This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- Cc: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>, Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>,GCC List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 15:43:06 -0800
- Subject: Re: IMA vs tree-ssa
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <F0209661-68A9-11D8-8C0E-000A95D7CD40@apple.com> <20040226230842.GA28463@redhat.com> <jmwu698lfu.fsf@desire.geoffk.org> <20040227211712.GB16448@daikokuya.co.uk> <jmoerk8ae8.fsf@desire.geoffk.org> <20040227220212.GC16448@daikokuya.co.uk> <404CF3C5.4070803@codesourcery.com> <m3n06rlzgj.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
I suspect your C++ brackground is showing up :-)
I believe Neil is right. See
[standard clipped]
Thanks for forwarding that, but, as it happens, I'd read it before I
replied.
I'm not so much questioning what it actually says as I am questioning
what it meant to say.
In other words, I'm saying I think that this non-transitivity is a defect in the standard, rather than an intentional thing.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com