Re: C++ broken again wrt. GTY desc

[Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>]

Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Monday 19 July 2004 19:50, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>
> > Steven Bosscher wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > You _can_ _not_ have a switch from GTY desc if the switch has
> > > three possibilities while the index expression can only be 0
> > > or 1!
> >
> > yes, and that doesn't matter in this case. The code is correct, if
> > strange.
>
>
> Definitely strange ;-)
>
>
> > If you are getting additional warnings about unreachable code, then
> > there needs to be some other way to say that or something.
>
>
> Yes, well, hmm ;-)
> Can we in the mean time just merge those two fields like with the
> quck'n'dirty patch I just posted?  I need this to move out that
sure, it's either that or some new GTY thingy.  Whatever works for you.

nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk