gcc archive
date index for January, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

January 31, 2003
23:51 Re: Advanced diff with gcc... Ricardo Anguiano
23:42 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mike Stump
23:12 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Tom Lord
22:59 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Tom Lord
22:59 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Benjamin Kosnik
22:54 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Benjamin Kosnik
22:44 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Benjamin Kosnik
21:41 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Geoff Keating
21:35 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Andreas Tobler
21:34 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Joel Sherrill
21:27 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:21 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 David Edelsohn
21:13 Update - Gcc Summit Andrew J. Hutton
21:07 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Devang Patel
21:02 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Phil Edwards
20:59 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Joel Sherrill
20:57 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Andreas Jaeger
20:52 Re: PCH errors Craig Rodrigues
20:51 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Tom Tromey
20:43 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Ziemowit Laski
20:37 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Tom Tromey
20:31 Re: g77 character strings are not terminated? Toon Moene
20:23 Re: [3.2] Can ada/6160 be cured from 3.3 or trunk? Geert Bosch
20:22 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Devang Patel
20:05 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Joel Sherrill
19:44 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mike Stump
19:41 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Joseph S. Myers
19:34 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Joe Buck
19:22 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Devang Patel
19:21 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Joe Buck
19:19 Re: PCH errors Richard Guenther
19:13 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Geoff Keating
19:12 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Graham Stott
19:07 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Richard Henderson
19:05 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mark Mitchell
19:02 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Geoff Keating
19:01 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mark Mitchell
18:52 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Matt Austern
18:48 Re: PCH errors Joe Buck
18:44 Re: Advanced diff with gcc... Joe Buck
18:28 Re: gxx_personality_v0 undefined - 2.96 Libraries 3.2 GCC J. Scott Edwards
18:07 gcj: NoSuchAlgorithmException Anton Kuranov
18:06 Re: [PATCH] rtlopt branch merge part 5 -- loop unswitching Joseph S. Myers
18:02 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Joseph S. Myers
18:00 Re: double error Andreas Conz
17:54 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Devang Patel
17:53 Re: .debug_loc Daniel Berlin
17:35 Advanced diff with gcc... Fabrizio Morbini
17:35 Re: [3.2] Can ada/6160 be cured from 3.3 or trunk? Christian Cornelssen
17:33 double error Bob Hou
17:21 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Joe Buck
17:11 Re: .debug_loc Keith Walker
16:52 .debug_loc Michal Ludvig
16:51 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mark Mitchell
16:41 Re: script to automate binary search for regression Phil Edwards
16:40 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Wolfgang Bangerth
16:29 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mark Mitchell
16:01 Re: x86 libffi installs broken in mainline Christian Cornelssen
16:00 PCH errors Richard Guenther
15:48 GCC 3.2.1 manual Ken Morgan
15:10 x86 libffi installs broken in mainline Andrew Haley
15:00 Re: What CPU ports should have working Ada? Andreas Schwab
14:52 x86 libffi installs broken in mainline Diego Novillo
14:43 Re: What CPU ports should have working Ada? Joel Sherrill
14:27 Re: [PATCH] rtlopt branch merge part 5 -- loop unswitching Richard Earnshaw
14:18 Re: [PATCH] rtlopt branch merge part 5 -- loop unswitching Richard Kenner
13:53 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Richard Kenner
13:51 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Michael S. Zick
13:50 Re: What CPU ports should have working Ada? Andreas Schwab
13:36 What CPU ports should have working Ada? Joel Sherrill
13:31 Re: [PATCH] rtlopt branch merge part 5 -- loop unswitching Zdenek Dvorak
13:29 Re: [PATCH] rtlopt branch merge part 5 -- loop unswitching Robert Dewar
13:26 Re: [PATCH] rtlopt branch merge part 5 -- loop unswitching Richard Kenner
12:54 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Gabriel Dos Reis
11:52 Successful build of gcc-3.2.1 Jordan Radkev
11:16 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Paolo Carlini
11:07 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Joseph S. Myers
11:07 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Joseph S. Myers
11:03 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Joseph S. Myers
10:56 GCC 3.3 3.4 ... Lars Segerlund
10:52 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Nathan Sidwell
10:48 Disabling test cases in gcc.dg D.Venkatasubramanian, Noida
10:45 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict inobjc-parse.y Joseph S. Myers
10:39 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Richard Earnshaw
10:25 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Tom Lord
08:08 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Bernd Jendrissek
07:49 Re: patch that caused part of the compile-time regression in PRopt/8361 Andreas Jaeger
07:49 Re: GCC 3.2.x miscompiles X Andreas Jaeger
07:39 -pthread Gerhard Stroehlein
06:09 patch that caused part of the compile-time regression in PR opt/8361 Janis Johnson
05:31 Re: GCC 3.2.x miscompiles X Aaron Lehmann
05:28 Re: possible bug Fergus Henderson
05:15 Re: GCC 3.2.1 -> GCC 3.3 compile speed regression Fergus Henderson
04:12 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mike Stump
03:57 Re: Which dejagnu version do we require? Daniel Jacobowitz
03:51 Re: possible bug Alexandre Oliva
03:12 Re: GCC 3.2.1 -> GCC 3.3 compile speed regression Zack Weinberg
02:44 GCC 3.2.1 -> GCC 3.3 compile speed regression Ziemowit Laski
02:40 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Zack Weinberg
02:21 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Joe Buck
02:14 Which dejagnu version do we require? Gerald Pfeifer
02:08 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Gabriel Dos Reis
02:04 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Wolfgang Bangerth
01:59 Re: gxx_personality_v0 undefined - 2.96 Libraries 3.2 GCC Joe Buck
01:58 Re: Disappearing arrow Joe Buck
01:55 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Greg Schafer
01:54 Implementing export for g++ Steven King
01:54 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Joe Buck
01:52 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Geoff Keating
01:34 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Gabriel Dos Reis
01:27 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Greg Schafer
01:25 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mike Stump
01:22 Re: Bison-1.875, again! (Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration)) Gabriel Dos Reis
01:16 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Joe Buck
01:14 Bison-1.875, again! (Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration)) Paolo Carlini
01:10 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mike Stump
01:06 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mike Stump
00:59 POC for GCC ARM back end? Randall Smith
00:56 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Benjamin Kosnik
00:52 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Zack Weinberg
00:41 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Gerald Pfeifer
00:37 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Benjamin Kosnik
00:36 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Gabriel Dos Reis
00:33 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Gabriel Dos Reis
00:30 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Gabriel Dos Reis
00:29 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Benjamin Kosnik
00:25 PATCH for Re: Remove EGCS symlink from CVS? Gerald Pfeifer
00:22 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Gabriel Dos Reis
00:21 Re: possible bug Andrew Morton
00:17 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Zack Weinberg
00:15 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mike Stump
00:13 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Benjamin Kosnik
00:13 Re: possible bug Jan Hubicka
00:11 possible bug Andrew Morton

January 30, 2003
23:59 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Neil Booth
23:55 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Phil Edwards
23:53 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Matt Austern
23:49 Re: CFG using gcc Jan Hubicka
23:47 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Neil Booth
23:41 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Benjamin Kosnik
23:38 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Neil Booth
23:34 Re: ABI breakage in 3.2.1, 3.3 and mainline Jan Hubicka
23:33 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mike Stump
23:31 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Paolo Carlini
23:25 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Ziemowit Laski
23:22 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mike Stump
22:58 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Karel Gardas
22:57 Re: Irix6 native long double libcalls progress report (and problem) Richard Henderson
22:56 RE: Linux Number Crunching: Benchmarking Compilers and Languages on ia32 Scott Robert Ladd
22:43 g77 character strings are not terminated? mmcohen
22:15 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Paolo Bonzini
22:04 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Gabriel Dos Reis
21:52 RE: Linux Number Crunching: Benchmarking Compilers and Languages on ia32 Steven Anderson
21:51 Irix6 native long double libcalls progress report (and problem) Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:42 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Michael S. Zick
21:29 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Michael Matz
21:18 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Michael S. Zick
20:59 gcc3.2.2 (second iteraction) succesfull bootstrap on FreeBSD 5.0 Karel Gardas
20:21 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Neil Booth
20:15 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Neil Booth
20:11 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Joseph S. Myers
20:00 Re: draft 3.2.2 release notes (second draft) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:58 Re: draft 3.2.2 release notes (second draft) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:52 CFG using gcc Nikhil Bansal
19:20 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mike Stump
19:07 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mark Mitchell
18:49 Disappearing arrow Marilyn Davis
18:42 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mark Mitchell
18:40 gxx_personality_v0 undefined - 2.96 Libraries 3.2 GCC J. Scott Edwards
18:34 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mike Stump
18:33 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 David Edelsohn
18:29 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Benjamin Kosnik
18:20 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mark Mitchell
18:15 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mark Mitchell
18:05 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Matt Austern
18:04 Re: GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mike Stump
17:59 3.4 parser bug, error: non-lvalue in unary `&'? Craig Rodrigues
17:57 Re: draft 3.2.2 release notes (second draft) Richard Earnshaw
15:59 Re: draft 3.2.2 release notes (second draft) Joe Buck
15:56 Re: Stack frame problem. Joe Buck
15:39 Re: Irix6 casting long double to double yields bogus results Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:30 [ tree-ssa ] May alias speed improvements law
14:54 Linking Prolog,C and C++ CARLOS EGEA
14:04 compound expr in trees Per Fransson
14:00 ABI breakage in 3.2.1, 3.3 and mainline Gerald Pfeifer
12:59 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Gabriel Dos Reis
11:22 Re: C++ template parameter constraints Gabriel Dos Reis
11:07 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Gabriel Dos_Reis
11:02 Re: draft 3.2.2 release notes (second draft) Richard Earnshaw
09:26 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Volker Reichelt
09:20 Re: draft 3.2.2 release notes (second draft) Volker Reichelt
09:05 Stack frame problem. pascal.pype
08:44 RE: "clrmac" in gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-22.c on H8300S D.Venkatasubramanian, Noida
08:18 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict inobjc-parse.y Mark Mitchell
08:14 Re: equality of label addresses Fergus Henderson
08:05 "clrmac" in gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-22.c on H8300S D.Venkatasubramanian, Noida
07:32 GCC 3.3, GCC 3.4 Mark Mitchell
06:56 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Neil Booth
05:53 Re: Bug with -finline-functions and va_start on FreeBSD Loren James Rittle
04:40 Re: Bug with -finline-functions and va_start on FreeBSD Bill Wendling
04:27 GCC 3.2.x miscompiles X Aaron Lehmann
04:20 Re: Irix6 casting long double to double yields bogus results Alexandre Oliva
03:54 Re: Bug with -finline-functions and va_start on FreeBSD Loren James Rittle
03:40 Re: C++ template parameter constraints Alexandre Oliva
02:35 C++ template parameter constraints Martin Buchholz
02:07 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:01 Re: gcj compile question Anthony Green
01:43 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Ziemowit Laski
01:28 gcj compile question Xiaorong Xiang
00:54 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict inobjc-parse.y Joseph S. Myers
00:39 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Ziemowit Laski
00:10 loading C++ objects in other languages? Joseph
00:08 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Joe Buck

January 29, 2003
23:39 Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf Peter Barada
23:18 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict inobjc-parse.y Joseph S. Myers
23:09 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Joe Buck
23:07 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Joe Buck
22:53 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Paolo Carlini
22:50 Re: One more limits question Richard Henderson
22:45 GNAT dream with 3.2.2 pre-release for i686 and m6811-elf Stephane Carrez
22:31 Re: draft 3.2.2 release notes (second draft) Toon Moene
22:29 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release [and PR 9493] Eric Botcazou
22:25 Re: mainline bootstrap: problems with gengtype.c change Geoff Keating
22:21 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Mark Mitchell
22:16 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Geoff Keating
22:13 Re: "using" directive bug Mark Mitchell
22:10 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release [and PR 9493] Jan Hubicka
22:05 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release [and PR 9493] Joe Buck
21:55 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Joe Buck
21:50 Re: Bug with -finline-functions and va_start on FreeBSD Bill Wendling
21:49 Re: One more limits question Mark Mitchell
21:47 Re: type definitions? Tolga Dalman
21:41 Re: "using" directive bug Neil Booth
21:10 Re: One more limits question Richard Henderson
21:06 Re: One more limits question Mark Mitchell
20:50 Re: One more limits question Richard Henderson
20:43 One more limits question Mark Mitchell
20:37 mainline bootstrap: problems with gengtype.c change Benjamin Kosnik
20:28 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Mark Mitchell
20:07 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release [and PR 9493] Eric Botcazou
20:04 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Theodore Papadopoulo
19:45 Re: Bug with -finline-functions and va_start on FreeBSD Joe Buck
19:40 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Phil Edwards
19:33 draft 3.2.2 release notes (second draft) Joe Buck
19:20 type definitions? Dung V Nguyen
19:20 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Mark Mitchell
19:06 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Phil Edwards
19:00 Re: equality of label addresses Richard Henderson
18:53 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Andi Kleen
18:50 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Matt Austern
18:49 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Richard Henderson
18:30 Bug with -finline-functions and va_start on FreeBSD Bill Wendling
18:10 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release [and PR 9493] Gabriel Dos Reis
18:07 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Gabriel Dos Reis
17:51 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release [and PR 9493] Joe Buck
17:51 Irix6 casting long double to double yields bogus results Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:47 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Mark Mitchell
17:47 Re: "using" directive bug Hans Utz
17:26 http://www.interhoney.com Richard Halsall
17:23 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Gabriel Dos Reis
17:10 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Gabriel Dos Reis
17:07 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Richard Henderson
17:03 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Mark Mitchell
16:54 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Michael Matz
16:49 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Mark Mitchell
16:46 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Mark Mitchell
16:25 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Richard Earnshaw
16:15 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:37 RE: "using" directive bug Lev Assinovsky
15:28 Re: "using" directive bug Hans Utz
15:26 GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) Gabriel Dos_Reis
15:11 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Gabriel Dos Reis
14:57 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Phil Edwards
14:46 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Gabriel Dos Reis
14:30 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Phil Edwards
13:39 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release Gabriel Dos_Reis
13:19 "using" directive bug Lev Assinovsky
13:13 Re: C++ parser issue [templ.res] Richard Guenther
12:44 Re: C++ parser issue [templ.res] Jan Van Dijk
12:41 successfully built and installed ... lldb
12:34 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release Eric Botcazou
12:20 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Andi Kleen
11:45 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Richard Earnshaw
10:07 Re: Build error - still there Pedro Manuel Augusto
10:06 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
08:39 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Gabriel Dos Reis
08:33 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Gabriel Dos Reis
08:30 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Gabriel Dos Reis
08:18 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Richard Henderson
08:10 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Mark Mitchell
08:06 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Mark Mitchell
08:01 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Richard Henderson
07:27 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Richard Henderson
07:17 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Gabriel Dos Reis
06:56 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Neil Booth
06:17 Re: Invalid code in <limits> Gabriel Dos Reis
06:02 Invalid code in <limits> Mark Mitchell
05:17 Re: RFC: Named warnings Ben Elliston
04:32 Re: equality of label addresses Robert Dewar
04:09 Re: Uberbaum tree broken for m68k-elf Christopher Faylor
04:07 equality of label addresses Fergus Henderson
02:18 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release Joe Buck
01:49 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release Gabriel Dos_Reis
01:32 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:54 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release Joe Buck
00:49 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Ziemowit Laski
00:44 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Segher Boessenkool
00:42 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Segher Boessenkool
00:35 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Stan Shebs

