This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Label handling overhaul (C front end only)
- From: kaih at khms dot westfalen dot de (Kai Henningsen)
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Jul 2003 14:22:00 +0200
- Subject: Re: Label handling overhaul (C front end only)
- Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail.
- Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding?
- References: <87smp2jdnf.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <m37k6e59sq.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <87k7aej9xw.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <87k7aej9xw.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <m3vfty3tg8.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>
gdr@integrable-solutions.net (Gabriel Dos Reis) wrote on 20.07.03 in <m3vfty3tg8.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>:
> "Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:
> | has. If you don't like the way I made it work, you can submit a patch
> | to change it and argue over the semantics with people who do care.
> Everybody wants better internal structure and I don't doubt you need
> that. But the way you're conducting this issue calls for mess :-(
Frankly, how anyone can propose the semantics you did propose, contrast
those with Zack's, and call *Zack's* version "a mess", is beyond me.
Your proposed semantics are one of the worst-defined and most illogical I
ever heard, whereas Zack's version seems entirely obvious (and in fact a
clear improvement on what the language standard gives).
MfG Kai