vrp.c
• 2005-09-19 09:09 Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 10:02 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?
• 2005-09-19 11:17 Re: Undefined behavior in genautomata.c?

Segher Boessenkool

• 2005-09-13 10:01 Re: [PowerPC] PR23774 stack backchain broken saga
• 2005-09-13 12:14 Re: [PowerPC] PR23774 stack backchain broken saga

sek_saf_on (sent by Nabble.com)

• 2005-09-26 20:03 The behaviours of the pointers according to the operating system

Shantonu Sen

• 2005-09-01 15:30 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
• 2005-09-01 21:23 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?

Shaun Jackman

• 2005-09-29 15:59 ICE in first_insn_after_basic_block_note

Shin-Ming Liu

• 2005-09-15 01:11 Re: [gelato-gcc] Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itaniumvia Gelato Federation

shreyas krishnan

• 2005-09-11 15:09 rtl line no
• 2005-09-13 20:49 Re: rtl line no
• 2005-09-14 16:06 Symbolic replacement
• 2005-09-17 13:41 pointer checking run time code
• 2005-09-19 14:14 Mapping range of addresses
• 2005-09-19 14:34 Re: Mapping range of addresses

Stargrave

• 2005-09-22 13:34 Succesfull build on i386-unknown-freebsd5.3

Steve Ellcey

• 2005-09-21 17:20 Request for testsuite help (gcc.dg/compat)

Steve Kargl

• 2005-09-30 22:30 Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers

Steven Bosscher

• 2005-09-01 21:45 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use
• 2005-09-01 23:13 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use
• 2005-09-05 15:49 Re: libssp missing from CVS
• 2005-09-05 21:33 Re: Question on vrp_meet in tree-vrp.c
• 2005-09-06 12:17 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 12:21 Store-copyprop not very bright
• 2005-09-06 13:16 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-06 13:39 Re: DCE eliminating valid statement for ACATS c34007p
• 2005-09-08 12:40 Slowness in the ssa operands cache
• 2005-09-10 12:08 Re: Minimum/maximum operators are deprecated?
• 2005-09-12 17:01 Re: New port contribution - picoChip
• 2005-09-14 09:05 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation
• 2005-09-16 07:12 Re: Where are the fortran test results for cv strunk?
• 2005-09-22 09:33 Re: [RFC] propagating loop dependences from trees to RTL (for SMS)
• 2005-09-30 21:01 Re: [PATCH, ping] Cray Pointers

Steven J. Hill

• 2005-09-13 02:18 Adding debug symbols causes segmentation faults with GCC-4.1 andMIPS...
• 2005-09-13 03:31 Re: Adding debug symbols causes segmentation faults with GCC-4.1and MIPS...
• 2005-09-13 21:37 Re: Adding debug symbols causes segmentation faults with GCC-4.1and MIPS...
• 2005-09-13 21:40 Re: Adding debug symbols causes segmentation faults with GCC-4.1and MIPS...

Thad

• 2005-09-10 04:29 real nice teens beautys ;)

Tian Dale-A19565

• 2005-09-16 17:01 problems in C functions call C++

TJ Laurenzo

• 2005-09-20 21:59 Segmentation Fault building GCC for i686-pc-mingw32
• 2005-09-21 21:00 Re: Segmentation Fault building GCC for i686-pc-mingw32

Tom Tromey

• 2005-09-02 17:09 Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
• 2005-09-21 19:36 warning about classpath import
• 2005-09-22 14:30 Re: warning about classpath import
• 2005-09-22 14:44 Re: warning about classpath import
• 2005-09-22 17:46 Re: warning about classpath import
• 2005-09-22 17:46 Re: warning about classpath import
• 2005-09-23 19:26 Re: warning about classpath import

Tommy Vercetti

• 2005-09-16 19:55 Re: problems in C functions call C++
• 2005-09-17 13:59 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-17 14:54 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-17 15:57 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-17 16:01 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-19 16:35 Re: Warning C vs C++
• 2005-09-23 17:09 c++ default operators

Tony Wieczorek via RT

• 2005-09-28 19:33 [gnu.org #252800]

Toon Moene

• 2005-09-21 19:02 moene.indiv.nluug.nl is back in business (black and white only, though).

Ulrich Weigand

• 2005-09-14 21:17 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
• 2005-09-18 21:44 Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC2
• 2005-09-29 16:32 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released
• 2005-09-30 00:21 Aliasing violation generated by fold_builtin_memcmp?
• 2005-09-30 13:17 Re: GCC 4.0.2 Released

Uros Bizjak

• 2005-09-02 10:33 Re: Regarding bug 22480, vectorisation of shifts

Vassili Karpov

• 2005-09-17 12:13 Warning C vs C++

Vladimir Makarov

• 2005-09-14 13:51 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation

Vladimir N. Makarov

• 2005-09-09 14:45 Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation

Vladimir Yanovsky

• 2005-09-21 16:43 [RFC] propagating loop dependences from trees to RTL (for SMS)

Wen-mei W. Hwu

• 2005-09-14 15:31 Re: [gelato-gcc] Re: Introduction of GCC improvement work for Itanium via Gelato Federation

Yao qi

• 2005-09-06 02:56 var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-06 05:53 A questions about NaN and Infinity in GCC
• 2005-09-09 01:10 RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-09 02:25 Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-09 05:47 Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-09 06:01 Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-09 07:09 Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-09 10:43 RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-09 10:57 Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-14 11:46 RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-20 06:43 Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-21 05:24 make distclean can not remove intl/config.cache
• 2005-09-22 06:06 Re: make distclean can not remove intl/config.cache

Yao Qi qi

• 2005-09-07 03:14 RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
• 2005-09-07 11:11 Re: var_args for rs6000 backend

Zack Weinberg

• 2005-09-16 19:42 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-17 22:10 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-17 23:20 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-18 16:52 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
• 2005-09-20 00:02 Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)

Zdenek Dvorak

• 2005-09-02 09:01 Re: -fprofile-generate and -fprofile-use
• 2005-09-11 08:36 Problem with dom
• 2005-09-11 14:40 Re: Problem with dom
• 2005-09-13 12:43 Must mode of set and REG_EQUIV note match?
• 2005-09-14 08:06 Re: Loop information
• 2005-09-22 09:25 Re: [RFC] propagating loop dependences from trees to RTL (for SMS)
• 2005-09-28 14:31 Re: Possible bug in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:prepare_decl_rtl?

Zhan Zhaohua

• 2005-09-28 02:10 Some Question abou libstdc++

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)