This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>, Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 08:11:19 -0500
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
- Organization: Red Hat Canada
- References: <200402251025.i1PAPHI20097@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 05:25, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> I'm happy to help out with testing, but I don't have enough bandwidth to
> do much more than fix trivial issues that are ARM-specific.
>
That's plenty. Thanks. If there's anything else odd you notice, could
you file a PR?
> The ARM compiler doesn't build at all -- RTH's change to nested function
> support has left arm.c uncompilable -- the changes are (I think) pretty
> trivial, but there are so many other problems at this time that I can't
> even test what I think is the right change. That patch broke *at least*
> two back ends.
>
I believe these are similar to the H8 breakage that Kazu fixed
yesterday. Is this what you're referring to?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-02/msg02311.html
> The fortran compiler doesn't run on the systems I have -- see the GMP
> thread above.
>
OK. We'll have to figure out what to do with GMP. I also believe that
pulling it in GCC's tree may be the better solution. Toon? Paul?
> The build system tries to build libmudflap with pthread calls. An arm-elf
> target is never going to support pthreads (it's for bare-metal systems).
> Consequently it's impossible to build the libjava or objc libraries.
>
Could you file a PR for this, if one doesn't exist yet?
Thanks. Diego.