This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 02 Sep 2005 11:05:04 -0600
- Subject: Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0508311718400.22973@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at><m3wtm2kmsh.fsf@gossamer.airs.com><0b7e9f70d997eb3033872da5db37f4c8@physics.uc.edu>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:
>> So I think the best way to address this is to not run ranlib.
Andrew> If you consider Darwin "modern", then that statement is not correct
Andrew> as moving/copying an archive on darwin, requires ranlib to be run.
Can't we install the .a without changing its timestamp?
E.g., 'install -p'.
Tom