This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
Cc: "Cook, Kelley (R.K.)" <kcook34 at ford dot com>, "'David O'Brien'" <obrien at freebsd dot org>, "'GCC'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 10:47:09 -0700
Subject: Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
References: <E70D26A9CDD5C04D806EB8CA831D07210FC506@na1ecm61.dearborn.ford.com> <20030501091710.A21602@synopsys.com>

On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 09:17:10AM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> (in that there doesn't appear to be a
> way to write a conforming C program that uses this standard means of
> getting a version identifier into the object file without producing a
> warning).

You forgot to add "and using -Wall".  The warning is not
produced with no "give me extra warnings" options.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
  - From: Joe Buck

References:
- Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
  - From: Cook, Kelley (R.K.)
- Re: Joy with new GCC 3.3 warnings -- HTF to shut them up?
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]