This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 25% memory requirement regression since yesterday

From: Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:45:49 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: 25% memory requirement regression since yesterday
References: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0407121011190.2199@bellatrix.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de><40F29F0D.3070101@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0407121625550.2199@bellatrix.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de><40F2D993.5090000@codesourcery.com>

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Mark Mitchell wrote:

> Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> After hacking up your maxmem.sh script to work on my Red Hat 8 system
> (you must check both old_mmap and mmap2, FYI), I get the same results: a
> 5MB reduction with my patch.
>
> I don't intend to look further at this issue until/unless you get
> confirmation that it was indeed my patch that caused the problem.

Ok, it seemed to have been "noise", today memory usage is slightly below
the day before yesterday.  Also compile time dropped again.  Sorry for the
false alarm.

Thanks,
Richard.

--
Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at uni-tuebingen dot de>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/

References:
- 25% memory requirement regression since yesterday
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: 25% memory requirement regression since yesterday
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: 25% memory requirement regression since yesterday
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: 25% memory requirement regression since yesterday
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]