This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: On inlining in C++

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
Cc: Matthias Benkmann <matthias at winterdrache dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 05 Aug 2003 21:32:51 +0200
Subject: Re: On inlining in C++
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0308051448390.14031-100000@bellatrix.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de><20030805200333.222d796c.matthias@winterdrache.de><1060110791.3735.92.camel@steven.lr-s.tudelft.nl>

Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> writes:

| Op di 05-08-2003, om 20:03 schreef Matthias Benkmann:
| > On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 15:00:49 +0200 (CEST) Richard Guenther
| > <rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
| > 
| > > The point is, all these "people will optimize" suggestions go against
| > > portability to different compilers.  
| > 
| > How many developers using GCC care about other compilers?
| 
| In the scientific community, most do.

Yes.  I myself got high interests in GCC when working on a European
scientific project, using C++.  
And I'm still working on scientific computing projects.  
I just don't mention it in my signature :-) 

-- Gaby

References:
- Re: On inlining in C++
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: On inlining in C++
  - From: Matthias Benkmann
- Re: On inlining in C++
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]