This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?

From: Paul Koning <pkoning at equallogic dot com>
To: jbuck at synopsys dot com
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 17:03:35 -0400
Subject: Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
References: <E70D26A9CDD5C04D806EB8CA831D07210FC506@na1ecm61.dearborn.ford.com><20030501091710.A21602@synopsys.com><20030501174709.GD31113@redhat.com><20030501110633.A22198@synopsys.com>

>>>>> "Joe" == Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com> writes:

 Joe> -Wall has become de-facto standard, and one of my roles over the
 Joe> last decade or so has been to try to keep it that way (getting
 Joe> warnings taken out of -Wall if they can't be suppressed without
 Joe> either excessive pain or making the code worse).

I agree, which is why the offsetof change really bothers me.

  paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
  - From: Cook, Kelley (R.K.)
- Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]