This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcj segmentation fault
- From: "Giovanni Visciano" <giovannivisciano at virgilio dot it>
- To: tromey at redhat dot com
- Cc: "Andrew Haley" <aph at redhat dot com>,"Andrew Pinski" <apinski at apple dot com>,gcc at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:30:40 +0200
- Subject: Re: gcj segmentation fault
>-- Messaggio originale --
>From: Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com>
>Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 19:46:59 +0100
>To: Jeff Sturm <jsturm@one-point.com>
>Cc: Andrew Pinski <apinski@apple.com>,
> Giovanni Visciano <giovannivisciano@virgilio.it>, <tromey@redhat.com>,
> <gcc@sources.redhat.com>
>Subject: Re: gcj segmentation fault
>
>
>
>Jeff Sturm writes:
> > On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > > > my binutils:
> > > > binutils 2.12.90.0.1-4
> > >
> > > From <http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#ix86-*-linux*>:
> > > As of GCC 3.3, binutils 2.13.1 or later is required for this platform.
> > > See bug 10877 for more information.
> >
> > The backtrace doesn't look right for 10877, which is related to
> > relocations, not EH.
>
>Yeah, but one truly evil binutils bug *is* related to EH.
>
>http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-02/msg00352.html
>http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-02/msg00471.html
>
>Andrew.
with binutils 2.13.90, it works
thanks Giovanni