This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: insv vs one-bit fields
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- To: schlie at comcast dot net
- Cc: rth at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 23:11:23 -0400
- Subject: Re: insv vs one-bit fields
- References: <BF412DB2.B63F%schlie@comcast.net>
> - so then any valid width bit-field should be considered a
> correspondingly valid const and/or volatile bit-field, which may
> potentially be more efficiently accessed as a function of a target's
> specific ISA?
The "insv" pattern *already* does this. It just doesn't support the
one-bit-bitfield case.