This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
- From: Peter O'Gorman <peter at pogma dot com>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 08:37:16 +0900
- Subject: Re: Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0508311718400.22973@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <m3wtm2kmsh.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <0b7e9f70d997eb3033872da5db37f4c8@physics.uc.edu> <m3slwplxoq.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <m3k6i1lxd2.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0508312203410.22973@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <43167287.4080907@pogma.com> <20050901201042.GC10948@synopsys.com> <a1ac7d5f8b133b94d4b6d7c0f5f3b358@physics.uc.edu>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Pinski wrote:
|> Won't you then get warning messages on Darwin every time someone tries
|> to use the installed library (since the symbol table timestamp will be
|> older than the file timestamp)?
|
|
| It will not be a warning on darwin, it will be straight error as
| Darwin's linker does not like the timestamp to be out of date at
| all.
Doesn't matter, the solution I applied to GNU libtool cvs last night is
probably most appropriate, i.e. chmod 644 before ranlib. I guess I'll look
at gcc cvs over the weekend to figure out where that would go in your tree.
Peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBQxeQrLiDAg3OZTLPAQIZjQP9H3NKZd2r/AMNrqG+0pJ4WEdBgo8J/WUC
JZMY0l3JElo81UugL/2T5OOJvESmO6N5iiZj4blACg3m3cgPIuuFZ+K+UmV6rQW0
ypOauMYu6Un5SLlGV3KHm5qdLYqPPzyOLJfjCDvnNGcdBst0SG/jkfgiSAqq8hDt
c6YrkYmCWq0=
=dRag
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----