This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
- From: Kaoru Fukui <k_fukui at highway dot ne dot jp>
- To: ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 02:37:50 +0900 (JST)
- Subject: Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3
- Reply-to: Kaoru Fukui <k_fukui at highway dot ne dot jp>
On 13 Feb, To: ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu wrote:
> On 12 Feb, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
>> I've heard some mention that 3.4 is faster in some cases than 3.3.
>>
>> I know several speedup tweeks have been made since the branch was
>> created. Not all of them have been backported.
>>
>> If they're not too invasive, let's consider them for 3.3. I'm willing
>> to help by regtesting patches if people can point out safe candidates.
>> Though I'd certainly appreciate assistance from others. :-)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --Kaveh
>> --
>> Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00377.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00560.htm
> There is Mike's info.
>
>
> I tried popcontext-fsf-2.diffs which is speedy, see below
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-02/msg00380.html
> gcc-3.3 doesn't pch, so it needs to adjust.
Sorry, it was that gcc-3.3 doesn't have pch
K