January 28, 2003
23:56 Re: new target Gerald Pfeifer
23:38 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict inobjc-parse.y Joseph S. Myers
23:30 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Ziemowit Laski
23:08 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict inobjc-parse.y Joseph S. Myers
22:57 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Ziemowit Laski
22:07 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Andi Kleen
22:00 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Matt Austern
21:39 Re: combining -MD with -MG leads to unexpected(?) behaviour Robert Schiele
21:19 Re: GNAT nightmarre Robert Dewar
21:11 Re: GNAT nightmarre Gerald Pfeifer
20:39 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
20:23 Re: [3.2] Can ada/6160 be cured from 3.3 or trunk? Christian Cornelssen
20:02 Re: [3.2] Can ada/6160 be cured from 3.3 or trunk? Robert Dewar
19:58 Re: [3.2] Can ada/6160 be cured from 3.3 or trunk? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:53 Re: [3.2] Can ada/6160 be cured from 3.3 or trunk? Geert Bosch
19:52 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release Gabriel Dos_Reis
19:47 Re: [3.2] Can ada/6160 be cured from 3.3 or trunk? Christian Cornelssen
19:40 Re: GNAT nightmarre Gabriel Dos Reis
19:37 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release Ulrich Weigand
19:32 Re: GNAT nightmarre Michael Matz
19:23 Re: GNAT nightmarre Gabriel Dos Reis
19:21 Re: C++ parser issue [templ.res] Gabriel Dos Reis
19:20 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release Gabriel Dos Reis
19:11 Re: [C++] Compile-Time Reflection Branch Gabriel Dos_Reis
18:47 Re: Uberbaum tree broken for m68k-elf Graham Stott
17:47 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Rainer Orth
17:41 Re: gcc3.2.1 compilation failure on FreeBSD 5.0 Gerald Pfeifer
17:32 Re: [3.2] Can ada/6160 be cured from 3.3 or trunk? Geert Bosch
17:31 Re: [C++] Compile-Time Reflection Branch Mark Mitchell
17:31 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:29 Re: C++ parser issue [templ.res] Mark Mitchell
17:13 Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release Joe Buck
17:10 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:52 Re: combining -MD with -MG leads to unexpected(?) behaviour Zack Weinberg
16:46 Re: GNAT nightmarre Alexandre Oliva
16:43 Re: gcc-3.2.1 / SPARC Solaris 7 11/99 Alexandre Oliva
16:29 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
16:23 Re: GNAT nightmarre Robert Dewar
16:01 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
15:55 Re: GNAT nightmarre Gabriel Dos Reis
15:52 Re: [C++] Compile-Time Reflection Branch Diego Novillo
15:50 Re: [3.2] Can ada/6160 be cured from 3.3 or trunk? Christian Cornelssen
14:58 Re: [3.2] Can ada/6160 be cured from 3.3 or trunk? Richard Kenner
14:55 Re: GNAT nightmarre Robert Dewar
14:51 Re: [3.2] Can ada/6160 be cured from 3.3 or trunk? Christian Cornelssen
14:46 Re: [3.2] Can ada/6160 be cured from 3.3 or trunk? Gabriel Dos Reis
14:44 Re: GNAT nightmarre Gabriel Dos Reis
14:43 Re: GNAT nightmarre Gabriel Dos Reis
14:27 combining -MD with -MG leads to unexpected(?) behaviour Robert Schiele
14:23 Re: GNAT nightmarre Richard Kenner
14:19 Re: [3.2] Can ada/6160 be cured from 3.3 or trunk? Richard Kenner
14:19 Re: GNAT nightmarre Geert Bosch
14:18 Re: GNAT nightmarre Robert Dewar
14:17 Re: GNAT nightmarre Gabriel Dos Reis
14:15 Re: GNAT nightmarre Gabriel Dos Reis
14:14 Re: GNAT nightmarre Robert Dewar
14:13 Re: GNAT nightmarre Robert Dewar
14:07 Re: [C++] Compile-Time Reflection Branch Gabriel Dos Reis
14:04 Re: [3.2] Can ada/6160 be cured from 3.3 or trunk? Gabriel Dos Reis
14:04 Re: GNAT nightmarre Richard Kenner
14:02 Re: [C++] Compile-Time Reflection Branch Gerald Pfeifer
13:54 Re: GNAT nightmarre Gabriel Dos Reis
13:42 Re: Slightly more extended example for named diagnostics Bruce Korb
13:29 Re: [C++] Compile-Time Reflection Branch Phil Edwards
13:12 Re: GNAT nightmarre Robert Dewar
12:48 Re: gcc3.2.1 compilation failure on FreeBSD 5.0 Karel Gardas
12:43 Re: gcc3.2.1 compilation failure on FreeBSD 5.0 Gabriel Dos Reis
12:30 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Paolo Bonzini
11:39 Re: gcc3.2.1 compilation failure on FreeBSD 5.0 Gerald Pfeifer
11:02 [C++] Compile-Time Reflection Branch Gabriel Dos_Reis
10:01 Re: C++ parser issue [templ.res] Nathan Sidwell
09:29 optimization for GCC on PPC Joakim Tjernlund
09:14 Re: C++ parser issue [templ.res] Gabriel Dos Reis
09:12 GCC-3.2.2 pre-release Gabriel Dos_Reis
08:07 C++ parser issue [templ.res] Jan Van Dijk
07:35 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Gabriel Dos Reis
07:30 Re: Slightly more extended example for named diagnostics Joseph S. Myers
07:17 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict inobjc-parse.y Joseph S. Myers
07:11 Re: strcat and config/darwin.c Richard Henderson
06:26 Re: REQ: naked attribute on x86 Richard Henderson
05:54 Re: GNAT nightmarre Gabriel Dos Reis
05:46 Re: GNAT nightmarre Gabriel Dos Reis
05:43 Re: GNAT nightmarre Geert Bosch
05:31 Re: GNAT nightmarre Robert Dewar
05:19 Re: gcc3.2.1 compilation failure on FreeBSD 5.0 Karel Gardas
05:18 Re: GNAT nightmarre Gabriel Dos Reis
05:07 Re: GNAT nightmarre Robert Dewar
05:00 Re: login to gcc.gnu.org broken Zack Weinberg
04:52 GNAT nightmarre Gabriel Dos Reis
04:06 Re: New tree code anon_decl leads to abort of dwarf2out.c:gen_decl_die Daniel Jacobowitz
03:58 benchmarks GATMKORN
03:35 Re: Binutils Ben Elliston
03:29 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Tom Tromey
03:01 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Gabriel Dos_Reis
02:54 gcc-3.2.1 / SPARC Solaris 7 11/99 Robert Fann
02:32 Re: Slightly more extended example for named diagnostics Bruce Korb
02:23 Re: gcc3.2.1 compilation failure on FreeBSD 5.0 Gabriel Dos Reis
02:20 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:18 Re: login to gcc.gnu.org broken Joern Rennecke
02:01 New tree code anon_decl leads to abort of dwarf2out.c:gen_decl_die Joern Rennecke
01:58 Re: gcc3.2.1 compilation failure on FreeBSD 5.0 Joe Buck
01:47 Uberbaum tree broken for m68k-elf Peter Barada
01:38 Re: gcc3.2.1 compilation failure on FreeBSD 5.0 Gerald Pfeifer
01:15 C++ template instantiations and weak symbols? Craig Rodrigues
01:05 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Gerald Pfeifer
00:59 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Zack Weinberg
00:47 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Matt Austern
00:44 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Alexandre Oliva
00:37 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Zack Weinberg
00:23 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Ziemowit Laski
00:15 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Ziemowit Laski
00:03 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Wolfgang Bangerth

January 27, 2003
23:20 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Geoff Keating
23:12 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Mike Stump
23:10 gcc-3.2.1 configury bug due to FSF binutils version string Greg Schafer
22:56 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Andi Kleen
22:52 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Geoff Keating
22:52 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Matt Austern
22:32 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Gabriel Dos Reis
22:30 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Mike Stump
22:18 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict inobjc-parse.y Raja R Harinath
22:09 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Gabriel Dos Reis
22:03 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Neil Booth
22:03 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Gabriel Dos Reis
22:02 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict inobjc-parse.y Joseph S. Myers
21:59 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Geoff Keating
21:55 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Paolo Carlini
21:52 Re: GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Gabriel Dos Reis
21:40 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Mark Wielaard
21:30 GCC-3.2.2 bootstrap FAILURE: 1 reduce/reduce conflict in objc-parse.y Gabriel Dos_Reis
20:34 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Diego Novillo
20:21 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Joe Buck
20:17 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Diego Novillo
20:12 Re: Bad performance (regression) on oopack's Complex test Paolo Carlini
20:08 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Zack Weinberg
20:08 Questions regarding options. N V Krishna
20:07 Re: Using GCC as code generator Jim Wilson
19:55 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Andi Kleen
19:53 Re: RFC: Named warnings Jim Wilson
19:52 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Benjamin Kosnik
19:50 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Benjamin Kosnik
19:49 Re: Bugzilla for GCC project? Joseph S. Myers
19:43 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Andi Kleen
19:38 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Matt Austern
19:33 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Daniel Berlin
19:28 Re: Java 3.3 regression details from sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Jeff Sturm
19:24 Re: Bugzilla for GCC project? Daniel Berlin
19:08 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Phil Edwards
19:05 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults David Edelsohn
19:01 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Benjamin Kosnik
18:56 Re: Bugzilla for GCC project? Joseph S. Myers
18:49 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Andi Kleen
18:38 Re: libraries for Pentium 4 Robert Dewar
18:35 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Benjamin Kosnik
18:26 Re: Java 3.3 regression details from sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Andrew Haley
18:22 Re: Recent Ada ACATS regressions Laurent Guerby
18:21 Re: Java 3.3 regression details from sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Jeff Sturm
18:03 Re: Bugzilla for GCC project? Daniel Berlin
17:59 Re: Gcc and Informix 7.31 Jeff Sturm
17:52 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Tom Tromey
17:51 Re: libraries for Pentium 4 Joel Sherrill
17:47 Binutils Diego Morales
17:46 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Christian Ehrhardt
17:39 Gcc and Informix 7.31 Diego Morales
17:38 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Joe Buck
17:20 libraries for Pentium 4 GATMKORN
17:14 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Joe Buck
17:07 gcc-ss-20030127 is now available gccadmin
17:01 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Eric W. Biederman
17:00 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Andi Kleen
16:55 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Zack Weinberg
16:47 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Andi Kleen
16:39 Re: default output file of gcc in the absence of -o Jan Beulich
16:26 Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Benjamin Kosnik
16:11 gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults Andi Kleen
15:59 gcc3.2.1 compilation failure on FreeBSD 5.0 Karel Gardas
15:46 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Paul Schlie
15:40 Re: Bugzilla for GCC project? David Edelsohn
15:40 Re: Bad performance (regression) on oopack's Complex test Jan Hubicka
15:02 Re: Bad performance (regression) on oopack's Complex test Paolo Carlini
14:45 Re: Bugzilla for GCC project? Kai Henningsen
14:44 Re: Recent Ada ACATS regressions Robert Dewar
14:31 Re: Bad performance (regression) on oopack's Complex test Falk Hueffner
14:29 Re: Recent Ada ACATS regressions Joel Sherrill
14:02 RE: Recent Ada ACATS regressions Jerry van Dijk
13:47 Bad performance (regression) on oopack's Complex test Paolo Carlini
13:30 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Nicola Pero
12:19 Re: Recent Ada ACATS regressions Robert Dewar
11:55 default output file of gcc in the absence of -o Andrew Haley
11:54 Re: Recent Ada ACATS regressions Laurent Guerby
11:49 PATCH for Re: Update of email Gerald Pfeifer
11:43 default output file of gcc in the absence of -o Jan Beulich
11:40 Re: PATCH for Re: Update of email James Michael DuPont
10:41 C++ and C99 designators in array initialization Andrey Slepuhin
10:40 Re: Recent Ada ACATS regressions Arnaud Charlet
10:27 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Richard Earnshaw
10:18 RE: Recent Ada ACATS regressions Jerry van Dijk
10:17 Re: Update of email James Michael DuPont
09:17 Re: optimizer problem in linux-mips gcc-3.2? Eric Botcazou
09:17 Re: Update of email Gerald Pfeifer
08:00 Re: mapping between system calls and libc functions Alexandre Oliva
07:36 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Alexandre Oliva
06:46 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
06:36 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
05:50 Java 3.3 regression details from sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Kaveh R. Ghazi
05:32 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Geoff Keating
05:28 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Kaveh R. Ghazi
05:02 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:27 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Per Bothner
04:03 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Fergus Henderson
02:55 Re: Recent Ada ACATS regressions Robert Dewar
02:08 Re: Recent Ada ACATS regressions Richard Kenner
02:05 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Nicola Pero
01:21 gcc-3.2 dummyspit Andrew Morton
01:20 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Paul Schlie
00:56 mapping between system calls and libc functions James Lee

