This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs

From: James E Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>
To: Dylan Cuthbert <dylan at q-games dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:09:40 -0800
Subject: Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
References: <cv7gku$5qu$1@sea.gmane.org> <421A9956.5040704@specifixinc.com> <cvfjaf$uhv$1@sea.gmane.org> <421B81FD.7070709@specifixinc.com> <cvg1i2$l7k$1@sea.gmane.org>

Dylan Cuthbert wrote:

For the last parameter (equiv) of emit_no_conflict_block I am putting in "gen_rtx_SET ( V16SFmode, op0, op1 )", does this seem correct to you?

This is supposed to be the value of op0 after the no conflict block. So it should just be op1. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
  - From: Dylan Cuthbert

References:
- moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
  - From: Dylan Cuthbert
- Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
  - From: James E Wilson
- Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
  - From: Dylan Cuthbert
- Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
  - From: James E Wilson
- Re: moving v16sf reg with multiple sub-regs
  - From: Dylan Cuthbert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]