This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Another issue with diagnostic format-checker


"Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:

| Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> writes:
| 
| > | > Do you consider WARN_FLAGS a crap?
| > | 
| > | Yes, 
| >
| > then I didn't here you voicing as vehemently as now.
| 
| Quite true.  It was unavoidable, so I didn't object.
| 
| > | but crap that cannot presently be avoided, since there is no way
| > | to override warning levels from within the source files themselves.
| >
| > s/way/reliable way/
| 
| Oh? Someone finally added #pragma GCC warning_control?

Did you miss the entire sentence?  If so, I strongly suggest you read
the message in a uneditable buffer.

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]