Re: RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement (Was: Beginner GCC projects question)

[Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>]

On May 18, 2004, at 16:44, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:

> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
> > See, the solution to the crossbuild problem (and to the "non-GCC
> > bootstrap compiler" problem) is to build cpplib for the build machine,
> > and wrap a custom tool around it.  That part is easy.  But once
> > you've done that, why not make the custom tool a little cleverer so
> > that it can generate _all_ the dependencies?  I don't think it's
> > hard.
>
> Has anybody considered dropping the requirement of
> being able to bootstrap from any C89 compiler?

We just changed from any C compiler to C89 compiler, I would say no.
Now a C99 compiler is a different issue but we should wait until we
implement every part of C99 to get rid of the C89 dependent.

Andrew Pinski