January 26, 2003
23:54 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Nicola Pero
23:28 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Kai Henningsen
22:00 optimizer problem in linux-mips gcc-3.2? Guido Guenther
21:54 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Nicola Pero
21:25 Re: Strange gcc specific warning Tolga Dalman
21:24 Re: Slightly extended example for named warnings Bruce Korb
21:16 Re: [ssa-branch]using libbanshee with gcc Daniel Berlin
21:00 Re: Slightly extended example for named warnings Joseph S. Myers
20:41 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Russ Allbery
20:31 Recent Ada ACATS regressions Laurent Guerby
20:28 Slightly extended example for named warnings Bruce Korb
19:26 REQ: naked attribute on x86 mstr
18:40 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Richard Henderson
18:21 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
17:02 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:14 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Michael S. Zick
16:08 comparing 3.2 and 3.3 testresults on {alpha,hppa,i386,ia64,powerpc,sparc}-linux Matthias Klose
15:58 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Albert Chin
15:36 Re: ARM interrupts Nick Clifton
15:20 Re: ARM interrupts Nick Clifton
14:47 Re: [ssa-branch]using libbanshee with gcc Andreas Jaeger
14:45 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:00 Re: [ssa-branch]using libbanshee with gcc Andrew Pinski
12:50 strcat and config/darwin.c Andrew Pinski
12:49 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
12:21 Re: login to gcc.gnu.org broken Ben Elliston
12:20 Re: login to gcc.gnu.org broken Ben Elliston
12:07 Re: RFC: Named warnings Nix
10:53 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
10:45 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Neil Booth
10:42 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Neil Booth
10:07 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
09:30 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
09:21 Re: where is gcc for windows? Marcel Cox
09:19 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Timothy J. Wood
09:17 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
09:12 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
09:09 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
09:06 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
09:03 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
09:00 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
07:47 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Zack Weinberg
07:27 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Peter Barada
07:25 Re: Broken function reference error? Alexandre Oliva
07:19 Re: two constructor copies question, again Alexandre Oliva
07:14 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Timothy J. Wood
06:59 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Tom Tromey
06:37 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Zack Weinberg
06:23 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Jeff Sturm
06:16 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Gareth Pearce
06:10 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Timothy J. Wood
06:08 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Zack Weinberg
05:57 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Zack Weinberg
05:51 Re: where is gcc for windows? Christopher Faylor
05:49 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Timothy J. Wood
05:33 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Zack Weinberg
05:29 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Timothy J. Wood
05:14 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:48 where is gcc for windows? Jim Julian
04:43 Re: Listing and removing unused objects AWLaFramboise
04:29 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Tom Tromey
04:11 Re: Listing and removing unused objects Kazu Hirata
03:56 Listing and removing unused objects AWLaFramboise
02:56 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:55 Re: [ssa-branch]using libbanshee with gcc Daniel Berlin
01:44 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Peter Barada
01:37 Re: RFC: Named warnings Segher Boessenkool
00:51 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Geoffrey Keating
00:15 Re: #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Neil Booth
00:06 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Tom Tromey
00:00 #import future (summary and proposed solutions) Geoffrey Keating

January 25, 2003
23:42 [ssa-branch]using libbanshee with gcc Andrew Pinski
21:11 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Andreas Jaeger
20:53 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Jan Hubicka
20:48 Re: Excess errors in testcases (was Re: [RFC] g++.dg/parse/undefined1.C fails) Volker Reichelt
20:46 build success 2.95.3 on i486-pc-sysv4.0 Tom Louwrier
20:37 Re: Excess errors in testcases (was Re: [RFC]g++.dg/parse/undefined1.C fails) Mark Mitchell
20:22 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Tom Tromey
20:17 Excess errors in testcases (was Re: [RFC] g++.dg/parse/undefined1.C fails) Volker Reichelt
20:15 Re: RFC: Named Warnings (example code) Bruce Korb
19:30 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Mark Mitchell
19:05 Re: login to gcc.gnu.org broken Christopher Faylor
17:08 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Diego Novillo
16:36 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Roger Sayle
14:55 PATCH to global.c [3.3] (was Re: Gabriel Dos Reis will be RM for the 3.2.2 release) Gabriel Dos Reis
14:00 Re: RFC: Named warnings Fergus Henderson
11:03 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Neil Booth
10:26 Re: login to gcc.gnu.org broken Josef Zlomek
10:09 Re: [PATCH] rtlopt merge part 1 -- loop analysis (resent) Zdenek Dvorak
10:09 Re: Where is fold_trunc_transparent_mathfn? Jan Hubicka
09:40 Re: login to gcc.gnu.org broken Joern Rennecke
09:36 Re: Where is fold_trunc_transparent_mathfn? Andreas Tobler
08:55 login to gcc.gnu.org broken Joern Rennecke
08:48 Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment Paolo Carlini
06:53 Re: RFC: Named warnings Falk Hueffner
06:46 Update of email James Michael DuPont
04:55 Re: RFC: Named warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
03:46 Re: RFC: Named warnings Segher Boessenkool
03:26 Re: resend - [patch] Ada bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 Geert Bosch
03:21 Re: RFC: Named warnings Robert Dewar
02:06 Re: A Simple Question Ricardo Anguiano
02:05 3.3-branch QA assessment Joe Buck
00:34 Re: RFC: Named warnings Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci
00:03 Re: RFC: Named warnings Oscar Fuentes

January 24, 2003
23:47 Re: RFC: Named warnings Stan Shebs
23:39 Re: Where is fold_trunc_transparent_mathfn? Steven Bosscher
23:24 Re: RFC: Named warnings Mark Mitchell
23:17 Re: RFC: Named warnings Neil Booth
23:15 Re: RFC: Named warnings Matt Austern
23:03 Re: RFC: Named warnings Robert Dewar
23:00 Where is fold_trunc_transparent_mathfn? Andreas Schwab
22:58 Re: RFC: Named warnings Oscar Fuentes
22:39 Re: RFC: Named warnings Mark Mitchell
22:35 Re: Using GCC as code generator Eric Christopher
22:25 Re: RFC: Named warnings DJ Delorie
22:12 Re: RFC: Named warnings Stan Shebs
21:43 Re: RFC: Named warnings Geert Bosch
21:43 Re: [RFC] g++.dg/parse/undefined1.C fails Mark Mitchell
21:42 Re: RFC: Named warnings Robert Dewar
21:40 Re: [RFC] GCC vs Bison-1.875 Paolo Carlini
21:39 Re: RFC: Named warnings Neil Booth
21:39 Number of test FAILs increasing drastically on alpha Brad Lucier
21:38 [RFC] g++.dg/parse/undefined1.C fails Paolo Carlini
21:37 Re: RFC: Named warnings Robert Dewar
21:27 Re: Patch for GCC 3.2.2 Gabriel Dos Reis
21:26 Re: [RFC] GCC vs Bison-1.875 Richard Henderson
21:25 Re: RFC: Named warnings Neil Booth
21:20 Re: patch that caused regression PR optimization/4382 Richard Henderson
21:15 Re: RFC: Named warnings Robert Dewar
20:54 Re: RFC: Named warnings Bruce Korb
20:50 Re: RFC: Named warnings Joseph S. Myers
20:50 Using GCC as code generator Hong Lin
20:39 [RFC] GCC vs Bison-1.875 Paolo Carlini
20:27 Re: RFC: Named warnings DJ Delorie
20:23 g77: common block with C mixed code Mangesh M Kale
20:08 Re: RFC: Named warnings Matt Austern
20:04 Re: RFC: Named warnings Joseph S. Myers
20:03 Re: RFC: Named warnings Tom Tromey
19:49 Re: RFC: Named warnings Neil Booth
19:46 Re: RFC: Named warnings Neil Booth
19:27 Re: RFC: Named warnings Bruce Korb
19:12 what causes the Signal 11 Robert McNulty Junior
19:10 Re: RFC: Named warnings DJ Delorie
19:05 Re: RFC: Named warnings Tom Tromey
18:49 The Linux binutils 2.13.90.0.18 is rleased H. J. Lu
18:39 Re: RFC: Named warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
18:18 Re: RFC: Named warnings Stan Shebs
18:13 Re: RFC: Named warnings Kevin Handy
18:13 Re: RFC: Named warnings Stan Shebs
18:13 Re: RFC: Named warnings Richard Earnshaw
18:11 Re: RFC: Named warnings Robert Dewar
18:11 Re: RFC: Named warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
18:07 Re: RFC: Named warnings Alexandre Oliva
18:06 Re: RFC: Named warnings Alexandre Oliva
18:02 Re: RFC: Named warnings Richard Earnshaw
17:58 Re: RFC: Named warnings Joseph S. Myers
17:57 Re: RFC: Named warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
17:51 Re: RFC: Named warnings Falk Hueffner
17:47 Re: RFC: Named warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
17:43 Re: Build error - still there Alexandre Oliva
17:35 Re: RFC: Named warnings Joe Buck
17:35 Re: Gabriel Dos Reis will be RM for the 3.2.2 release Benjamin Kosnik
17:23 Re: RFC: Named warnings Mark Mitchell
17:21 Re: RFC: Named warnings Paolo Bonzini
17:16 Re: RFC: Named warnings Mark Mitchell
17:15 Re: RFC: Named warnings Mark Mitchell
16:34 Another mainline bootstrap problem Kai Henningsen
15:43 Re: Build error - still there Pedro Manuel Augusto
15:42 Re: RFC: Named warnings Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci
15:39 Re: [patch] Ada bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 Geert Bosch
15:30 Re: RFC: Named warnings Fergus Henderson
15:14 Re: RFC: Named warnings Michael S. Zick
15:09 Re: CVS is down? Phil Edwards
15:04 Re: RFC: Named warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
15:03 Re: RFC: Named warnings Michael S. Zick
14:44 Re: RFC: Named warnings Phil Edwards
14:43 Re: RFC: Named warnings Phil Edwards
14:38 Re: RFC: Named warnings Fergus Henderson
14:24 GCC port to TI C55x DSP ?? Samuel Ortiz
14:14 Problem building uberbaum for m68k-elf Peter Barada
13:11 Re: CVS is down? Gabriel Dos Reis
12:15 Re: RFC: Named warnings Robert Dewar
11:56 Re: RFC: Named warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
11:53 Re: RFC: Named warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
11:52 Re: RFC: Named warnings Robert Dewar
11:49 Re: RFC: Named warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
11:42 resend - [patch] Ada bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 Ritzert
11:35 Re: RFC: Named warnings Joseph S. Myers
11:34 [patch] Ada bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 Ritzert
11:33 Re: RFC: Named warnings Joseph S. Myers
11:28 Re: RFC: Named warnings Joseph S. Myers
11:15 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] Make all the manuals unambiguously DFSG free Kai Henningsen
11:15 Re: RFC: Named warnings Kai Henningsen
11:15 Re: RFC: Named warnings Kai Henningsen
11:15 Re: RFC: Named warnings Kai Henningsen
10:27 Re: RFC: Named warnings Theodore Papadopoulo
10:20 Re: CVS is down? Nathan Sidwell
09:21 Re: RFC: Named warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
09:10 Signal 11 Robert McNulty Junior
08:42 Re: Really weird (bogus?) regressions Paolo Carlini
08:32 new target Jan Beulich
08:21 Re: RFC: Named warnings Mark Mitchell
08:03 CVS is down? Josef Zlomek
07:43 Re: RFC: Named warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
07:39 Re: RFC: Named warnings Gabriel Dos Reis
07:32 Re: Questions about PIC code Richard Henderson
07:17 Re: Really weird (bogus?) regressions Richard Henderson
07:15 Re: RFC: Named warnings Neil Booth
06:48 A Simple Question =?GB2312?Q?=C0=EE=C5=F4?=
06:00 Re: FDLed manuals Nathanael Nerode
05:40 Re: FDLed manuals Robert Dewar
05:32 Re: Gabriel Dos Reis will be RM for the 3.2.2 release Mark Mitchell
05:24 Re: RFC: Named warnings Stan Shebs
05:15 Strange gcc specific warning Frank Klemm
04:51 Re: Unwinding on Sparc/Solaris: MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR Jeff Sturm
04:04 Re: RFC: Named warnings Phil Edwards
03:40 Re: RFC: Named warnings Matt Austern
02:34 Re: FDLed manuals Stan Shebs
02:26 Re: FDLed manuals DJ Delorie
02:20 Re: FDLed manuals Nathanael Nerode
02:09 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] Make all the manuals unambiguously DFSG free Joe Buck
02:01 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] Make all the manuals unambiguously DFSG free Joseph S. Myers
02:00 Re: RFC: Named warnings Stan Shebs
01:58 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] Make all the manuals unambiguously DFSG free Joe Buck
01:52 Re: FDLed manuals Joe Buck
01:42 Re: RFC: Named warnings Joseph S. Myers
01:41 Re: FDLed manuals Stan Shebs
01:27 Re: RFC: Named warnings Zack Weinberg
01:14 Re: FDLed manuals Nathanael Nerode
01:07 RFC: Named warnings Stan Shebs
00:58 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] Make all the manuals unambiguously DFSG free Richard Kenner
00:58 Re: Build error - still there Alexandre Oliva
00:44 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] Make all the manuals unambiguously DFSG free Zack Weinberg

