This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Deprecate g++ overloading extension?
On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 10:32:09 -0700, Mark Mitchell <email@example.com> wrote:
>>I'm opposed to removing it. We already give an unconditional pedwarn which
>>tells the user what's wrong with their code.
> If we pick a built-in candidate, we don't warn -- because we never go
> through the call machinery which is where the warning would be generated.
Hmm, that's odd.
> That's why this came up; I talked to someone who was confused by the fact
> that G++ did not match another compiler's behavior.
> Will you agree to implement a fix for the case where we pick a built-in
OK. File a bug report?