This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?)
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>
- Cc: GCC Hackers <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 14 Mar 2003 14:19:47 -0700
- Subject: Re: Make includes (was Re: Time to update documenatiopn regarding supported make implementations?)
- References: <20030314201027.GA12922@doctormoo>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Nathanael" == Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com> writes:
Nathanael> Is it reasonable to design an autoconf test for Make
Nathanael> 'include' features (so that we can support .include,
Nathanael> include, and whatever other syntaxes are available); demand
Nathanael> that users use a Make with some such feature; and then use
Nathanael> @INCLUDE@ to do Make includes in a semi-portable manner?
Automake already has such a check.
I don't remember hearing about any make variant (in use today) that
doesn't have include, but then I haven't been actively involved with
automake for a while now.
Tom