This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>, Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:39:47 -0700
- Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <1077714679.16194.189.camel@localhost.localdomain>, Diego Novillo wr
ites:
>> The ARM compiler doesn't build at all -- RTH's change to nested function
>> support has left arm.c uncompilable -- the changes are (I think) pretty
>> trivial, but there are so many other problems at this time that I can't
>> even test what I think is the right change. That patch broke *at least*
>> two back ends.
>>
>I believe these are similar to the H8 breakage that Kazu fixed
>yesterday. Is this what you're referring to?
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-02/msg02311.html
>
>> The fortran compiler doesn't run on the systems I have -- see the GMP
>> thread above.
>>
>OK. We'll have to figure out what to do with GMP. I also believe that
>pulling it in GCC's tree may be the better solution. Toon? Paul?
I'm not sure if it's really that advisable to pull in GMP. Rather I
think that having g95 self-disable if a suitable GMP is not found is
a cleaner solution for now.
jeff