This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 01:05:32 +0100
Subject: Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
References: <200403091809.i29I9P04020607@sirius.codesourcery.com> <200403190031.22113.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <20040318233552.GI31589@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

> Can't we at least detect the case where either the whole aggregate
> is const or all its fields are const?  Then we don't need any blockage.

So we endorse the double /u liberality?

-- 
Eric Botcazou

References:
- GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]