This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

stmt.c:expand_stack_alloc


There's a comment in there saying that in function-at-a-time mode,
variable_size doesn't expand something.  But isn't that comment
irrelevant now that tree-ssa has been merged?  Wouldn't that
expand_expr call be wrong?

And if it's right, then why isn't it being called for TYPE_MIN_VALUE
as well?  You can have a variable-sized object because either of the
values is non-constant.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]