This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:47:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <200308111459.h7BExWHO009565@speedy.slc.redhat.com> <1060615843.3138.46.camel@frodo.toronto.redhat.com> <20030811194143.GE7767@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 15:41, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:

> I already have a separate patch for loop_exprs, I will send it soon.
> Concerning COND and SWITCH exprs, I will have to check how much work
> will there be with cleanups, but I don't think it should be somehow
> extremely hard.
> 
Excellent.  Removing the LOOP_EXPRs will be a great start.  As Andrew
mentioned recently, one of the regressions we have now wrt mainline is
the RTL optimizers not recognizing loops properly.


Diego.

References:
- Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
  - From: law
- Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]