This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: std::pow implementation
Steven Bosscher <s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> writes:
| Op di 29-07-2003, om 15:05 schreef Gabriel Dos Reis:
| > | No, I've shown that inline still has a meaning in GCC whereas you
| > | claimed that "it was decided that the compiler knows better than the
| > | programmer", i.e. the compiler overrules the user.
| >
| > And what I claimed corresponds to reality. See
| >
| > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2003-05/msg00014.html
|
| You're just pointing to a mail that shows that warnings appeared after
| the fix for PR10180 and half a dozen duplicates went in (the first
| report being almost as old as the hard-coded limits in tree-inline.c,
| still cp/optimize.c back then).
Please do focuse on the message, not the medium.
The warnings are just the symptoms of a deeper disease, and I'm not
talking about the symptoms. But about the disease.
The deeper disease is explained in the follow-up to the link I gave.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2003-05/msg00012.html
-- Gaby