This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison

From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>,Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>,"gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 21:43:08 +0200
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison
Organization: SUSE Labs
References: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0405041140270.15724@bellatrix.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> <409931D3.9070401@codesourcery.com> <40993D6C.5030603@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>

On Wednesday 05 May 2004 21:15, Richard Guenther wrote:
> That would be a 30% regression for -fsyntax-only.  Ugh.  Can anyone
> confirm this?  Also, why do we gimplify and symout for -fsyntax-only?

We do a lot more than just gimplifying at -fsyntax-only, see passes.c.
This can be fixed post-merge.

Gr.
Steven

References:
- [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]