January 23, 2003
23:40 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] Make all the manuals unambiguously DFSG free Joseph S. Myers
23:06 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] Make all the manuals unambiguously DFSG free Joe Buck
22:33 Re: Gabriel Dos Reis will be RM for the 3.2.2 release Gabriel Dos Reis
22:07 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] Make all the manuals unambiguously DFSG free Richard Kenner
20:40 Re: new tcl/tk imported into sources Graham Stott
20:18 Re: new tcl/tk imported into sources Andrew Cagney
20:13 Signed vs. unsigned pointer warnings Timo Sirainen
19:59 draft release notes for GCC 3.2.2, first attempt Joe Buck
19:56 Re: mainline bootstrap failure Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:23 Re: [3.3] Patch ping Ranjit Mathew
18:39 Re: new tcl/tk imported into sources Graham Stott
18:30 Re: Build error - still there Pedro Manuel Augusto
18:25 Re: Unwinding on Sparc/Solaris: MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR Daniel Jacobowitz
18:10 Re: Gabriel Dos Reis will be RM for the 3.2.2 release Joe Buck
18:08 Re: [3.3] Patch ping Ranjit Mathew
18:04 Unwinding on Sparc/Solaris: MD_FALLBACK_FRAME_STATE_FOR Geert Bosch
17:07 mainline bootstrap failure Kai Henningsen
17:01 Re: Picking one solution to the "struct cpp_reader" protos.h problem Stan Shebs
16:25 Re: Questions about PIC code Peter Barada
13:14 bootstrap failure on darwin, trunk AND branch Andreas Tobler
12:30 Re: ARM interrupts Richard Earnshaw
11:12 Re: ARM interrupts Richard Earnshaw
11:08 Re: problems with PIC, casesi patterns on m68k Andreas Schwab
10:37 Re: ARM interrupts Nick Clifton
07:07 Re: GCC-HEAD [3.4] PCH and multiple header support? Karel Gardas
06:39 Re: Picking one solution to the "struct cpp_reader" protos.h problem Neil Booth
04:48 Re: Gabriel Dos Reis will be RM for the 3.2.2 release Gabriel Dos Reis
02:49 Picking one solution to the "struct cpp_reader" protos.h problem Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:33 RE: segment fault stage 2 gcc-3.4 trunk. Robert McNulty Junior
02:24 Re: successfull built for gcc-2.95.2 Joe Buck
02:22 Re: help : SEGV in libstdc++-v3 in RedHat 8.0 Joe Buck
02:16 segment fault stage 2 gcc-3.4 trunk. Robert McNulty Junior
02:16 help : SEGV in libstdc++-v3 in RedHat 8.0 Arul Wilson
02:05 Re: Basic block construction on PA Richard Henderson
01:56 Re: rs6000 and ffs Richard Henderson
01:37 Re: 3.3 problem: <ctype.h> and <iostream> Craig Rodrigues
00:47 Re: 3.3 problem: <ctype.h> and <iostream> Matt Austern
00:34 3.3 problem: <ctype.h> and <iostream> Craig Rodrigues
00:27 Re: [3.3] Patch ping Geoff Keating

January 22, 2003
23:57 Basic block construction on PA John David Anglin
23:52 Re: PCH tests fail on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Kaveh R. Ghazi
23:15 Re: PATCH: frontends.html -- remove Ksi link Michal Moskal
23:13 Really weird (bogus?) regressions Germana Ricci
22:51 successfull built for gcc-2.95.2 Klaus Ziegler - Sun Profession
22:47 problems with PIC, casesi patterns on m68k Peter Barada
22:45 Re: GCC-HEAD [3.4] PCH and multiple header support? Oscar Fuentes
22:44 Re: Fix latent bug in c++ frontend Jason Merrill
21:58 Re: GCC-HEAD [3.4] PCH and multiple header support? Neil Booth
21:56 How to trigger ffsdi2? Falk Hueffner
21:44 Re: Again a new parser bug Mark Mitchell
21:28 Again a new parser bug Richard Guenther
21:07 Re: Speed regression from 3.2 to 3.3 Mark Mitchell
20:56 Re: Suggestion for ChangeLog patch change Tom Tromey
20:52 Re: GCC-HEAD [3.4] PCH and multiple header support? Joe Buck
20:48 Re: Suggestion for ChangeLog patch change John Levon
20:48 Re: Suggestion for ChangeLog patch change David Edelsohn
20:45 Suggestion for ChangeLog patch change Tom Tromey
20:31 GCC-HEAD [3.4] PCH and multiple header support? Shawn Starr
20:31 Re: [3.3] Patch ping Tom Tromey
20:16 Re: No download option Gerald Pfeifer
20:14 Really weird (bogus?) regressions Paolo Carlini
20:01 No download option Bryan Feng
19:30 Re: Speed regression from 3.2 to 3.3 Matt Austern
19:29 Re: Speed regression from 3.2 to 3.3 Matt Austern
19:27 Re: Speed regression from 3.2 to 3.3 Richard Guenther
19:23 Re: Speed regression from 3.2 to 3.3 Joe Buck
18:54 new tcl/tk imported into sources Martin M. Hunt
18:46 Re: g77 & RAM access Mike Stump
18:36 Re: [3.3] Patch ping Geoff Keating
18:22 [3.3] Patch ping Tom Tromey
18:12 Re: Building gcc 3.2.1 on Solaris 8/sparc with native cc Alexandre Oliva
18:03 Re: Speed regression from 3.2 to 3.3 Matt Austern
18:01 A GNU High Performance Computing Initiative? Scott Robert Ladd
17:55 Re: g77 & RAM access Toon Moene
17:42 Re: Speed regression from 3.2 to 3.3 Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci
17:06 Re: collapsing insns leading to a branch to a single branch-on-bit-equality insn Jim Wilson
16:12 Re: ARM interrupts Richard Earnshaw
16:02 Building gcc 3.2.1 on Solaris 8/sparc with native cc Hubert Feyrer
15:58 ARM interrupts Eric de Jong
13:43 PATCh for Re: Gabriel Dos Reis will be RM for the 3.2.2 release Gerald Pfeifer
11:30 Re: 3.2 bug or something really odd. Kazu Hirata
11:18 Re: 3.2 bug or something really odd. Dmitry
11:09 Re: 3.2 bug or something really odd. Kazu Hirata
11:08 Re: rs6000 and ffs Falk Hueffner
10:58 g77 & RAM access Anuchit Aromsawa
10:24 New parser does not warn/error correcly in -ansi mode? Richard Guenther
08:27 Re: snapshots Joseph S. Myers
07:42 3.2 bug or something really odd. Dmitry
06:05 RE: New targets to Binutils for H8 series D.Venkatasubramanian, Noida
03:52 RE: [H8300] : BCLR Instruction is not being generated for H8 target Arati Dikey
03:08 Re: snapshots Segher Boessenkool
00:12 gcc makefile problem Kwok Cheung

January 21, 2003
23:32 Re: Garbage collection Fergus Henderson
23:29 Re: Speed regression from 3.2 to 3.3 Matt Austern
23:24 Re: rs6000 and ffs Richard Henderson
23:12 Gabriel Dos Reis will be RM for the 3.2.2 release Joe Buck
20:40 Re: Generating HTML manual Ben Elliston
20:23 Re: rs6000 and ffs Falk Hueffner
19:41 Re: gcc-3.2.2 release plan Svein E. Seldal
19:15 Re: gcc-3.2.2 release plan Phil Edwards
19:10 Re: Generating HTML manual Phil Edwards
18:24 Generating HTML manual AWLaFramboise
18:16 gcc-3.2.2 release plan Benjamin Kosnik
17:58 Garbage collection Martin York
17:21 gcc memory reservation aton
16:08 Bug in df_ref_unlink? Christian Ehrhardt
16:08 Re: Another new-parser problem? (libstdc++) Richard Guenther
15:22 collapsing insns leading to a branch to a single branch-on-bit-equality insn Brendan Kehoe
14:57 Re: [H8300] : BCLR Instruction is not being generated for H8 target Kazu Hirata
13:35 Re: Another new-parser problem? (libstdc++) Richard Guenther
13:14 Re: Proposed patch for PR 7507 and PR 9289 Christian Ehrhardt
12:20 How to figure out whether function is nested from the type? Jan Hubicka
10:41 Error searching mailing list archive Andy Balaam
08:03 Re: Proposed patch for PR 7507 and PR 9289 Richard Henderson
07:57 Re: Speed regression from 3.2 to 3.3 Jan Hubicka
07:41 Re: patch that caused regression PR optimization/7154 Richard Henderson
07:13 Re: snapshots Joseph S. Myers
06:32 [H8300] : BCLR Instruction is not being generated for H8 target Arati Dikey
04:03 Re: s390/s390x TLS ABI. Ulrich Drepper
03:39 Re: AUTOMATON_STATE_ALTS not used, yet takes 60KB of insn-attrtab.c Joern Rennecke
01:30 snapshots Segher Boessenkool
01:29 Re: label value in ppc asm stmt Segher Boessenkool
01:29 Re: PCH tests fail on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Segher Boessenkool
00:05 Re: Speed regression from 3.2 to 3.3 Pop Sébastian

January 20, 2003
23:44 Speed regression from 3.2 to 3.3 Matt Austern
22:47 Re: call frame instruction encodings ? Richard Henderson
20:50 Re: Merging rtlopt-branch Jan Hubicka
20:33 Re: Merging rtlopt-branch Jan Hubicka
20:22 Re: AUTOMATON_STATE_ALTS not used, yet takes 60KB of insn-attrtab.c Zack Weinberg
19:38 Merging rtlopt-branch David Edelsohn
19:36 Re: AUTOMATON_STATE_ALTS not used, yet takes 60KB of insn-attrtab.c Vladimir Makarov
18:00 Re: label value in ppc asm stmt Geoff Keating
17:50 RE: Intel C++ compiler? Scott Robert Ladd
16:59 gcc-ss-20030120 is now available gccadmin
16:12 Re: Erreur crt1.o avec g++ Alexandre Oliva
15:42 Re: label value in ppc asm stmt David Edelsohn
14:57 Re: Erreur crt1.o avec g++ 3.2 Kris Warkentin
14:48 Unreviewed c++ patch - fix PR/9354 (high priority) Josef Zlomek
14:00 Re: rs6000 and ffs Michael S. Zick
13:51 s390/s390x TLS ABI. Martin Schwidefsky
11:41 Re: rs6000 and ffs Håkan Hjort
10:22 Example of the gcc internals described in rdf/ntriples via the gcc-introspector James Michael DuPont
07:11 Re: patch submission question, format existing code Ben Elliston
07:03 Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] gcc cvs HEAD patch Ben Elliston
06:39 label value in ppc asm stmt Johan Rydberg
06:21 Re: Remove EGCS symlink from CVS? Ben Elliston
04:42 Re: VA_OPEN unresolved error Zack Weinberg
04:23 VA_OPEN unresolved error Billy O'Connor
00:31 Re: New targets to Binutils for H8 series Kazu Hirata

January 19, 2003
23:57 Erreur crt1.o avec g++ 3.2 Bechir Bouzakher
23:41 AUTOMATON_STATE_ALTS not used, yet takes 60KB of insn-attrtab.c Zack Weinberg
23:39 Erreur crt1.o avec g++ Bechir Bouzakher
22:53 Re: Big trouble with CVS Paolo Carlini
22:34 Re: Remove EGCS symlink from CVS? Craig Rodrigues
22:15 Re: Remove EGCS symlink from CVS? Joseph S. Myers
21:41 Re: Remove EGCS symlink from CVS? Gerald Pfeifer
21:28 Using PCH while boostrapping the 3.4 compiler and building its language support libraries? Christian Jönsson
21:02 Re: PCH tests fail on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Geoff Keating
20:49 Re: How does virtual function dispatch work in gcc? Dennis Dams
20:01 Re: Some PCH tests fail on mips-irix6 Eric Christopher
19:45 Re: GNATS down? Toon Moene
19:41 Re: Preinstall thoughts Alexandre Oliva
19:16 Re: gengenrtl compile error Jean-Pierre Radley
18:53 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
17:51 Re: GNATS down? Jeff Sturm
17:37 Re: GNATS down? Christopher Faylor
17:31 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:34 Re: issues with inlining Diego Novillo
15:28 GNATS down? Jeff Sturm
15:26 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Phil Edwards
15:26 Re: Big trouble with CVS Phil Edwards
14:57 Re: issues with inlining Alexandre Oliva
14:49 Re: Some PCH tests fail on mips-irix6 Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:48 Re: Big trouble with CVS Alexandre Oliva
14:38 Re: PCH tests fail on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:15 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Robert Dewar
12:56 Big trouble with CVS Paolo Carlini
12:34 Re: Proposed patch for PR 7507 and PR 9289 Alexandre Oliva
11:38 patch submission question, format existing code Andreas Tobler
09:45 Re: error: nonnull argument with out-of-range operand number Joseph S. Myers
07:02 Chnese New year vacation notice william
05:18 Cross Compiling questions Dave Murphy
05:10 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Kai Henningsen
05:09 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Kai Henningsen

