This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
- From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
- To: "Gerald Pfeifer" <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Cc: "Nathanael Nerode" <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>,"Wolfgang Bangerth" <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>,"Volker Reichelt" <reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de>,"Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de>,<ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org>,<gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 11:53:35 +0200
- Subject: Re: your RESOLVED->CLOSED changes
- References: <20030523071817.GA17455@doctormoo> <3eb901c32106$c561d7b0$c64f2697@bagio> <Pine.BSF.4.55.0305231129120.57698@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> As a side-note: I moved several PRs of mine to RESOLVED, incorrectly
> assuming this would "close" them.
>
> Clearly, this was operator error on my side, but it's a data point that
> we might consider removing the distinction between RESOLVED and CLOSED.
I don't think it's your "fault", because this is exactly what Bugzilla lets
you do right now. I'm doing the same as well right now. It's not such a big
issue because we have so many bugs in RESOLVED status, so a batch change is
needed anyway, somewhere in the future.
Right now, in order to change to CLOSED, you need to edit the bug two times,
and this is suboptimal. If we agree for removing the distinction, we'll
surely ask Danny to update the system accordingly (the best way is to modify
the commit actions so that they immediatly switch to the CLOSED status
instead of switching to the RESOLVED status).
Giovanni Bajo