This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa?
- From: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch dot com>
- To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- Cc: gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:03:39 -0400
- Subject: Re: Compiler Analysis: 3.3, 3.4, or tree-ssa?
- References: <3F8D50D5.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
3.4 is soon in feature freeze, so it's too late for major changes.
Should I also analyze tree-ssa, aka 3.5? Is there value in
comparing results from 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5?
Yes since I see: - 3.3 as baseline and as platform that is stable -
3.4 to test what progress has been made already and - 3.5 as the tree
that will hopefully ;-) have fixed everything
Sounds good. My reserach has two goals: To give people an idea of the
"best" options for a given version of the compiler, and to find problems
or inconsistencies in gcc. So I'll continue my tests on 3.4, then move
on to tree-ssa and 3.3.
Scott Robert Ladd
Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com)
Software Invention for High-Performance Computing