January 18, 2003
22:21 Successful build of 3.0.3 Alexander Klein
21:53 Re: GCC 3.4 parser bug? Paolo Carlini
21:13 error: nonnull argument with out-of-range operand number John Levon
20:29 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Zack Weinberg
17:57 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Fergus Henderson
17:32 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Neil Booth
17:32 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Fergus Henderson
17:26 GCC 3.4 parser bug? Craig Rodrigues
17:03 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Daniel Egger
17:03 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Daniel Egger
16:52 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Robert Dewar
16:48 Re: call frame instruction encodings ? Andrew Haley
16:46 Re: Is there a long double ieee-754 library source anywhere? Peter Barada
16:32 Re: call frame instruction encodings ? Andreas Tobler
16:26 Re: call frame instruction encodings ? David Edelsohn
16:17 call frame instruction encodings ? Andreas Tobler
14:19 Re: gcc 3.2.1 optimizer degradation (strlen, -O2) Leonid Pauzner
09:28 RE: List of possible clobber registers for x86 Tamas Nagy
09:19 Fwd: [Introspector-developers] gcc cvs HEAD patch James Michael DuPont
07:59 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Gabriel Dos Reis
07:56 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Gabriel Dos Reis
07:53 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Gabriel Dos Reis
07:51 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Gabriel Dos Reis
03:44 Re: Is there a long double ieee-754 library source anywhere? Daniel Jacobowitz
03:37 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Robert Dewar
03:35 GCC 3.4: ICE in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:1868 Craig Rodrigues
02:22 Is there a long double ieee-754 library source anywhere? Peter Barada
02:07 Re: Proposed patch for PR 7507 and PR 9289 Dale Johannesen
01:45 Re: Proposed patch for PR 7507 and PR 9289 Christian Ehrhardt
00:49 You Have To See This... Someone
00:33 Re: Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar

January 17, 2003
23:26 Re: Configure magic Steven Bosscher
23:18 Re: Configure magic Zack Weinberg
22:56 Configure magic Steven Bosscher
21:00 Re: About a new gcc feature. I hope you read this e-mail Fergus Henderson
20:50 Remove EGCS symlink from CVS? Craig Rodrigues
20:03 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-01-17 Diego Novillo
19:46 gcc and itanium Mehdi Khaldi
19:15 Re: How does virtual function dispatch work in gcc? Joe Buck
19:09 ICE/miscompilation of 24_iterators/iterator.cc Paolo Carlini
18:40 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Stan Shebs
18:32 Re: Proposed patch for PR 7507 and PR 9289 Dale Johannesen
18:19 Proposed patch for PR 7507 and PR 9289 Christian Ehrhardt
18:14 How does virtual function dispatch work in gcc? Dennis Dams
17:37 testing for a trivial constructor? Phil Edwards
17:28 Re: Another new-parser problem? (libstdc++) Mark Mitchell
16:26 [tree-ssa-branch] Building on i686-pc-cygwin Tobias Schlüter
16:17 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work DJ Delorie
16:15 Re: Another new-parser problem? (libstdc++) Richard Guenther
15:32 Re: Another new-parser problem? (libstdc++) Phil Edwards
14:22 Re: About a new gcc feature. I hope you read this e-mail Diego Novillo
13:01 List of possible clobber registers for x86 Andrew Haley
12:27 List of possible clobber registers for x86 Tamas Nagy
11:36 Re: [3.2 branch] bootstrap failure on m68k-linux between 20021231 and 20030109 Eric Botcazou
11:05 [3.2 branch] bootstrap failure on m68k-linux between 20021231 and 20030109 Matthias Klose
10:26 Another new-parser problem? (libstdc++) Richard Guenther
10:06 Re: Ice on stage 2 (again) Christian Jönsson
09:10 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Daniel Berlin
08:36 Re: I mix the compilers in my computer Gerald Pfeifer
08:12 Request to mailing list balsa-list rejected balsa-list-admin
08:12 About a new gcc feature. I hope you read this e-mail lucas75it@tiscali.it
06:57 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Neil Booth
05:31 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Ben Elliston
05:26 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Tony Finch
05:12 I mix the compilers in my computer Jose Sanchez
05:12 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Stan Shebs
04:36 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Gareth Pearce
04:07 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Phil Edwards
04:00 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Phil Edwards
03:52 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Fergus Henderson
03:35 about cpp version for gcc-3.0.4 Gavin Lu
03:23 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Gareth Pearce
01:46 Bootstrap failure on main for hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 John David Anglin
01:26 Re: ICE on stage 2 Kelley Cook
01:22 Re: Boostrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 Gerald Pfeifer
00:58 Re: Boostrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 Benjamin Kosnik
00:26 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Kurt Wall
00:11 Re: Boostrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 Jeffrey Oldham

January 16, 2003
23:47 Boostrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd4.7 Gerald Pfeifer
23:41 Ice on stage 2 (again) Robert McNulty Junior
23:36 Re: df_analyse doesn't work after reload devik
23:33 gcc.gnu.org downtime 2003-01-18 (Saturday) Gerald Pfeifer
23:04 Re: patch that FIXED regression PR opt/7247 (still broken in 3.2 branch) Craig Rodrigues
22:33 RE: ICE on stage 2 Robert McNulty Junior
22:12 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Daniel Egger
22:02 Re: ICE on stage 2 Kelley Cook
21:43 Re: [optimization/6059] -fvolatile-*: fix or kill? Graham Stott
21:03 Re: Fix latent bug in c++ frontend Josef Zlomek
20:22 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Toon Moene
20:15 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Mark Mitchell
20:13 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Mark Mitchell
20:06 Re: Compiling some files with -Werror? Diego Novillo
20:03 patch that caused regression PR c++/9342 Janis Johnson
20:00 Re: Compiling some files with -Werror? Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:57 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Janis Johnson
19:53 Re: [wwwdocs] segfault.html (was Synthetic register related: Seg fault) - segfault.html [1/1] Janis Johnson
19:37 Re: warning when bool parameter in function prototype Joseph S. Myers
19:35 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Neil Booth
19:33 Re: warning when bool parameter in function prototype Neil Booth
19:28 Re: [wwwdocs] segfault.html (was Synthetic register related: Segfault) - segfault.html [1/1] Joseph S. Myers
19:18 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Joseph S. Myers
19:11 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Phil Edwards
18:57 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Theodore Papadopoulo
18:29 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Andrew Haley
18:27 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Andrew Haley
18:25 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Marc Espie
18:20 Re: [wwwdocs] segfault.html (was Synthetic register related: Seg fault) - segfault.html [1/1] Janis Johnson
18:18 Fix latent bug in c++ frontend Josef Zlomek
18:16 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Joel Sherrill
18:15 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation law
18:14 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Gabriel Dos Reis
18:12 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation law
18:12 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Gabriel Dos Reis
18:05 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Daniel Berlin
18:04 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Diego Novillo
18:03 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Theodore Papadopoulo
17:51 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation law
17:38 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Mark Mitchell
17:34 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Diego Novillo
17:20 Re: patch that FIXED regression PR opt/7247 (still broken in 3.2 branch) Joe Buck
17:18 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation law
17:08 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Gareth Pearce
16:59 Re: warning when bool parameter in function prototype Alexandre Oliva
16:46 [wwwdocs] segfault.html (was Synthetic register related: Seg fault) - segfault.html [1/1] Kelley Cook
16:43 Re: Support for DDWARF-2 debug info? (on Cygwin) Brian Ford
16:02 Re: warning when bool parameter in function prototype Fergus Henderson
16:00 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Joe Buck
15:55 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Joe Buck
15:33 [on leave] Re: Congratulations Paige Parsons
15:31 Re: SSE2 support in GCC-3.2.1 (May not exist?) Jan Hubicka
15:31 Compiling some files with -Werror? Diego Novillo
15:31 Re: warning when bool parameter in function prototype Jan Hubicka
15:06 df_analyse doesn't work after reload devik
14:57 Re: warning when bool parameter in function prototype Josef Zlomek
14:48 Re: warning when bool parameter in function prototype Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:11 RE: SSE2 support in GCC-3.2.1 (May not exist?) Scott Robert Ladd
13:40 SSE2 support in GCC-3.2.1 Pramod Kumar Swami
13:37 [optimization/6059] -fvolatile-*: fix or kill? Richard Sandiford
13:36 Re: tree-ssa Diego Novillo
13:31 Re: tree-ssa Lars Segerlund
12:49 Re: tree-ssa Diego Novillo
12:34 tree-ssa Lars Segerlund
11:53 mdkgroup.com mailer
11:49 Re: warning when bool parameter in function prototype Josef Zlomek
11:33 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Robert Dewar
11:03 Re: Error in http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html Gerald Pfeifer
10:53 i386 ELF PIC PLT optimization ? Fabrice Bellard
10:47 Re: Another picky-new-parser problem Richard Guenther
09:04 warning when bool parameter in function prototype Josef Zlomek

January 15, 2003
23:48 Re: optimizations Reza Roboubi
23:20 Re: optimizations Paolo Bonzini
23:04 [fmII] GCC Introspector calling for testing of alpha 0.4 mdupont 666+111atyahoodotcom
22:09 RTTI bug Stefan Seefeld
21:52 Re: optimizations tm_gccmail
20:14 Re: optimizations Reza Roboubi
20:01 Re: Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Phil Edwards
19:54 Re: target/9150: [3.4 regression] ICE in recog.c:2177 using -march=pentium3and -fPIC Andrew Pollard
19:46 Thoughts on doxygen for internal documentation Diego Novillo
18:43 Re: optimizations Bonzini
17:46 Fixinclude help for QNX port Graeme Peterson
17:37 regression PR tests with intermittent results; time for valgrind? Janis Johnson
17:07 patch that caused regression PR c/8602 Janis Johnson
09:35 Re: Some problems during unzip manula documentation Alexandre Oliva
08:54 Re: Synthetic register related: Seg fault Lars Segerlund
08:51 Some problems during unzip manula documentation Lanza Piergiorgio
08:49 Re: Synthetic register related: Seg fault Fergus Henderson
07:37 Synthetic register related: Seg fault Andy Walker
06:31 Re: optimizations Reza Roboubi
05:10 Re: optimizations Andrew Pinski
04:33 Re: basic-gcc_3.2 gcc_2.95.3-branch fail on Alpha configure problem Alexandre Oliva
04:00 Re: are regression hunts worthwhile for very old C++ regressions? Mark Mitchell
03:24 Re: Adding a RID_* breaks C parser, why? Phil Edwards
03:23 Adding a RID_* breaks C parser, why? Phil Edwards
02:36 Re: patch that caused regression PR f/9258 Richard Henderson
02:30 Re: patch that FIXED regression PR opt/7247 (still broken in 3.2 branch) David Edelsohn
00:52 Re: optimizations Reza Roboubi
00:15 Re: optimizations Reza Roboubi

January 14, 2003
23:45 patch that FIXED regression PR c++/9183 (still broken in 3.2 branch) Janis Johnson
22:58 patch that FIXED regression PR opt/7247 (still broken in 3.2 branch) Janis Johnson
22:08 Re: Fwd: Vshield ghost virus David Edelsohn
22:05 Fwd: Vshield ghost virus Paulo S P Silveira
22:04 Re: ICE on stage 2 Kelley Cook
21:55 Vshield ghost virus Paulo S P Silveira
21:13 Re: Question about POST_MODIFY by register address mode David Edelsohn
20:59 Re: optimizations Andrew Pinski
20:43 basic-gcc_3.2 gcc_2.95.3-branch fail on Alpha configure problem bemis
20:38 optimizations Reza Roboubi
20:15 Building gcc 3.2.1 under Solaris 8 problems Eurico de Sousa
20:05 Re: patch that caused regression PR f/9258 Jan Hubicka
19:52 Re: are regression hunts worthwhile for very old C++ regressions? Geoff Keating
19:21 are regression hunts worthwhile for very old C++ regressions? Janis Johnson
18:10 Re: patch that caused regression PR f/9258 Jan Hubicka
17:52 patch that caused regression PR f/9258 Janis Johnson
16:43 Error in http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html Scott Dodson
16:30 Re: PCH tests fail on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 David Edelsohn
16:26 degenerate optimization case Kris Warkentin
15:11 Re: PCH tests fail on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 David Edelsohn
15:05 Re: status of the tree-ssa branch ? Diego Novillo
14:52 Question about POST_MODIFY by register address mode Raimonds Cicans
14:33 Re: PCH tests fail on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Richard Earnshaw
14:31 Re: Templated friends? Volker Reichelt
12:05 Re: [gcc 3.3] Release date typo... Gerald Pfeifer
11:17 Re: ICE on stage 2 Christian Jönsson
11:14 Templated friends? Richard Guenther
10:49 [gcc 3.3] Release date typo... Daniel Blueman
08:08 bootstrapping gcc trunk on sparc64-linux: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false Christian Jönsson
07:35 10/100 MBps 32-Bit PCI-Bus Ethernet PCI AdapteR(LAN CARD) william
07:33 Re: Re: c++ "with" keyword Fergus Henderson
07:19 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Jeff Donner
06:20 Re: new fails on gcc 3.4, i686-unknown-openbsd3.1 Mark Mitchell
03:38 NAV detected a virus in a document you authored. Office/REK/Hugvit
02:43 gcc-ss-20030113 is now available gccadmin
02:16 Re: C/C++ testsuite uniqness tm_gccmail
02:03 Re: C/C++ testsuite uniqness Mike Stump
01:50 Re: new parser: error recovery needs work Mark Mitchell
01:31 Re: C/C++ testsuite uniqness Gabriel Dos Reis
01:24 Re: C/C++ testsuite uniqness Mike Stump
01:00 Re: C/C++ testsuite uniqness Mike Stump
00:53 Re: C/C++ testsuite uniqness Benjamin Kosnik
00:49 Re: C/C++ testsuite uniqness tm_gccmail
00:38 Re: Some PCH tests fail on mips-irix6 Geoff Keating
00:34 Re: PCH tests fail on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Geoff Keating
00:28 Re: C/C++ testsuite uniqness Zack Weinberg
00:17 C/C++ testsuite uniqness Mike Stump

