This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Matthew Wilcox <willy at debian dot org>, John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 18:09:49 -0400
Subject: Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?

On Wednesday, Aug 13, 2003, at 17:43 US/Eastern, Joe Buck wrote:

There's no argument on this issue: -pedantic is supposed to issue only
warnings.  It's a bug.

What are taking about, gcc used to error out with -pedantic when typename was missing. In fact there was a bug about that and was closed as invalid (a long time ago).


Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
  - From: Joe Buck

References:
- Re: Why does -pedantic make long long an error in C++?
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]