This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: __declspec(selectany)

From: Jon Bright <jon at siliconcircus dot com>
To: dpaun at rogers dot com
Cc: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>, Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot OZ dot AU>,boaz at hishome dot net, wine-devel at winehq dot com,GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 08:23:07 +0200
Subject: Re: __declspec(selectany)
References: <3F302784.80903@kegel.com> <200308060031.07622.dpaun@rogers.com> <3F308EA4.7020607@kegel.com> <200308060103.33592.dpaun@rogers.com>

Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:

is the way to go. I think people that need selectany to
work should explicitly define it, so they are aware of
the potential problems, no?

On the other hand, they already are explicitly using it. It's not like selectany is going to be a common word in code, so if __declspec(selectany) appears, it's pretty likely the relevant party knows what they're up to?

--
Jon Bright
Lead Programmer, Silicon Circus Ltd.
http://www.siliconcircus.com

References:
- re: __declspec(selectany)
  - From: Dan Kegel
- Re: __declspec(selectany)
  - From: Dimitrie O. Paun
- Re: __declspec(selectany)
  - From: Dan Kegel
- Re: __declspec(selectany)
  - From: Dimitrie O. Paun

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]