January 13, 2003
23:46 new parser: error recovery needs work Joe Buck
23:08 Re: Development plan typo Gerald Pfeifer
21:41 genoutput copyright dates? Joern Rennecke
21:28 Re: Another picky-new-parser problem Mark Mitchell
21:28 Some PCH tests fail on mips-irix6 Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:17 PCH tests fail on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:05 Re: RFD: constraint letter suffixes Joern Rennecke
21:03 Re: Extra RTTI flags in G++ Mark Mitchell
20:54 Parser (?) problem building lyx-1.2.2 with gcc 3.4 on PA John David Anglin
20:21 Development plan typo Paul G Quinn
18:07 gcc trunk testsuite run for sparc64-linux: warning: ld-linux.so.2 not found Christian Jönsson
17:49 Re: RFD: constraint letter suffixes Ulrich Weigand
17:26 Re: Reducing large testcases Janis Johnson
17:11 Re: Reducing large testcases Alexandre Oliva
17:09 Re: IMP:GNU extensions on gcc 3.2 Alexandre Oliva
16:32 Re: Compiler Info Request Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci
16:21 Re: Another picky-new-parser problem Mark Mitchell
15:31 Re: [Ada] How suppress code generation of inlined operations Robert Dewar
14:24 Compiler Info Request Hentie Pauley
14:22 Another picky-new-parser problem Richard Guenther
14:19 Re: New parser overly picky? Paolo Carlini
14:18 Re: New parser overly picky? Volker Reichelt
14:17 status of the tree-ssa branch ? Lars Segerlund
14:07 New parser overly picky? Richard Guenther
10:24 Reducing large testcases Richard Guenther
10:05 IMP:GNU extensions on gcc 3.2 Sayali Surve
10:04 Re: GNATS down/broken? Christian Ehrhardt
09:02 [Ada] How suppress code generation of inlined operations rolf.ebert.gcc
07:31 Re: [RFC] Update to current automake/autoconf/libtool versions(take 2) Zack Weinberg
06:24 C++ PATCH Re: Problems compiling KDE programs with GCC 3.3+ Jason Merrill
03:32 Re: [RFC] Update to current automake/autoconf/libtool versions (take 2) Klee Dienes
02:53 Re: GNATS down/broken? Christopher Faylor
01:39 Re: How can I force an optimization level for a single file in a project? Robert Dewar
00:07 32 bit system calls for solaris Per Fransson

January 12, 2003
21:00 Re: PowerPC - user variables referring to CRs Zack Weinberg
20:54 Re: Problems compiling KDE programs with GCC 3.3+ Andreas Jaeger
20:34 Re: PowerPC - user variables referring to CRs David Edelsohn
20:20 PowerPC - user variables referring to CRs Zack Weinberg
19:35 GNATS down/broken? Andreas Jaeger
18:18 Re: Problems compiling KDE programs with GCC 3.3+ Gabriel Dos Reis
17:51 Problems compiling KDE programs with GCC 3.3+ Andreas Jaeger
17:14 Re: [RFC] Update to current automake/autoconf/libtool versions(take 2) Zack Weinberg
16:14 Re: [RFC] Update to current automake/autoconf/libtool versions (take2) Nathanael Nerode
13:22 Re: [RFC] Update to current automake/autoconf/libtool versions. Alexandre Oliva
12:43 Manchester United Statistics Stretford End Team
12:42 Manchester United Statistics Stretford End Team
10:32 [RFC] Update to current automake/autoconf/libtool versions (take 2) Klee Dienes
05:51 Re: website mailing lists not updating Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:46 Save 50% on your printer cartridges Steve
02:21 Re: website mailing lists not updating Phil Edwards

January 11, 2003
22:57 Re: gcc 3.2.1 optimizer degradation (strlen, -O2) Charles Sandmann
22:33 Re: gcc 3.2.1 optimizer degradation (strlen, -O2) Marcel Cox
20:08 Re: gcc 3.2.1 optimizer degradation (strlen, -O2) Leonid Pauzner
18:32 Re: PCH merge bootstrap failure on irix6.2 due to missing ftello/fseeko Geoff Keating
18:20 Re: gcc 3.2.1 optimizer degradation (strlen, -O2) Marcel Cox
17:58 Re: gcc 3.2.1 optimizer degradation (strlen, -O2) Leonid Pauzner
17:00 ICE from failing to purge an addressof (PR/9090) Richard Earnshaw
16:45 website mailing lists not updating Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:41 Re: PCH merge bootstrap failure on irix6.2 due to missing ftello/fseeko Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:01 Re: gcc 3.2.1 optimizer degradation (strlen, -O2) Eli Zaretskii
13:27 Re: Extra RTTI flags in G++ Nathan Sidwell
12:58 gcc 3.2.1 optimizer degradation (strlen, -O2) Leonid Pauzner
06:11 Re: PCH merge bootstrap failure on irix6.2 due to missing ftello/fseeko Geoff Keating
05:19 PCH merge bootstrap failure on irix6.2 due to missing ftello/fseeko Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:36 New C++ parser crashing Craig Rodrigues
03:21 Re: Mailing list archives busted! Kelley Cook
02:11 ICE on stage 2 Bobby McNulty Junior
01:09 web page http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-01/ not updated Matthias Klose
00:10 Re: A change to MUST_PASS_IN_STACK Alan Modra

January 10, 2003
23:57 Mailing list archives busted! Nathanael Nerode
23:24 Re: PCH failures Geoffrey Keating
23:09 Re: PCH merge complete Gerald Pfeifer
22:55 PCH failures Mark Mitchell
22:46 Re: questions regarding m68k/ColdFire dynamic/shared code Peter Barada
22:32 Re: How can I force an optimization level for a single file in a project? Neil Booth
19:53 Extra RTTI flags in G++ Mark Mitchell
19:38 Re: libffi and powerpc sys V struct passing problem Geoff Keating
18:49 Re: Merging PCH to mainline Geoffrey Keating
18:42 Re: Questions regarding m68k dynamic/shared code Ian Lance Taylor
18:24 libffi and powerpc sys V struct passing problem Andreas Tobler
18:23 Re: gcc mailing list archive stuck? Phil Edwards
18:23 Re: Repeat Request for a New Target Macro for the Java Front-End Tom Tromey
18:22 Re: How can I force an optimization level for a single file in aproject? Zack Weinberg
18:21 Re: Archive for gcc@gcc.gnu.org is stuck Zack Weinberg
18:10 Re: Archive for gcc@gcc.gnu.org is stuck Jakub Jelinek
18:09 Re: How can I force an optimization level for a single file in aproject? Stan Shebs
18:05 Re: Merging PCH to mainline Geoff Keating
18:04 Archive for gcc@gcc.gnu.org is stuck John David Anglin
17:53 Re: How can I force an optimization level for a single file in aproject? Zack Weinberg
17:47 gcc mailing list archive stuck? Jonathan Lennox
17:34 Re: builtin-constant.c test failure? Diego Novillo
17:26 Re: Problem with new port Alleged Judas
17:22 oh no - not anonymous namespaces again ... Gianni Mariani
17:02 builtin-constant.c test failure? Nathanael Nerode
16:06 Re: A change to MUST_PASS_IN_STACK David Edelsohn
15:44 Re: Merging PCH to mainline David Edelsohn
15:33 How can I force an optimization level for a single file in a project? Serge Manigault
13:11 gcc 3.2.1 build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 Richard Jackson
12:18 RE: New targets to Binutils for H8 series Andrew Volkov
12:13 Repeat Request for a New Target Macro for the Java Front-End Ranjit Mathew
10:25 Re: Merging PCH to mainline Gareth Pearce
10:12 Re: non-POD error Nathan Sidwell
10:08 Re: [Fwd: non-POD error] Gabriel Dos Reis
10:00 Re: Generating assembly for modulo scheduled loop for Itanium Deepak B. Nayak
09:49 Re: Generating assembly for modulo scheduled loop for Itanium (fwd) Prof.Y.N.Srikant
09:20 A change to MUST_PASS_IN_STACK Alan Modra
08:07 Re: Re: ANSIfy cp/parser.c John David Anglin
07:45 Re: Merging PCH to mainline Andi Kleen
07:28 Re: Merging PCH to mainline Mark Mitchell
07:23 [3.3] bootstrap error using bison-1.875 building objc-parse-c Matthias Klose
07:22 Akut---2:a Hands Lägenhet Sökes i Stockholm---Belöning. ed
06:17 Re: Should _SB_CTYPE_MACROS be defined on HP-UX 10.20 John David Anglin
05:12 Re: why non-PIC code in /usr/lib/libgcj.so.3.0.0? Alan Modra
05:11 RE: New targets to Binutils for H8 series D.Venkatasubramanian, Noida
04:06 invalid offsetof from non-POD type Chris Croswhite
03:51 Re: why non-PIC code in /usr/lib/libgcj.so.3.0.0? Jack Howarth
03:27 Re: why non-PIC code in /usr/lib/libgcj.so.3.0.0? Alan Modra
02:45 why non-PIC code in /usr/lib/libgcj.so.3.0.0? Jack Howarth
02:29 Re: call tree nodes Zack Weinberg
02:24 PCH merge complete Geoffrey Keating
02:18 [Fwd: non-POD error] Chris Croswhite
02:06 non-POD error Chris Croswhite
01:37 call tree nodes Per Fransson
01:18 single precision on sparc/slowlaris Chris Croswhite
01:14 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Richard Henderson
00:41 Re: Blitz, Boost, FTensor failures with new C++ parser Janis Johnson
00:15 Re: Questions regarding m68k dynamic/shared code Andreas Schwab
00:15 Re: Questions regarding m68k dynamic/shared code Andreas Schwab

January 09, 2003
23:59 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
23:54 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
23:24 Re: Single precision tm_gccmail
23:18 Re: Single precision Geoff Keating
22:56 Re: issues with inlining Carlo Wood
22:52 Re: Blitz, Boost, FTensor failures with new C++ parser Walter Landry
22:46 Re: Questions regarding m68k dynamic/shared code Richard Henderson
22:25 Re: New targets to Binutils for H8 series Kazu Hirata
22:17 Re: Single precision Chris Croswhite
22:11 Re: Single precision tm_gccmail
22:03 Re: Single precision Peter Barada
21:50 Re: issues with inlining Michel LESPINASSE
21:50 Merging PCH to mainline Geoffrey Keating
21:40 Re: Generating assembly for modulo scheduled loop for Itanium David Edelsohn
21:22 Re: Single precision tm_gccmail
21:14 Re: Not enough room for program headers Alexandre Oliva
21:12 Generating assembly for modulo scheduled loop for Itanium Deepak B. Nayak
21:09 Single precision Chris Croswhite
19:46 Re: issues with inlining Andrew Haley
19:39 Re: issues with inlining Michel LESPINASSE
18:51 Re: Support for DDWARF-2 debug info? (on Cygwin) Brian Ford
18:37 Re: Blitz, Boost, FTensor failures with new C++ parser Janis Johnson
17:54 Re: [PATCH] Fix g++.dg/tls failures on IA-64 David Edelsohn
17:43 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog config/i386/athlon.md config ... Jan Hubicka
17:29 Not enough room for program headers Aiqun Du
17:14 RE: New targets to Binutils for H8 series Andrew Volkov
16:40 Re: Questions regarding m68k dynamic/shared code Peter Barada
16:38 Re: gcc/gcc ChangeLog config/i386/athlon.md config ... Tom Tromey
16:36 Re: Questions regarding m68k dynamic/shared code Peter Barada
16:32 Xupiter Help Desk help
15:53 gcc-cvs mailing-list oddity Eric Botcazou
14:34 Re: SIZE_TYPE predefine not following CPU flags on embedded mips Joel Sherrill
14:30 Re: Embedded targets problem Joel Sherrill
14:20 Re: Embedded targets problem Joel Sherrill
13:58 Re: Embedded targets problem Dmitry
13:53 Re: Embedded targets problem Joel Sherrill
13:48 Xupiter Help Desk help
13:40 Re: New parser and reduction in number of C++ bugs Gerald Pfeifer
13:16 Re: New targets to Binutils for H8 series Kazu Hirata
13:05 Re: Questions regarding m68k dynamic/shared code Andreas Schwab
13:02 Re: Questions regarding m68k dynamic/shared code Andreas Schwab
10:37 C++/9167, middle-end/8917, optimization/8913, C/8407 Richard Guenther
10:25 New C++ Parser error? Richard Guenther
09:51 Re: Blitz, Boost, FTensor failures with new C++ parser Theodore Papadopoulo
09:38 Re: I am NOT a C programmer, but I need gcc Alex Hornby
09:29 Re: New parser and reduction in number of C++ bugs Gerald Pfeifer
08:22 Re: Embedded targets problem Dmitry
07:27 GCC 3.2.1 Core Tar Bzip2 ball MD5SUM mismatch Gene Cumm
04:38 Re: anonymous namespaces and possible linker trouble Gianni Mariani
04:29 Re: New parser and reduction in number of C++ bugs Zack Weinberg
04:21 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
03:48 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
03:44 Re: GCC and the Translation Project Ben Elliston
03:39 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
02:23 Solid Rack Solutions Rackmountpro.com
02:12 I am NOT a C programmer, but I need gcc Smith, Ralph N
02:06 Re: SIZE_TYPE predefine not following CPU flags on embedded mips Eric Christopher
01:28 Re: New parser and reduction in number of C++ bugs Mark Mitchell
00:48 Should _SB_CTYPE_MACROS be defined on HP-UX 10.20 Albert Chin
00:24 Re: anonymous namespaces and possible linker trouble Joe Buck
00:00 GCC and the Translation Project Joseph S. Myers

