This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce

From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 12:19:38 -0700
Subject: Re: PATCH: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce
References: <20040504054619.GA5965@lucon.org><4075E063-9DFC-11D8-B137-003065A77310@apple.com><20040505182649.GA8969@lucon.org><874qquwwf6.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com><20040505185302.GA9477@lucon.org>

"H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:

>> Uh, surely there is a better way to do this than a long chain of
>> strcmp() operations on the linkonce section name?
>> 
>
> I want to keep my change to minimal and support existing source code.

Support existing source code, fine.  Minimal, no, not necessary; this
is stage 1 development.

Unfortunately I don't know this part of GCC well enough to offer
constructive advice.

zw

References:
- Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce?
  - From: Mike Stump
- PATCH: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: PATCH: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]