This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: equality of label addresses


> 
> Consistency with the C language's treatment of function addresses
> would suggest that this optimization should not be permitted,
> so if the intent is that it *is* permitted, then I think the GCC
> documentation should make this explicit.

it seems clear to me that this optimization should be permitted. The
address of a label is necessarily a highly implementation dependent
value.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]