This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration)


On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:22:31AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> I'm also seeing those failures with the tarball I uploaded but not 
> on current version of gcc-3_2-branch (which will be the next
> iteration).  
> 
> I looked into the failures and cannot find out which patches could
> have possibly caused those failures.  All failures seem to be
> "syntax error".  I'm inclined to conlude that the environment I used
> to prepare the second iteration (which is at work) might be insane [it
> is the one which started the reduce/reduce conflit thread]. 
> 
> I would like you run the testsuite again but for current CVS
> gcc-3_2-branch and report the results.  Thank you very much for your
> time.  

Gabriel, just a heads up. the tarball does indeed appear to be broken.

Building from the tarball shows the failures whereas building from CVS is
fine for me:-

tarball:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-01/msg01382.html

CVS:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-01/msg01325.html


It is probably the bison thing as Paolo suggested. But I thought the
maintainer scripts were supposed to adjust the timestamps so as not to rely
on the bison in the user's environment. Dunno.

Greg


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]