This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>,"gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 01 May 2003 12:40:36 -0400
Subject: Re: When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <20030501014135.GA14454@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> <1051770749.763.16.camel@steven> <20030501092659.C21602@synopsys.com>

On Thu, 2003-05-01 at 12:26, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 08:32:29AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > The SPEC scores so far don't show much runtime performance improvements
> > and compile time is still worse, too (I have also seen compiler
> > performance PRs that are fixed in tree-ssa because of GIMPLE, but...)
> 
> If this remains the case, no merge.  The compile-time degradation must
> stop.
>
Yes, of course.  I probably didn't stress my point about performance
strongly enough:  Compile and run time is an absolutely essential
requirement for the merge.

Please see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-05/msg00022.html


Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: When is stage 1 scheduled to close for 3.4?
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]