January 08, 2003
23:44 Re: Bootstrap compare failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu ?!? Jan Hubicka
23:13 Re: SIZE_TYPE predefine not following CPU flags on embedded mips Joel Sherrill
22:51 Re: compiling glibc-2.3.1 with gcc-3.2.1 for pentium >= II Rene Rebe
22:46 Re: speeding up parts of gcc by using ffs Richard Henderson
22:41 New parser and reduction in number of C++ bugs Wolfgang Bangerth
22:41 Re: compiling glibc-2.3.1 with gcc-3.2.1 for pentium >= II Richard Henderson
22:36 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Richard Henderson
22:29 Re: SIZE_TYPE predefine not following CPU flags on embedded mips Eric Christopher
22:19 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Zack Weinberg
22:16 Re: Blitz, Boost, FTensor failures with new C++ parser Gabriel Dos Reis
22:15 Re: Bootstrap compare failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu ?!? Jan Hubicka
22:09 Re: SIZE_TYPE predefine not following CPU flags on embedded mips Joel Sherrill
22:08 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Richard Henderson
22:05 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Richard Henderson
22:05 Blitz, Boost, FTensor failures with new C++ parser Janis Johnson
22:01 Re: Bootstrap compare failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu ?!? Nathanael Nerode
21:34 Re: SIZE_TYPE predefine not following CPU flags on embedded mips Eric Christopher
20:44 Bootstrap compare failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu ?!? Nathanael Nerode
20:29 Re: compiling glibc-2.3.1 with gcc-3.2.1 for pentium >= II Joe Buck
20:26 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers tm_gccmail
20:10 Re: SIZE_TYPE predefine not following CPU flags on embedded mips Neil Booth
19:59 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Michael S. Zick
19:45 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers tm_gccmail
19:29 Re: ggc_mark_rtx and gcc_mark_tree Geoffrey Keating
19:18 updates to 3.2 build status list Janis Johnson
19:04 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Michael S. Zick
18:36 Re: Questions regarding m68k dynamic/shared code Randy.Dunlap
18:22 Re: Questions regarding m68k dynamic/shared code Ian Lance Taylor
18:16 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Michael S. Zick
18:04 Questions regarding m68k dynamic/shared code Peter Barada
17:36 Re: compiling glibc-2.3.1 with gcc-3.2.1 for pentium >= II Alexandre Oliva
17:32 Re: compiling glibc-2.3.1 with gcc-3.2.1 for pentium >= II Joe Buck
17:29 Re: failure notice Joe Buck
17:20 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
17:15 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Alexandre Oliva
16:56 SIZE_TYPE predefine not following CPU flags on embedded mips Joel Sherrill
16:53 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Tom Lord
16:49 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Marcel Cox
16:28 Re: UEGENT: for Help! Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci
16:15 Re: Embedded targets problem Joel Sherrill
16:06 UEGENT: for Help! Aiqun Du
14:41 Embedded targets problem Dmitry
14:24 Re: failure notice Michael S. Zick
12:44 ggc_mark_rtx and gcc_mark_tree Josef Zlomek
12:27 Re: failure notice Falk Hueffner
12:21 Re: [pch-branch] missing binary operator issue. Karel Gardas
12:18 Re: failure notice Richard Earnshaw
12:14 Re: failure notice Christian Ehrhardt
12:13 Re: failure notice Nathanael Nerode
11:45 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Robert Dewar
11:32 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Lars Segerlund
11:26 failure notice Andrew Haley
11:21 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Michael S. Zick
11:20 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Robert Dewar
10:05 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Marcel Cox
09:51 Re: problem/bug with include directory order Christian Ehrhardt
08:46 Re: speeding up parts of gcc by using ffs Falk Hueffner
08:32 Re: speeding up parts of gcc by using ffs Andrew Pinski
08:22 Re: speeding up parts of gcc by using ffs Falk Hueffner
07:52 Re: speeding up parts of gcc by using ffs Andrew Pinski
06:56 Re: Question?? Gianni Mariani
06:08 Question?? Atul Jawale
05:36 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Andy Walker
05:27 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Andy Walker
05:04 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Andy Walker
02:59 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Robert Dewar
01:49 Re: compiling glibc-2.3.1 with gcc-3.2.1 for pentium >= II Rene Rebe
01:22 Re: anonymous namespaces and possible linker trouble Gianni Mariani
01:05 compiling glibc-2.3.1 with gcc-3.2.1 for pentium >= II Rene Rebe
00:34 Re: bumping libstdc++ version number on 3.3 branch and HEAD? Matthias Klose
00:32 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers tm_gccmail

January 07, 2003
23:43 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers tm_gccmail
23:28 Re: register allocation vs. scheduling and other stuff Mike Stump
23:26 Re: register allocation vs. scheduling and other stuff tm_gccmail
23:22 Re: CVS dead? Andrew Pinski
23:22 Re: CVS dead? Eric Christopher
23:18 Re: register allocation vs. scheduling and other stuff tm
23:16 Re: CVS dead? Eric Christopher
23:04 CVS dead? Andrew Pinski
22:57 Re: register allocation vs. scheduling and other stuff Florian Weimer
22:53 Re: fork() doesn't forks a new process. Joe Buck
22:40 Re: register allocation vs. scheduling and other stuff tm
22:16 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Richard Henderson
22:05 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers tm_gccmail
21:55 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Richard Henderson
21:55 Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith) Richard Henderson
21:54 Re: problem/bug with include directory order Daniel Jacobowitz
21:49 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Marcel Cox
21:44 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==
21:01 Re: RFD: constraint letter suffixes Joern Rennecke
20:41 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Marcel Cox
20:40 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria? Janis Johnson
20:39 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Marcel Cox
20:17 Re: register allocation vs. scheduling and other stuff Robert Dewar
20:11 Re: register allocation vs. scheduling and other stuff Robert Dewar
20:08 Re: bumping libstdc++ version number on 3.3 branch and HEAD? Benjamin Kosnik
19:53 Re: RCSP and modulo scheduling Vladimir N. Makarov
19:40 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria? Craig Rodrigues
19:33 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria? Janis Johnson
19:32 Re: register allocation vs. scheduling and other stuff tm_gccmail
19:22 Re: frontend Ziemowit Laski
19:21 Re: RCSP and modulo scheduling Jim Wilson
19:20 Re: [pch-branch] missing binary operator issue. Geoff Keating
19:03 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria? Craig Rodrigues
19:02 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria? Matt Austern
18:23 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers tm_gccmail
18:07 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers tm_gccmail
17:41 Start over with a cash grant vb-mailer
17:29 Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria? Janis Johnson
17:29 problem/bug with include directory order Christian Ehrhardt
17:19 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Janis Johnson
17:02 GCC 3.3 release criteria? Craig Rodrigues
16:37 Re: Problem with new port Joern Rennecke
16:29 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Robert Dewar
16:23 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Michael S. Zick
15:17 RTL generation ?? gyanindra mishra
15:14 Re: Generated unique labels Joern Rennecke
15:02 fork() doesn't forks a new process. Carles Xavier Munyoz =?utf-8?q
12:47 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Robert Dewar
12:32 Re: Help with GCC Gerald Pfeifer
12:10 Xupiter Help Desk help
12:10 Re: register allocation vs. scheduling and other stuff Robert Dewar
12:08 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Robert Dewar
12:06 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Momchil Velikov
11:51 Re: Problem with new port Dan Towner
11:51 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Robert Dewar
11:38 Re: Problem with putenv() in global constructor Alexandre Oliva
11:36 Re: Compiling error Alexandre Oliva
10:46 Help with GCC Andrew Luande
10:13 Re: Build error Pedro Manuel Augusto
09:49 Compiling error Andrew Luande
09:46 frontend Michal Nowikowski
09:18 Problem with putenv() in global constructor Gregory Shpitalnik
08:38 Xupiter Help Desk help
06:53 Re: anonymous namespaces and possible linker trouble Gianni Mariani
06:47 Re: register allocation vs. scheduling and other stuff Daniel Berlin
06:15 Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc cvs trunk (3.3) on sparc64-{solaris*,linux} Robert Schiele
06:04 Re: Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question. Andy Walker
06:02 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Andy Walker
05:29 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Andy Walker
05:20 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Andy Walker
05:08 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Andy Walker
03:42 Re: register allocation vs. scheduling and other stuff tm
03:13 Re: register allocation vs. scheduling and other stuff Robert Dewar
03:11 Re: Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question. Robert Dewar
02:34 gcc-ss-20030106 is now available gccadmin
01:35 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Diego Novillo
01:34 Re: problem with -ax option Satyavathi Malladi
01:33 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Richard Henderson
01:31 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Richard Henderson
01:27 problem with -ax option in gcc-2.95 Satyavathi Malladi
00:48 Re: register allocation vs. scheduling and other stuff tm_gccmail
00:18 Re: current version of ELF format Mike Stump
00:10 Re: register allocation vs. scheduling and other stuff Brad Lucier

January 06, 2003
23:54 Re: RCSP and modulo scheduling Vladimir Makarov
23:52 Re: Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question. Mike Stump
23:49 Re: register allocation vs. scheduling and other stuff tm
23:20 Re: problem with -ax option Janis Johnson
23:10 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Neil Booth
23:09 RCSP and modulo scheduling David Edelsohn
23:06 Re: [rener@mediom.qc.ca: error in release schedule calendar] [gnu.org #15501] Janis Johnson
22:57 Re: register allocation versus scheduling Geoff Keating
22:54 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Geoff Keating
22:48 patch that caused regression PR c/7949 Janis Johnson
22:47 regression that caused PR c++/9165 Janis Johnson
22:47 patch that caused regression PR c++/9167 Janis Johnson
22:45 problem with -ax option Satyavathi Malladi
22:04 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Michael S. Zick
21:53 Problem with new port Alleged Judas
21:48 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Michael S. Zick
21:45 Re: New regressions Mark Mitchell
21:44 Re: New regressions Jason Merrill
21:37 Re: New regressions Paolo Carlini
21:29 Re: New regressions Jason Merrill
21:28 Re: remove C++ warning about all private c/dtors and no friends? Jason Merrill
21:20 New regressions Mark Mitchell
20:59 Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc cvs trunk (3.3) on sparc64-{solaris*,linux} Christian Jönsson
20:24 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Robert Dewar
20:18 Re: remove C++ warning about all private c/dtors and no friends? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:50 Re: remove C++ warning about all private c/dtors and no friends? Mark Mitchell
19:47 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Tom Lord
19:42 Re: Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question. Tom Lord
19:42 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Tom Lord
19:42 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Tom Lord
19:42 Re: Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question. Tom Lord
19:39 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Tom Lord
19:09 remove C++ warning about all private c/dtors and no friends? Jason Merrill
18:45 current version of ELF format Jeremy R Mcjunkin
18:28 Re: libffi build broken on gcc-3.3 branch Jeff Sturm
18:27 Re: speeding up parts of gcc by using ffs Joseph S. Myers
18:08 libffi build broken on gcc-3.3 branch Matthias Klose
17:50 Re: speeding up parts of gcc by using ffs Zack Weinberg
16:46 Re: RFD: constraint letter suffixes Joern Rennecke
15:19 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Michael S. Zick
14:27 Re: generating core dumps Phil Edwards
14:21 Bom dia gcc Ricardo.
13:21 Re: RFD: constraint letter suffixes Joern Rennecke
13:07 generating core dumps Inderjeet Saggu
12:18 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
10:51 Re: c++ "with" keyword Andrew Haley
09:00 Re: speeding up parts of gcc by using ffs Andrew Pinski
08:06 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Andy Walker
07:45 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Andy Walker
06:50 New targets to Binutils for H8 series Shrinivas Atre
06:49 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Daniel Berlin
06:39 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Andy Walker
06:29 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Andy Walker
05:36 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Andy Walker
05:18 Re: Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question. Andy Walker
05:04 Re: Analysis of solaris2 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc failures Benjamin Kosnik
05:01 Re: Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question. Andy Walker
04:53 Re: Synthetic register related: consequences of changing Frame layout. Andy Walker
04:40 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Andy Walker
04:38 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Andy Walker
04:08 Re: Analysis of solaris2 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc failures Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:08 Re: register allocation versus scheduling Daniel Berlin
02:52 Re: register allocation versus scheduling Falk Hueffner
01:36 register allocation versus scheduling Brad Lucier
01:06 Re: darwin & libgcj ? Jeff Sturm
00:27 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Gabriel Dos Reis

