This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc-ss-3.3-20040519 is now available
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Kelley Cook <kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 15:44:23 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: gcc-ss-3.3-20040519 is now available
- References: <20040519231126.16570.qmail@sourceware.org> <40ACB805.8080201@gcc.gnu.org>
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Kelley Cook wrote:
> Of course, it is also possible that the filesystem is setup to do some
> fancy footwork behind the scenes and actually uses the script that is
> current for the version of GCC as my update was not checked into GCC
> 3.3.x (Gaby, should it be?).
All snapshots are generated from a single version of that script, which
usually is the most current version off mainline.
> BTW, I'm not sure that you would want this level of automation, but it
> would not be very hard for me to craft a few script lines to verify that
> it as well as the other scripts (i.e. update_web_doc) running on
> gcc.gnu.org match CVS HEAD and automagically update them otherwise.
Personally, I wouldn't (and I had actually planned to update the script in
the gccadmin account manually before seeing your e-mail), but if Joseph is
in favor of performing such an update automatically, I won't object too
strongly.
(Sometimes the version on gcc.gnu.org is modified, because in addition
to the regular tests I perform, I usually wait for a regular snapshot to
success before committing an update, so having an automatic updated could
cause CVS conflicts and thus break snapshots.)
Gerald
--
Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) gerald@pfeifer.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/