This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bugzilla needs...
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- Cc: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 11:53:23 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: Bugzilla needs...
- References: <A45C364C-8CE4-11D7-85C9-000A95A34564@dberlin.org>
On Fri, 23 May 2003, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> Should I rewrite bug_status to only just describe non bug-life cycle
> things in a manner consistent with the descriptions in
> bugs/management.html?
> Then throw a comment in both the html of bug_status and management
> saying to make sure they stay in sync?
In my experience, this will lead to troubles down the road.
> Or should I add an exhaustive list of priorities, severities, and
> states to the bottom of bugs/management, and just have the hyperlinks
> currently going to bug_status point to the right places in each list?
That'd be my very strong preference!
Gerald
--
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/