This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball?

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 12:46:55 +0200
Subject: Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball?
References: <40ACC3BF.4080109@suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405201536290.8488@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <40ACD545.8020200@suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405201739440.9495@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <40AD1CCE.2060505@suse.de> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0405211229010.85632@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

Yes, if you also add a nice ChangeLog entry, I would. :-)

It's pre-approved for mainline and the 3.4 branch. Please Cc: Gaby when sending the patch with ChangeLog to gcc-patches; he might want it as well.

Thanks Gerald, I will do what you are suggesting.

Paolo.

References:
- What about providing changes.html in the tarball?
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball?
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball?
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball?
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball?
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball?
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]