This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Loop optimizer issues
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: law at redhat dot com, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, pop at gauvain dot u-strasbg dot fr, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Date: 30 Jul 2003 02:06:05 -0300
- Subject: Re: Loop optimizer issues
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <200307291908.h6TJ8aFv013178@speedy.slc.redhat.com><87k7a13y24.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
On Jul 29, 2003, "Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> I'm thinking here about what makes sense for the project in general,
> and I'm sorry, but my conclusion is that either someone (mainline or
> tree-ssa) has to take the pain of a merge now, or else we lose the
> work gone into the rtlopt branch.
There's another way: merge tree-ssa into rtlopt branch and let people
test this new branch. If it's found to be stable enough, we can
switch focus from the tree-ssa branch to this updated rtlopt branch,
and merge that into mainline when 3.4 branches off mainline.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer