This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?)


>>>>> "DJ" == DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com> writes:

DJ> But it doesn't seem right that one Makefile out of the whole GCC
DJ> project has the right to change the rules for everyone by doing
DJ> something different.  Everyone else is going through the effort of
DJ> making the build work with any portable make, and the java
DJ> Makefile throws that effort away by making non-gnu makes break.

Now we're talking about different things.  Most of the GNU make
extensions in the libjava Makefile are there for different reasons.

I agree that removing them is a good idea.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]