This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Invalid code in <limits>

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "rth at redhat dot com" <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 14:18:12 -0800
Subject: Re: Invalid code in <limits>

--On Wednesday, January 29, 2003 02:15:19 PM -0800 Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> wrote:

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

If we do that, things will work -- but then we might as well have
builtin *values* -- rather than builtin *functions*.

That's what I'm suggesting.

That's fine from a semantic point of view, but please don't change the
syntax. __builtin_{nan,huge_val,...} are used in C headers which aren't
shipped with the compiler.

I certainly won't remove any existing builtin functions, no matter what
else we end up doing.

--
Mark Mitchell                mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- Re: Invalid code in <limits>
  - From: Geoff Keating

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]