This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- To: rth at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 04 20:53:27 EDT
- Subject: Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE
Perhaps you're ignoring the 3600 lines of tree-level folding
in builtins.c? We do QUITE A LOT of reasoning with builtins,
thank you very much.
OK, but that doesn't change the fact that it's still easier to
do things before such a transformation occurs.
> If we go down the direction you suggest, we're making things much *worse*
> than it used to be, not better.
I'm about done with the attacks here.
Excuse me? What am I *attacking*? I'm just trying to argue in favor
of one approach over another.