January 05, 2003
23:37 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Zack Weinberg
23:18 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Neil Booth
23:11 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Zack Weinberg
23:07 Re: More embarrassing failures to optimize Zack Weinberg
23:07 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Neil Booth
23:05 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Zack Weinberg
23:01 Re: darwin & libgcj ? Andrew Haley
22:53 Re: More embarrassing failures to optimize Martin Buchholz
22:33 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Neil Booth
22:14 Re: Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question. Tom Lord
22:14 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Tom Lord
21:49 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Bonzini
21:33 Re: darwin & libgcj ? Geoff Keating
21:06 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Neil Booth
20:27 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Diego Novillo
20:15 anonymous namespaces and possible linker trouble Gianni Mariani
19:36 Re: Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question. Michael S. Zick
18:51 Re: Analysis of solaris2 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc failures Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:41 Re: More embarrassing failures to optimize Zack Weinberg
18:24 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
18:22 Re: Automatic reply by the debian bug tracking system spams GNATS and vice versa Colin Watson
18:13 Re: c++ "with" keyword Joseph S. Myers
17:59 Re: Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question. Robert Dewar
17:37 Re: g77 -fixed-line-length-none -x f77-cpp-input -c blah.f Alexandre Oliva
16:56 Re: Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question. Michael S. Zick
16:50 Re: Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question. Michael S. Zick
16:30 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Michael S. Zick
15:47 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Michael S. Zick
14:24 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Robert Dewar
14:17 Re: Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question. Robert Dewar
14:08 Re: [GCC] Re: c++ "with" keyword Trevor Jenkins
14:05 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Robert Dewar
13:45 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Robert Dewar
13:39 RE: Patching the docs Scott Robert Ladd
13:25 Re: c++ "with" keyword Toon Moene
13:13 Re: Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question. Robert Dewar
13:03 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Robert Dewar
12:56 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
12:56 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
12:44 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
12:28 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
11:42 Re: Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question. Robert Dewar
11:41 Re: Synthetic register related: consequences of changing Frame layout. Robert Dewar
11:38 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Robert Dewar
11:36 Re: darwin & libgcj ? Andreas Tobler
11:33 Re: c++ "with" keyword Toon Moene
11:19 Re: c++ "with" keyword Andrew Haley
10:44 Re: Analysis of solaris2 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc failures Phil Edwards
08:41 More embarrassing failures to optimize Martin Buchholz
07:46 Re: speeding up parts of gcc by using count_leading_zero (long) Zack Weinberg
07:17 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Zack Weinberg
07:03 Re: speeding up parts of gcc by using count_leading_zero (long) Peter Barada
06:52 Re: speeding up parts of gcc by using count_leading_zero (long) Zack Weinberg
06:31 embedded systems ramesh sangili
06:16 Re: Analysis of solaris2 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc failures Kaveh R. Ghazi
06:08 speeding up parts of gcc by using count_leading_zero (long) Andrew Pinski
05:53 Sythetic registers: modrm/gas question. Andy Walker
05:44 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Andy Walker
05:43 Re: Synthetic register related: consequences of changing Frame layout. Andy Walker
05:43 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Andy Walker
04:57 -ax option Satyavathi Malladi
03:41 Re: Analysis of solaris2 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc failures Benjamin Kosnik
03:16 Re: Removal of c++filt causes g++ testsuite failures Zack Weinberg
02:55 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
02:21 Re: c++ "with" keyword Gianni Mariani
02:18 None Matt Juszczak
01:55 Re: Analysis of solaris2 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc failures Gabriel Dos Reis
00:38 Re: Analysis of solaris2 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc failures Benjamin Kosnik
00:37 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
00:29 Re: c++ "with" keyword Kevin Handy

January 04, 2003
23:36 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
23:32 Re: c++ "with" keyword Lynn Winebarger
23:27 Re: c++ "with" keyword Kevin Handy
22:36 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
22:13 Re: c++ "with" keyword Gianni Mariani
20:59 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
20:58 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
20:55 Re: c++ "with" keyword Gianni Mariani
20:19 Re: Patching the docs Joseph S. Myers
20:12 Re: Change in preprocessor behavior Zack Weinberg
20:09 Re: Patching the docs Craig Rodrigues
20:05 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
19:59 Patching the docs Scott Robert Ladd
19:59 Updated Numbers -- GCJ Wins! Scott Robert Ladd
19:58 Re: c++ "with" keyword Tolga Dalman
19:36 Re: g77 -fixed-line-length-none -x f77-cpp-input -c blah.f Neil Booth
19:13 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
19:10 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
18:54 Re: g77 -fixed-line-length-none -x f77-cpp-input -c blah.f Toon Moene
18:54 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Robert Dewar
18:47 Re: c++ "with" keyword Tolga Dalman
18:36 Re: c++ "with" keyword Gianni Mariani
18:12 Re: c++ "with" keyword Gianni Mariani
18:11 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Robert Dewar
18:10 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
18:00 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] shared libobjc not built Alexandre Oliva
17:59 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Denis Chertykov
17:59 Re: c++ "with" keyword Gianni Mariani
17:55 Re: c++ "with" keyword Tolga Dalman
17:52 Re: Synthetic register related: consequences of changing Frame layout. Denis Chertykov
17:52 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Robert Dewar
17:35 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
17:32 Re: c++ "with" keyword Gianni Mariani
17:22 Re: g77 -fixed-line-length-none -x f77-cpp-input -c blah.f Erik Schnetter
17:06 Re: c++ "with" keyword Daniel Berlin
16:25 Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
16:21 Re: c++ "with" keyword Neil Booth
16:01 Re: g77 -fixed-line-length-none -x f77-cpp-input -c blah.f Paul Brook
15:54 Re: ISO C and C++ Standards Docs Robert Dewar
15:24 Compilation Problems with libjava Andrew Haley
15:21 Re: c++ "with" keyword Andrew Haley
15:14 Compilation Problems with libjava lowfill
15:00 Re: c++ "with" keyword Momchil Velikov
14:56 Re: Analysis of solaris2 27_io/istream_extractor_arith.cc failures Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:50 Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers Robert Dewar
14:29 Re: Re: c++ "with" keyword Robert Dewar
14:26 Re: Synthetic register related: maximum value of a modrm byte in i386 Andy Walker
14:23 Re: [MinGW-patches] Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] shared libobjc not built Earnie Boyd
14:21 need help on gcc installation Andrew Haley
14:07 g77 -fixed-line-length-none -x f77-cpp-input -c blah.f Toon Moene
14:07 need help on gcc installation duraisamy dheepan
13:29 Some questions Laurent
12:51 sh-elf-gcc simd problem with GCC 3.3 prerelease Nitin Gupta, Noida
11:37 Re: Synthetic register related: maximum value of a modrm byte in i386 Robert Dewar
11:11 Re: darwin & libgcj ? Andreas Tobler
11:02 Re: darwin & libgcj ? Andrew Haley
10:47 Re: darwin & libgcj ? Andreas Tobler
10:39 darwin & libgcj ? Andrew Haley
08:14 darwin & libgcj ? Andreas Tobler
07:04 Synthetic register related: consequences of changing Frame layout. Andy Walker
07:02 [rener@mediom.qc.ca: error in release schedule calendar] [gnu.org #15501] Brett Smith
06:53 Synthetic register related: maximum value of a modrm byte in i386 Andy Walker
05:58 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] shared libobjc not built Timothy J. Wood
03:28 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] shared libobjc not built Timothy J. Wood
00:59 No 'g' stab type generated for pointer-to-function in C/C++ - suggestion for devel. Dave Hooper
00:35 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Phil Edwards

January 03, 2003
20:55 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Mike Stump
19:37 Re: Generated unique labels Joseph S. Myers
18:24 Re: Build error Jeff Sturm
18:16 Re: Generated unique labels Jonah
18:13 Re: Bootstrap failure of gcc cvs trunk (3.3) on sparc64-{solaris*,linux} c.christian.joensson
17:37 Build error Pedro Manuel Augusto
17:34 Re: Generated unique labels Richard Henderson
17:06 Re: C++ trees -- help wanted with c++/3784 Nathan Sidwell
16:58 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Andreas Jaeger
16:34 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Diego Novillo
16:29 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Diego Novillo
16:22 Re: tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Jason Merrill
16:06 tree-ssa-cvs corrupt Andreas Jaeger
14:05 Re: GCC still getting a lot slower Jan Hubicka
12:28 Re: Generated unique labels Jonah
11:40 C++ trees -- help wanted with c++/3784 Nathanael Nerode
10:33 Re: GCC still getting a lot slower Ben Elliston
09:55 bootstrap of tree-ssa fails with ada Andreas Jaeger
05:36 Re: Problem with config.guess in top-of-tree Ben Elliston
05:27 install-driver commands Christian Cornelssen
05:21 LSB inclusion of C++ Benjamin Kosnik
03:55 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] shared libobjc not built Nicola Pero
03:37 configure problem - vfork Kim Ju-Yeol
01:35 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Richard Henderson
01:02 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline John David Anglin
00:46 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] shared libobjc not built Timothy J. Wood
00:44 Re: Generated unique labels James Buchanan
00:43 RE: Generated unique labels James Buchanan
00:25 Re: Generated unique labels Richard Henderson
00:21 Re: GCC still getting a lot slower Fergus Henderson
00:14 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Fergus Henderson
00:01 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] shared libobjc not built Nicola Pero

January 02, 2003
22:55 Re: GNATS problems Neil Booth
22:41 Re: when did support for i686 begin Joe Buck
22:21 Re: [pch-branch] missing binary operator issue. Andrew Pinski
22:16 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Richard Henderson
22:14 GNATS problems Janis Johnson
22:11 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Richard Henderson
21:26 Re: [pch-branch] missing binary operator issue. Karel Gardas
21:10 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Andreas Jaeger
21:04 Re: Change in preprocessor behavior Devang Patel
21:02 Re: Change in preprocessor behavior Devang Patel
20:54 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] shared libobjc not built Timothy J. Wood
20:42 Re: Change in preprocessor behavior Mike Stump
20:25 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Martin v. Löwis
20:13 installing gcc3.2.1 in mac os x 10.2.2 Ben Dougall
19:55 Build broken in cp/parser.c Paolo Carlini
19:50 when did support for i686 begin Hunter Peress
19:42 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Ulrich Drepper
19:26 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Paul Jarc
19:16 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline John David Anglin
19:10 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Dale Johannesen
18:58 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Paul Jarc
18:58 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline John David Anglin
18:52 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline John David Anglin
18:00 Re: How to report pch-branch bugs? Geoff Keating
17:59 Re: [pch-branch] missing binary operator issue. Geoff Keating
17:57 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Daniel Jacobowitz
17:54 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Jakub Jelinek
17:48 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline John David Anglin
17:48 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline "Martin v. Löwis"
17:43 RE: Linux Number Crunching: Benchmarking Compilers and Languages on ia32 Scott Robert Ladd
17:38 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline John David Anglin
17:32 Preprocessing a Java Source using gcj Andrew Haley
17:29 Preprocessing a Java Source using gcj Jan Kaiser
17:15 Re: Planning for the Autoconf 2.5x transition? Benjamin Kosnik
17:02 Re: Linux Number Crunching: Benchmarking Compilers and Languages on ia32 Benjamin Kosnik
16:32 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] shared libobjc not built Nicola Pero
16:06 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] shared libobjc not built Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci
15:48 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] shared libobjc not built Nicola Pero
15:31 Re: [3.2/3.3/HEAD] shared libobjc not built Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci
15:21 Linux Number Crunching: Benchmarking Compilers and Languages on ia32 Scott Robert Ladd
14:43 -fvtable-thunks and -Wno-deprecated Manu
14:41 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Andreas Jaeger
14:24 Re: GCC still getting a lot slower Jan Hubicka
14:21 Re: GCC still getting a lot slower Jan Hubicka
13:53 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Andreas Jaeger
13:27 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Jakub Jelinek
13:18 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Andreas Jaeger
10:59 Re: GCC still getting a lot slower Gerald Pfeifer
08:45 Re: New GNATS category request Gerald Pfeifer
08:44 new parser problems - or just my code... Gareth Pearce
07:42 RE: Generated unique labels Joseph D. Wagner
07:25 Re: c++/2437: [two-stage name lookup] template name binding problem(request for testcase-writing help) Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
06:54 Re: ISO C and C++ Standards Docs Paul Jarc
05:27 Re: New GNATS category request Neil Booth
05:24 Re: New GNATS category request Neil Booth
00:23 final installing gcc into os x instructions Ben Dougall
00:09 Re: New GNATS category request Gerald Pfeifer

January 01, 2003
23:40 Problem with configure Joseph D. Wagner
23:04 installing gcc into os x instructions Ben Dougall
22:54 Re: New GNATS category request Neil Booth
22:44 DELETE THIS installing gcc into os x instructions Ben Dougall
21:59 Re: c++/2437: [two-stage name lookup] template name binding problem (request for testcase-writing help) Nathanael Nerode
21:38 Re: DELETE THIS installing gcc into os x instructions Ben Dougall
21:09 installing gcc into os x instructions Ben Dougall
18:31 Re: ISO C and C++ Standards Docs James Buchanan
18:27 bumping libstdc++ version number on 3.3 branch and HEAD? Matthias Klose
17:57 Re: ISO C and C++ Standards Docs Dockeen
17:43 Re: Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline John David Anglin
15:52 [3.2/3.3/HEAD] shared libobjc not built Matthias Klose
15:28 [HEAD] bootstrap error using --enable-objc-gc Matthias Klose
15:23 Re: Bootstrap failure on irix6.5 possibly caused by new C++ parser? Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:37 Miscompilation of glibc with CVS mainline Andreas Jaeger
12:01 Re: ISO C and C++ Standards Docs Neil Booth
11:58 Re: ISO C and C++ Standards Docs James Buchanan
11:50 Re: ISO C and C++ Standards Docs Neil Booth
11:41 ISO C and C++ Standards Docs James Buchanan
10:39 Re: [RFC] Update to current automake/autoconf/libtool versions. Nathanael Nerode


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.14