This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: apply_result_size vs FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 16:48 +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > That was my thoughts too. You could take a look at how I fixed it on
> > ARM.
>
> Thanks. So basically you bypass the apply_result_mode array entirely, which
> is still wrong as it is on SPARC?
>
Personally, I think that builtin_apply_args should go away, but what are
your thoughts on the rest of the thread. Richard didn't respond to my
last mail in the thread here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-03/msg02184.html
>From my re-reading (it's been over a year here), I think the
FUNCTION_VALUE_REGNO_P "suggestion" is wrong as it's lying to the rest
of the compiler. At any rate, what entry are you getting for sparc? How
is the comment in regclass.c for reg_raw_mode's initialization not
working?
-eric